Fabritius M L, Geisler A, Petersen P L, Nikolajsen L, Hansen M S, Kontinen V, Hamunen K, Dahl J B, Wetterslev J, Mathiesen O
Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016 Oct;60(9):1188-208. doi: 10.1111/aas.12766. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
Perioperative pain treatment often consist of combinations of non-opioid and opioid analgesics, 'multimodal analgesia', in which gabapentin is currently used. The aim was to document beneficial and harmful effects of perioperative gabapentin treatment.
Randomized clinical trials comparing gabapentin vs. placebo or active placebo in adult surgical patients receiving gabapentin perioperatively were included. This review was conducted using Cochrane standards, trial sequential analysis (TSA), and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). The primary outcomes were 24-h opioid consumption and incidence of serious adverse events (SAE).
One hundred and thirty-two trials with 9498 patients were included. Thirteen trials with low risk of bias reported a reduction in 24-h opioid consumption of 3.1 mg [0.5, 5.6] [corrected]. In the analysis of gabapentin as add-on analgesic to another non-opioid analgesic regimen found a mean reduction in 24-h morphine consumption of 1.2 mg [-0.3, 2.6; TSA-adjusted CI: -0.3, 2.6] in trials with low risk of bias. [corrected]. Nine trials with low risk of bias reported a risk ratio of SAEs of 1.61 [0.91; 2.86; TSA-adjusted CI: 0.57, 4.57].
Based on GRADE assessment of the primary outcomes in trials with low risk of bias, the results are low or very low quality of evidence due to imprecision, inconsistency, and in some outcomes indirectness. Firm evidence for use of gabapentin is lacking as clinically relevant beneficial effect of gabapentin may be absent and harm is imminent, especially when added to multimodal analgesia.
围手术期疼痛治疗通常由非阿片类和阿片类镇痛药联合组成,即“多模式镇痛”,目前加巴喷丁也用于其中。目的是记录围手术期加巴喷丁治疗的有益和有害作用。
纳入在围手术期接受加巴喷丁治疗的成年外科患者中比较加巴喷丁与安慰剂或活性安慰剂的随机临床试验。本综述采用Cochrane标准、试验序贯分析(TSA)和推荐分级评估、制定与评价(GRADE)进行。主要结局为24小时阿片类药物消耗量和严重不良事件(SAE)发生率。
纳入了132项试验,共9498例患者。13项偏倚风险低的试验报告24小时阿片类药物消耗量减少3.1毫克[0.5,5.6][校正后]。在分析加巴喷丁作为另一种非阿片类镇痛方案的附加镇痛药时,偏倚风险低的试验中24小时吗啡消耗量平均减少1.2毫克[-0.3,2.6;TSA校正CI:-0.3,2.6][校正后]。9项偏倚风险低的试验报告SAE的风险比为1.61[0.91;2.86;TSA校正CI:0.57,4.57]。
基于对偏倚风险低的试验中主要结局的GRADE评估,由于不精确性、不一致性以及某些结局的间接性,结果的证据质量低或非常低。缺乏使用加巴喷丁的确凿证据,因为加巴喷丁可能不存在临床相关有益作用且危害迫在眉睫,尤其是添加到多模式镇痛中时。