Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Systematic Overviews through advancing Research Technology (SORT), Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Obes Rev. 2016 Oct;17(10):945-59. doi: 10.1111/obr.12445. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
Marketing of foods and beverages high in fat, sugar and salt are suggested to contribute to poor dietary behaviours in children and diet-related diseases later in life. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials aimed to assess the effects of unhealthy food and beverage marketing on dietary intake (grams or kilocalories) and dietary preference (preference score or percentage of participants who selected specific foods/beverages) among children 2 to 18 years of age. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO up to January 2015 for terms related to advertising, unhealthy foods or beverages among children. Randomized trials that assessed the effects of unhealthy food and beverage marketing compared with non-dietary advertisement or no advertisement in children were considered eligible. Two authors independently extracted information on study characteristics and outcomes of interest and assessed risk of bias and the overall quality of evidence using grade methodology. Meta-analysis was conducted separately for dietary intake and preference using a random-effects model. We identified 29 eligible studies, of which 17 studies were included for meta-analysis of dietary preference and nine for meta-analysis of dietary intake. Almost half of the studies were at high risk of bias. Our meta-analysis showed that in children exposed to unhealthy dietary marketing, dietary intake significantly increased (mean difference [MD] = 30.4 kcal, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9 to 57.9, and MD = 4.8 g, 95%CI 0.8 to 8.8) during or shortly after exposure to advertisements. Similarly, children exposed to the unhealthy dietary marketing had a higher risk of selecting the advertised foods or beverages (relative risk = 1.1, 95%CI 1.0 to 1.2; P = 0.052). The evidence indicates that unhealthy food and beverage marketing increases dietary intake (moderate quality evidence) and preference (moderate to low quality evidence) for energy-dense, low-nutrition food and beverage. Unhealthy food and beverage marketing increased dietary intake and influenced dietary preference in children during or shortly after exposure to advertisements. © 2016 World Obesity.
食品和饮料的营销高的脂肪、糖和盐被认为是造成儿童不良饮食行为和与饮食有关的疾病在以后的生活。本系统评价和荟萃分析随机试验旨在评估不健康的食品和饮料营销对饮食摄入(克或千卡)和饮食偏好(偏好得分或参与者选择特定的食物/饮料的百分比)之间的 2 至 18 岁的儿童。我们搜索 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 PsycINFO 截至 2015 年 1 月,用于广告、儿童的不健康食品或饮料相关的条款。随机试验评估了不健康的食品和饮料营销的影响相比,非饮食广告或没有广告在儿童中被认为是合格的。两名作者独立提取有关研究特征和结果的信息,并评估风险的偏见和整体质量的证据使用等级的方法。荟萃分析分别进行了饮食偏好和饮食摄入使用随机效应模型。我们确定了 29 项符合条件的研究,其中 17 项研究纳入饮食偏好的荟萃分析和 9 项纳入饮食摄入的荟萃分析。几乎一半的研究存在高偏倚风险。我们的荟萃分析表明,在儿童接触到不健康的饮食营销,饮食摄入量显著增加(平均差[MD] = 30.4 千卡,95%置信区间[CI] 2.9 到 57.9,和 MD = 4.8 克,95%CI 0.8 到 8.8)在或不久之后暴露于广告。同样,儿童接触到不健康的饮食营销有更高的风险选择广告的食物或饮料(相对风险= 1.1,95%CI 1.0 到 1.2; P = 0.052)。证据表明,不健康的食品和饮料营销增加饮食摄入(中等质量证据)和偏好(中等质量到低质量证据)为高热量、低营养的食物和饮料。不健康的食品和饮料营销增加了饮食摄入和影响儿童的饮食偏好在或不久之后暴露于广告。© 2016 年世界肥胖。