Vogel Ryan N, Davis Drew B, Kimura Brad H, Rathinavelu Senthil, Graves Gabrielle S, Szabo Aniko, Han Dennis P
*The Eye Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI; and †Institute for Health and Society, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Retina. 2017 Feb;37(2):257-264. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001150.
To describe visual outcome and prognostic indicators in neovascular age-related macular degeneration with advanced visual loss at the initiation of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy.
A retrospective chart review was performed on a consecutive series of 1,410 patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy at the Medical College of Wisconsin. Subjects were included if at the initiation of therapy they had 20/200 or worse visual acuity (VA) with no other visually limiting eye disease and a minimum follow-up of 6 months. The change in VA at 6 months and 12 months was assessed compared with baseline. Visual improvement/worsening was defined as at least ± 0.3 logMAR (equivalent to 15 ETDRS [Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study] letters) change. Other factors for analysis included number of injections received, drug type, and various clinical and imaging findings.
One hundred thirty-one cases met the study criteria, and 97 were followed for 12 months. Baseline VA was 1.38 logMAR (20/480 Snellen equivalent). Mean VA change (logMAR) consisted of an improvement of 0.23 (P < 0.0001) at 6 months and 0.17 (P = 0.003) at 12 months. At 12 months, VA improved in 45% and worsened in 20%. Among subjects with baseline VA worse than 20/400, VA improved in 57% and worsened in 20%. On univariate analysis at either the 6 months or 12 months follow-up, visual improvement was associated with retinal hemorrhage (P = 0.03) and subretinal fluid (P = 0.02), whereas visual worsening was associated with retinal pigment epithelial detachment (P = 0.04) and intraretinal fluid (P = 0.01). With multivariate analysis, visual improvement was predicted by both a larger number of injections received (P = 0.001) and a poorer baseline VA (P = 0.001). Injection medication type did not influence outcome.
Statistically significant visual improvement was observed in association with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in patients with severe neovascular age-related macular degeneration, even in patients whose initial VA was worse than that studied in large anti-vascular endothelial growth factor clinical trials. Numerous clinically discernable or potentially modifiable factors may influence outcome in such patients.
描述抗血管内皮生长因子治疗起始时已有严重视力丧失的新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的视力转归及预后指标。
对威斯康星医学院连续接受抗血管内皮生长因子治疗的1410例新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者进行回顾性病历审查。纳入标准为治疗起始时视力为20/200或更差,无其他影响视力的眼部疾病,且随访至少6个月。将6个月和12个月时的视力变化与基线进行比较。视力改善/恶化定义为至少±0.3 logMAR(相当于15个早期糖尿病性视网膜病变研究[ETDRS]字母)的变化。其他分析因素包括注射次数、药物类型以及各种临床和影像学表现。
131例符合研究标准,97例随访12个月。基线视力为1.38 logMAR(相当于20/480 Snellen视力)。平均视力变化(logMAR)在6个月时改善0.23(P < 0.0001),12个月时改善0.17(P = 0.003)。12个月时,45%的患者视力改善,20%的患者视力恶化。在基线视力差于20/400的患者中,57%的患者视力改善,20%的患者视力恶化。在6个月或12个月随访的单因素分析中,视力改善与视网膜出血(P = 0.03)和视网膜下液(P = 0.02)相关,而视力恶化与视网膜色素上皮脱离(P = 0.04)和视网膜内液(P = 0.01)相关。多因素分析显示,注射次数较多(P = 0.001)和基线视力较差(P = 0.001)可预测视力改善。注射药物类型不影响治疗结果。
在严重新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者中,抗血管内皮生长因子治疗可使视力有统计学意义的改善,即使初始视力比大型抗血管内皮生长因子临床试验中研究的视力更差。许多临床上可识别或可能可改变的因素可能影响此类患者的治疗结果。