• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

母语对巴西和加拿大语言病理学家完成的语音样本听觉感知评估的影响。

The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.

作者信息

Chaves Cristiane Ribeiro, Campbell Melanie, Côrtes Gama Ana Cristina

机构信息

Speech-Language Pathology, Post-Graduate Program in Speech Therapy Sciences, Department of Speech-Language Pathology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Speech-Language Pathology, Rehabilitation Medicine, Communication Sciences and Disorders Department, University of Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):258.e1-258.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.05.021. Epub 2016 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.05.021
PMID:27427162
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the influence of native language on the auditory-perceptual assessment of voice, as completed by Brazilian and Anglo-Canadian listeners using Brazilian vocal samples and the grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, strain (GRBAS) scale.

STUDY DESIGN

This is an analytical, observational, comparative, and transversal study conducted at the Speech Language Pathology Department of the Federal University of Minas Gerais in Brazil, and at the Communication Sciences and Disorders Department of the University of Alberta in Canada.

METHODS

The GRBAS scale, connected speech, and a sustained vowel were used in this study. The vocal samples were drawn randomly from a database of recorded speech of Brazilian adults, some with healthy voices and some with voice disorders. The database is housed at the Federal University of Minas Gerais. Forty-six samples of connected speech (recitation of days of the week), produced by 35 women and 11 men, and 46 samples of the sustained vowel /a/, produced by 37 women and 9 men, were used in this study. The listeners were divided into two groups of three speech therapists, according to nationality: Brazilian or Anglo-Canadian. The groups were matched according to the years of professional experience of participants. The weighted kappa was used to calculate the intra- and inter-rater agreements, with 95% confidence intervals, respectively.

RESULTS

An analysis of the intra-rater agreement showed that Brazilians and Canadians had similar results in auditory-perceptual evaluation of sustained vowel and connected speech. The results of the inter-rater agreement of connected speech and sustained vowel indicated that Brazilians and Canadians had, respectively, moderate agreement on the overall severity (0.57 and 0.50), breathiness (0.45 and 0.45), and asthenia (0.50 and 0.46); poor correlation on roughness (0.19 and 0.007); and weak correlation on strain to connected speech (0.22), and moderate correlation to sustained vowel (0.50).

CONCLUSION

In general, auditory-perceptual evaluation is not influenced by the native language on most dimensions of the perceptual parameters of the GRBAS scale.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定母语对语音听觉感知评估的影响,该评估由巴西和英裔加拿大听众使用巴西语音样本并采用等级、粗糙度、气息声、无力感、紧张度(GRBAS)量表完成。

研究设计

这是一项在巴西米纳斯吉拉斯联邦大学言语语言病理学系和加拿大阿尔伯塔大学通信科学与障碍学系进行的分析性、观察性、对比性横断面研究。

方法

本研究使用了GRBAS量表、连贯言语和一个持续元音。语音样本从巴西成年人录音语音数据库中随机抽取,其中一些人声音健康,一些人存在语音障碍。该数据库存于米纳斯吉拉斯联邦大学。本研究使用了由35名女性和11名男性产生的46个连贯言语样本(背诵一周中的日子),以及由37名女性和9名男性产生的46个持续元音/a/样本。听众根据国籍分为两组,每组由三名言语治疗师组成:巴西组或英裔加拿大组。两组根据参与者的专业经验年限进行匹配。加权kappa用于分别计算评分者内和评分者间的一致性,并给出95%置信区间。

结果

评分者内一致性分析表明,巴西人和加拿大人在持续元音和连贯言语的听觉感知评估中结果相似。连贯言语和持续元音的评分者间一致性结果表明,巴西人和加拿大人在总体严重程度(分别为0.57和0.50)、气息声(分别为0.45和0.45)和无力感(分别为0.50和0.46)方面有中等程度的一致性;在粗糙度方面相关性较差(分别为0.19和0.007);在连贯言语的紧张度方面相关性较弱(0.22),在持续元音的紧张度方面相关性中等(0.50)。

结论

总体而言,在GRBAS量表感知参数的大多数维度上,听觉感知评估不受母语影响。

相似文献

1
The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.母语对巴西和加拿大语言病理学家完成的语音样本听觉感知评估的影响。
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):258.e1-258.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.05.021. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
2
Teachers' Perception of Vocal Quality Compared With Professional Perception.教师对嗓音质量的认知与专业人士的认知比较。
J Voice. 2016 Nov;30(6):763.e17-763.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
3
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.立陶宛语声学语音质量指数的验证。
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):257.e1-257.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
4
Effect of Auditory-Perceptual Training With Natural Voice Anchors on Vocal Quality Evaluation.基于自然语音基准的听觉感知训练对嗓音质量评估的影响
J Voice. 2019 Mar;33(2):220-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.10.020. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
5
The effect of visual feedback and training in auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality.视觉反馈与训练对嗓音质量听觉感知判断的影响。
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2017 Apr;42(1):1-8. doi: 10.3109/14015439.2015.1091036. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
6
Comparison of Rater's reliability on perceptual evaluation of different types of voice sample.不同类型嗓音样本的听感知评估中评估者可靠性的比较。
J Voice. 2012 Sep;26(5):666.e13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.08.003. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
7
Auditory Perception of Roughness and Breathiness by Dysphonic Women.嗓音粗糙和气息声感知的研究:嗓音障碍女性的感知。
J Voice. 2024 Sep;38(5):1249.e1-1249.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
8
Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech.测量韩语语音发声障碍严重程度的听觉感知和声学方法
J Voice. 2016 Sep;30(5):587-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
9
Concatenation of the Moving Window Technique for Auditory-Perceptual Analysis of Voice Quality.拼接移动窗口技术在嗓音音质听觉感知分析中的应用。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Nov 21;27(4):1426-1433. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0103.
10
GRBAS and Cape-V scales: high reliability and consensus when applied at different times.GRBAS 和 Cape-V 量表:在不同时间应用时具有高度可靠性和一致性。
J Voice. 2012 Nov;26(6):812.e17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Zoom in: factors affecting vocal habits during online meetings, a prospective trial on 40 subjects.深入研究:在线会议期间影响发声习惯的因素,一项针对40名受试者的前瞻性试验。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jun;281(6):3039-3049. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08580-6. Epub 2024 Mar 29.