Hildingsson Ingegerd, Gamble Jenny, Sidebotham Mary, Creedy Debra K, Guilliland Karen, Dixon Lesley, Pallant Julie, Fenwick Jennifer
Mid Sweden University, Department of Nursing, Sundsvall, Sweden; Uppsala University, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala, Sweden.
Menzies Health Institute Queensland, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Griffith University, Australia.
Midwifery. 2016 Sep;40:62-9. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
the predicted midwifery workforce shortages in several countries have serious implications for the care of women during pregnancy, birth and post partum. There are a number of factors known to contribute to midwifery shortages and work attrition. However, midwives assessment of their own professional identity and role (sense of empowerment) are perhaps among the most important. There are few international workforce comparisons.
to compare midwives' sense of empowerment across Australia, New Zealand and Sweden using the Perceptions of Empowerment in Midwifery Scale-R (PEMS-Revised).
a self-administered survey package was distributed to midwives through professional colleges and networks in each country. The surveys asked about personal, professional and employment details and included the Perceptions of Empowerment in Midwifery Scale-R (PEMS-Revised). Descriptive statistics for the sample and PEMS were generated separately for the three countries. A series of analysis of variance with posthoc tests (Tukey's HSD) were conducted to compare scale scores across countries. Effect size statistics (partial eta squared) were also calculated.
completed surveys were received from 2585 midwives (Australia 1037; New Zealand 1073 and Sweden 475). Respondents were predominantly female (98%), aged 50-59 years and had significant work experience as a midwife (+20 years). Statistically significant differences were recorded comparing scores on all four PEMS subscales across countries. Moderate effects were found on Professional Recognition, Skills and Resources and Autonomy/Empowerment comparisons. All pairwise comparisons between countries reached statistical significance (p<.001) except between Australia and New Zealand on the Manager Support subscale. Sweden recorded the highest score on three subscales except Skills and Resources which was the lowest score of the three countries. New Zealand midwives scored significantly better than both their Swedish and Australian counterparts in terms of these essential criteria.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: midwives in New Zealand and Sweden had a strong professional identity or sense of empowerment compared to their Australian counterparts. This is likely the result of working in more autonomous ways within a health system that is primary health care focused and a culture that constructs childbirth as a normal but significant life event. If midwifery is to reach its full potential globally then developing midwives sense of autonomy and subsequently their empowerment must be seen as a critical element to recruitment and retention that requires attention and strengthening.
几个国家预计的助产士劳动力短缺对孕期、分娩期和产后妇女的护理有着严重影响。已知有许多因素导致助产士短缺和人员流失。然而,助产士对自身职业身份和角色的评估(赋权感)可能是最重要的因素之一。国际劳动力比较很少。
使用修订后的助产士赋权感知量表(PEMS-R)比较澳大利亚、新西兰和瑞典助产士的赋权感。
通过每个国家的专业学院和网络向助产士分发自填式调查问卷包。调查询问了个人、专业和就业细节,并包括修订后的助产士赋权感知量表(PEMS-R)。分别为这三个国家生成样本和PEMS的描述性统计数据。进行了一系列方差分析及事后检验(Tukey's HSD)以比较各国的量表得分。还计算了效应量统计数据(偏 eta 平方)。
共收到2585名助产士的完整调查问卷(澳大利亚1037名;新西兰1073名;瑞典475名)。受访者主要为女性(98%),年龄在50 - 59岁之间,有作为助产士的丰富工作经验(超过20年)。各国在所有四个PEMS子量表上的得分比较有统计学显著差异。在专业认可、技能与资源以及自主/赋权比较方面发现了中等效应。除了在管理支持子量表上澳大利亚和新西兰之间外,各国之间的所有两两比较均达到统计学显著水平(p <.001)。瑞典在三个子量表上得分最高,但技能与资源子量表得分是三个国家中最低的。在这些关键标准方面,新西兰助产士的得分明显高于瑞典和澳大利亚同行。
讨论/结论:与澳大利亚同行相比,新西兰和瑞典的助产士有更强的职业身份或赋权感。这可能是由于在以初级卫生保健为重点的卫生系统中以更自主的方式工作,以及一种将分娩视为正常但重要的生活事件的文化。如果助产士职业要在全球充分发挥其潜力,那么培养助产士的自主感并进而增强其赋权感必须被视为招聘和留用的关键要素,需要予以关注和加强。