• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挖掘、攀爬和直立对实验大鼠的重要性。

The importance of burrowing, climbing and standing upright for laboratory rats.

机构信息

Animal Welfare Program , University of British Columbia , 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia , Canada V6T 1Z4.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Jun 29;3(6):160136. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160136. eCollection 2016 Jun.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.160136
PMID:27429772
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4929907/
Abstract

Standard laboratory cages prevent rats (Rattus norvegicus) from performing many behaviours that they perform in the wild, but little is known about how this may affect their welfare. The aims of this study were (i) to record the propensity to burrow, climb and stand upright in 3-, 8- and 13-month old laboratory rats housed in semi-naturalistic environments and (ii) to compare the frequency of lateral stretching in semi-naturalistic versus standard-housed rats; we predicted standard-housed rats would perform more lateral stretches to compensate for the inability to stretch upright. Rats' propensity to burrow remained constant as they aged (approx. 30 bouts per day totalling 20-30 min), suggesting burrowing is important to rats. Climbing decreased from 76 to 7 bouts per day at 3 versus 13 months, probably because of declining physical ability. Upright standing decreased from 178 to 73 bouts per day, but continued to be frequently expressed even in older rats. Standard-housed rats stretched much more frequently than semi-naturalistic-housed rats (53 versus 6 bouts per day at 13 months), perhaps in compensation for inability to stretch upright and to relieve stiffness caused by low mobility associated with standard housing. These findings suggest that standard laboratory cages interfere with important natural behaviours, which is likely to compromise rat welfare.

摘要

标准实验室笼具阻止了大鼠(Rattus norvegicus)进行许多在野外会进行的行为,但对于这如何影响它们的福利知之甚少。本研究的目的是(i)记录在半自然环境中饲养的 3、8 和 13 月龄实验室大鼠的挖洞、攀爬和直立的倾向,以及(ii)比较半自然和标准笼养大鼠的横向伸展频率;我们预测标准笼养大鼠会进行更多的横向伸展,以弥补无法直立伸展的能力。随着大鼠年龄的增长,它们的挖洞倾向保持不变(每天约 30 次,总计 20-30 分钟),这表明挖洞对大鼠很重要。攀爬从 3 个月时的 76 次减少到 13 个月时的 7 次,可能是由于身体能力下降。直立站立从 178 次减少到 73 次,但即使在老年大鼠中也经常表达。与半自然环境饲养的大鼠相比,标准笼养大鼠的伸展频率要高得多(13 个月时为 53 次对 6 次),这可能是为了弥补无法直立伸展和缓解因标准笼养导致的活动能力低下而引起的僵硬。这些发现表明,标准实验室笼具干扰了大鼠的重要自然行为,这可能会损害大鼠的福利。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9abc/4929907/04ddf221e0ae/rsos160136-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9abc/4929907/22ef9a674882/rsos160136-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9abc/4929907/18d16a17b22e/rsos160136-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9abc/4929907/04ddf221e0ae/rsos160136-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9abc/4929907/22ef9a674882/rsos160136-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9abc/4929907/18d16a17b22e/rsos160136-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9abc/4929907/04ddf221e0ae/rsos160136-g3.jpg

相似文献

1
The importance of burrowing, climbing and standing upright for laboratory rats.挖掘、攀爬和直立对实验大鼠的重要性。
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Jun 29;3(6):160136. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160136. eCollection 2016 Jun.
2
Ultrasonic Vocalization Analysis as a Novel Metric to Assess Cage Enrichment in Rats.超声发声分析作为一种评估大鼠笼养环境丰富度的新指标。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2022 Mar 1;61(2):140-148. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-21-000024. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
3
Differences in Anticipatory Behaviour between Rats (Rattus norvegicus) Housed in Standard versus Semi-Naturalistic Laboratory Environments.饲养在标准实验室环境与半自然主义实验室环境中的大鼠(褐家鼠)预期行为的差异
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 28;11(1):e0147595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147595. eCollection 2016.
4
The effects of cage enrichment on agonistic behaviour and dominance in male laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus).笼内环境丰富对雄性实验大鼠(Rattus norvegicus)攻击行为和支配地位的影响。
Res Vet Sci. 2011 Apr;90(2):346-51. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.06.010. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
5
The effects of enriching laboratory cages using various physical structures on multiple measures of welfare in singly-housed rats.用各种物理结构丰富实验室笼具对单笼饲养大鼠多项福利指标的影响。
Lab Anim. 2011 Jul;45(3):145-53. doi: 10.1258/la.2011.010149. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
6
Correction to 'The importance of burrowing, climbing and standing upright for laboratory rats'.对《挖掘、攀爬和直立对实验大鼠的重要性》的更正
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Jan 4;4(1):160984. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160984. eCollection 2017 Jan.
7
Social-housing and use of double-decker cages in rat telemetry studies.社会住房与大鼠遥测研究中双层笼具的使用。
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2019 Mar-Apr;96:87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
8
Use of running plates by floor housed rats: A pilot study.跑台在笼养大鼠中的应用:一项初步研究。
Lab Anim. 2021 Dec;55(6):521-530. doi: 10.1177/00236772211036572. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
9
Effect of lameness and lesion specific causes of lameness on time budgets of dairy cows at pasture and when housed.跛行及跛行的特定病因对奶牛放牧和舍饲时时间分配的影响。
Vet J. 2013 Sep;197(3):788-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.012. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
10
Evaluation of the effects of cage height and stocking density on the behaviour of laying hens in furnished cages.评估笼具高度和饲养密度对配备栖架蛋鸡行为的影响。
Br Poult Sci. 2007 Feb;48(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/00071660601156479.

引用本文的文献

1
Rat boredom-like behaviour in a monotonous versus a varied foraging task: effects of sensory variation.大鼠在单调与多样化觅食任务中的类似无聊行为:感觉变化的影响。
Anim Cogn. 2025 Jul 10;28(1):57. doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-01979-6.
2
What Are the Most Prevalent Welfare Issues for Pet Small Mammals?宠物小型哺乳动物最普遍的福利问题有哪些?
Animals (Basel). 2025 May 14;15(10):1423. doi: 10.3390/ani15101423.
3
Positive effect of a diggable substrate on the behaviour of a captive naked mole rat colony.可挖掘基质对圈养裸鼹鼠群体行为的积极影响。

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in Anticipatory Behaviour between Rats (Rattus norvegicus) Housed in Standard versus Semi-Naturalistic Laboratory Environments.饲养在标准实验室环境与半自然主义实验室环境中的大鼠(褐家鼠)预期行为的差异
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 28;11(1):e0147595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147595. eCollection 2016.
2
Microinterventions targeting regulatory focus and regulatory fit selectively reduce dysphoric and anxious mood.针对调节焦点和调节适配的微观干预措施能够选择性地减轻烦躁和焦虑情绪。
Behav Res Ther. 2015 Sep;72:18-29. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
3
Food neophobia in wild and laboratory rats (multi-strain comparison).
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 29;14(1):20138. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64146-w.
4
Double-decker cage reduces mount frequency and ejaculation latency, resulting in reduced weight loss in male rats after mating behavior.双层笼减少了交配行为后雄性大鼠的配种频率和射精潜伏期,从而减少了体重下降。
Exp Anim. 2024 Oct 23;73(4):412-420. doi: 10.1538/expanim.24-0026. Epub 2024 May 30.
5
Optimizing environmental enrichment for Sprague Dawley rats: Exemplary insights into the liver proteome.优化 Sprague Dawley 大鼠的环境丰容:对肝蛋白质组学的典型见解。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0297497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297497. eCollection 2024.
6
Fully implanted battery-free high power platform for chronic spinal and muscular functional electrical stimulation.全植入式免电池高能平台,用于慢性脊髓和肌肉功能性电刺激。
Nat Commun. 2023 Nov 30;14(1):7887. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43669-2.
7
Research Animal Behavioral Management Programs for the 21st Century.21世纪实验动物行为管理计划
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jun 8;13(12):1919. doi: 10.3390/ani13121919.
8
Climbing behavior by mice as an endpoint for preclinical assessment of drug effects in the absence and presence of pain.在有无疼痛的情况下,将小鼠的攀爬行为作为药物作用临床前评估的一个终点指标。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023 Apr 17;4:1150236. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1150236. eCollection 2023.
9
Rodents Prefer Going Downhill All the Way (Gravitaxis) Instead of Taking an Uphill Task.啮齿动物更喜欢一路下坡(重力趋性),而不是承担上坡任务。
Biology (Basel). 2022 Jul 21;11(7):1090. doi: 10.3390/biology11071090.
10
Developing guidelines for pet rat housing through expert consultation.通过专家咨询制定宠物鼠饲养指南。
Vet Rec. 2023 Feb;192(3):e1839. doi: 10.1002/vetr.1839. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
野生和实验大鼠的食物新恐惧症(多品系比较)。
Behav Processes. 2015 Apr;113:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.12.005. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
4
Searching for behavioral indicators of welfare in zoos: uncovering anticipatory behavior.寻找动物园中动物福利的行为指标:揭示预期行为。
Zoo Biol. 2014 Jul-Aug;33(4):251-6. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21144. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
5
A theoretically based model of rat personality with implications for welfare.一个基于理论的大鼠个性模型及其对福利的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 22;9(4):e95135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095135. eCollection 2014.
6
Predicting how individuals approach enrichment: regulatory focus in cotton-top tamarins (Sanguinus oedipus).预测个体如何进行丰富化活动:棉顶狨猴(红背松鼠猴)的调节焦点
Zoo Biol. 2013 Jul-Aug;32(4):427-35. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21075. Epub 2013 May 6.
7
Species specific behavioural patterns (digging and swimming) and reaction to novel objects in wild type, Wistar, Sprague-Dawley and Brown Norway rats.野生型、Wistar、Sprague-Dawley 和 Brown Norway 大鼠的特定物种行为模式(挖掘和游泳)和对新物体的反应。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040642. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
8
Evidence for individual differences in regulatory focus in rats, Rattus norvegicus.大鼠(褐家鼠)调节焦点个体差异的证据。
J Comp Psychol. 2012 Nov;126(4):347-54. doi: 10.1037/a0027244. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
9
Pandiculation: nature's way of maintaining the functional integrity of the myofascial system?打哈欠伸懒腰:维持肌筋膜系统功能完整性的自然方式?
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2011 Jul;15(3):268-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.12.006. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
10
On yawning and its functions.论打哈欠及其功能。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1997 Jun;4(2):198-207. doi: 10.3758/BF03209394.