Ezenwa V O
Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Department of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Parasite Immunol. 2016 Sep;38(9):527-34. doi: 10.1111/pim.12348.
Co-infection is now recognized as the natural state of affairs in most hosts and co-infecting parasites interact in a variety of ways that can impact host health and parasite fitness. Interactions between helminths and microparasites have captured particular attention in this regard owing to the ubiquity of helminth infections in many host populations. The mechanistic underpinnings and health implications of co-infection are typically studied in laboratory and clinical settings, but recently studies of wild species have begun to tackle similar issues. Case studies from three wild mammal groups-ruminants, rodents and rabbits-serve to highlight how wild studies are contributing to the broader co-infection literature. This work suggests that wildlife research can generate new and unique insights about helminth-microparasite co-infection that are fostered in part by studying parasite interactions in a natural context. For this reason, increased integration of wild studies with research in human, laboratory and veterinary animal populations can help pave the way towards a more complete understanding of the issue of co-infection.
目前,共感染被认为是大多数宿主的自然状态,共感染的寄生虫会以多种方式相互作用,从而影响宿主健康和寄生虫适应性。由于许多宿主群体中普遍存在蠕虫感染,蠕虫与微寄生虫之间的相互作用在这方面受到了特别关注。共感染的机制基础和对健康的影响通常在实验室和临床环境中进行研究,但最近对野生动物的研究也开始探讨类似问题。来自反刍动物、啮齿动物和兔子这三类野生哺乳动物群体的案例研究,凸显了野外研究对更广泛的共感染文献的贡献。这项工作表明,野生动物研究可以产生关于蠕虫-微寄生虫共感染的全新且独特的见解,这在一定程度上得益于在自然环境中研究寄生虫的相互作用。因此,加强野外研究与人类、实验室及兽医动物群体研究的整合,有助于为更全面地理解共感染问题铺平道路。