Mirdamadi J L, Suzuki L Y, Meehan S K
School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Neuroscience. 2016 Oct 1;333:132-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.07.015. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
Knowledge of the properties that govern the effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) interventions is critical to clinical application. Extrapolation to clinical populations has been limited by high inter-subject variability and a focus on intrinsic muscles of the hand in healthy populations. Therefore, the current study assessed variability of continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), a patterned TMS protocol, across an agonist-antagonist pair of extrinsic muscles of the hand. Secondarily, we assessed whether concurrent agonist contraction could enhance the efficacy of cTBS. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) were simultaneously recorded from the agonist flexor (FCR) and antagonist extensor (ECR) carpi radialis before and after cTBS over the FCR hotspot. cTBS was delivered with the FCR relaxed (cTBS-Relax) or during isometric wrist flexion (cTBS-Contract). cTBS-Relax suppressed FCR MEPs evoked from the FCR hotspot. However, the extent of FCR MEP suppression was strongly correlated with the relative difference between FCR and ECR resting motor thresholds. cTBS-Contract decreased FCR suppression but increased suppression of ECR MEPs elicited from the FCR hotspot. The magnitude of ECR MEP suppression following cTBS-Contract was independent of the threshold-amplitude relationships observed with cTBS-Relax. Contraction alone had no effect confirming the effect of cTBS-Contract was driven by the interaction between neuromuscular activity and cTBS. Interactions across muscle representations should be taken into account when predicting cTBS outcomes in healthy and clinical populations. Contraction during cTBS may be a useful means of focusing aftereffects when differences in baseline excitability across overlapping agonist-antagonist cortical representations may mitigate the inhibitory effect of cTBS.
了解决定经颅磁刺激(TMS)干预效果的特性对于临床应用至关重要。由于个体间差异较大,且健康人群研究主要集中在手的固有肌,因此将相关研究结果外推至临床人群受到了限制。因此,本研究评估了连续theta爆发刺激(cTBS,一种模式化TMS方案)对手部一对主动肌-拮抗肌(外在肌)的变异性。其次,我们评估了同时进行的主动肌收缩是否能增强cTBS的疗效。在FCR热点进行cTBS前后,同步记录桡侧腕屈肌(FCR,主动肌)和桡侧腕伸肌(ECR,拮抗肌)的运动诱发电位(MEP)。cTBS分别在FCR放松状态下(cTBS-Relax)或等长腕部屈曲过程中(cTBS-Contract)进行。cTBS-Relax抑制了由FCR热点诱发的FCR MEP。然而,FCR MEP的抑制程度与FCR和ECR静息运动阈值的相对差异密切相关。cTBS-Contract降低了FCR的抑制,但增加了由FCR热点诱发的ECR MEP的抑制。cTBS-Contract后ECR MEP的抑制幅度与cTBS-Relax观察到的阈值-幅度关系无关。单独收缩无效果,证实cTBS-Contract的效果是由神经肌肉活动与cTBS之间的相互作用驱动的。在预测健康人群和临床人群的cTBS结果时,应考虑跨肌肉代表区的相互作用。当重叠的主动肌-拮抗肌皮质代表区的基线兴奋性差异可能减轻cTBS的抑制作用时,cTBS期间的收缩可能是一种聚焦后效应的有用方法。