Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation and Division of Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation and Division of Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Neuroscience and Motor Control Group (NEUROcom), Institute for Biomedical Research (INIBIC), Universidade de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Neuroscience. 2019 Oct 15;418:157-165. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.08.043. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
To assess motor cortex neurophysiology, including the mechanisms of neuroplasticity, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is typically applied to the motor "hotspot"- the optimal site for inducing a twitch in a given target muscle. It is known that the effects of suprathreshold repetitive TMS (rTMS) spread along functional connections beyond the specific cortical stimulation target, and yet, it is unknown whether the aftereffects of subthreshold intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS), an ultra-high frequency patterned rTMS protocol, extend beyond the targeted muscle. We investigated whether and to what extent iTBS induces changes in the cortical output to other intrinsic hand muscles with adjacent cortical representation to the target. Sixteen healthy adults underwent neuronavigated TMS-iTBS targeting the first dorsal interosseus (FDI) hotspot. Proportion of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) at the resting motor threshold (RMT), baseline MEP amplitude, and iTBS-induced changes in MEP amplitude were compared between FDI, abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles. MEP amplitudes recorded from the three muscles at RMT and suprathreshold intensities indicated the chosen hotspots were relatively selective for FDI. Nevertheless, iTBS induced significant facilitation of MEPs recorded from both FDI and APB, but not ADM. Surprisingly, the MEP modulation was greater in APB, even when controlling for the baseline MEP amplitude. These results indicate that iTBS modulation of cortico-spinal excitability extends beyond the representation of the targeted muscle. Results have implications both for how iTBS may be used in clinical treatment and for the safety guidelines for the application of iTBS.
为了评估运动皮层的神经生理学,包括神经可塑性的机制,通常应用经颅磁刺激(TMS)于运动“热点”——即诱发特定靶肌肉抽搐的最佳部位。已知阈上重复 TMS(rTMS)的效应沿功能连接扩散,超出特定皮质刺激靶区,然而,阈下间歇性 theta 爆发刺激(iTBS)——一种超高频率模式 rTMS 方案的后效是否超出靶向肌肉尚不清楚。我们研究了 iTBS 是否以及在何种程度上诱导与目标肌肉具有相邻皮质代表区的其他内在手部肌肉的皮质输出发生变化。16 名健康成年人接受了经神经导航的 TMS-iTBS 靶向第一背侧骨间肌(FDI)热点。在静息运动阈值(RMT)、基线运动诱发电位(MEP)幅度和 iTBS 诱导的 MEP 幅度变化之间比较了 FDI、拇短展肌(APB)和小指展肌(ADM)肌肉的比例。在 RMT 和阈上强度记录的来自三个肌肉的 MEP 幅度表明,所选热点对 FDI 相对具有选择性。然而,iTBS 诱导了 FDI 和 APB 记录的 MEP 显著易化,但 ADM 没有。令人惊讶的是,即使控制基线 MEP 幅度,APB 的 MEP 调制也更大。这些结果表明,iTBS 对皮质脊髓兴奋性的调制超出了靶向肌肉的代表区。结果既对 iTBS 在临床治疗中的应用有影响,也对 iTBS 应用的安全指南有影响。