• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大鼠(褐家鼠)调节焦点个体差异的证据。

Evidence for individual differences in regulatory focus in rats, Rattus norvegicus.

作者信息

Franks Becca, Higgins E Tory, Champagne Frances A

机构信息

Department of Psychology. Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.

出版信息

J Comp Psychol. 2012 Nov;126(4):347-54. doi: 10.1037/a0027244. Epub 2012 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1037/a0027244
PMID:22390620
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3386359/
Abstract

Regulatory focus (Higgins, 1997) builds on the classic approach-avoidance distinction by identifying two important approach orientations: the promotion focus (approaching gains and attainment) and the prevention focus (approaching nonlosses and safety). Though individual differences in regulatory focus have been widely studied in human psychology, it is unknown if such differences exist in other species. To explore this possibility, we designed a series of tests for laboratory rats, paralleling human regulatory focus research on risk taking. In home-cage tests, rats (N = 23) were given an opportunity to prevent a loss by burying a noxious novel object. In solitary tests in a novel enclosure, the same rats had the opportunity to pursue gains (food rewards) and/or safety (darkness). Rats demonstrated stable individual differences on both tests (p's < .001). Complementing the human research, duration of time spent with the noxious novel object was predicted by an individual's tendency to pursue safety (p < .01) and not by the tendency to pursue gains (p > .8). Some aspects of these results were compatible with alternative approaches, such as the bold-shy axis and "if-then" personality profiles (Mischel & Shoda, 1995). Regulatory focus theory, however, was uniquely able to predict the overall pattern, which may be an indication that it could contribute to future research in animal personality, motivation, and welfare.

摘要

调节焦点理论(希金斯,1997)建立在经典的趋避区分之上,它识别出两种重要的趋近取向:促进焦点(趋近收益和成就)和预防焦点(趋近无损失和安全)。尽管调节焦点的个体差异在人类心理学中已得到广泛研究,但在其他物种中是否存在这种差异尚不清楚。为了探究这种可能性,我们为实验大鼠设计了一系列测试,类似于人类关于冒险行为的调节焦点研究。在笼内测试中,大鼠(N = 23)有机会通过掩埋一个有害的新物体来避免损失。在新环境中的单独测试中,同样的大鼠有机会追求收益(食物奖励)和/或安全(黑暗)。大鼠在这两项测试中都表现出稳定的个体差异(p值 <.001)。与人类研究相辅相成的是,与有害新物体相处的时间长短是由个体追求安全的倾向预测的(p <.01),而不是由追求收益的倾向预测的(p >.8)。这些结果的某些方面与其他方法相符,比如大胆-胆小轴和“如果-那么”人格概况(米歇尔和肖达,1995)。然而,调节焦点理论能够独特地预测整体模式,这可能表明它有助于未来在动物个性、动机和福利方面的研究。

相似文献

1
Evidence for individual differences in regulatory focus in rats, Rattus norvegicus.大鼠(褐家鼠)调节焦点个体差异的证据。
J Comp Psychol. 2012 Nov;126(4):347-54. doi: 10.1037/a0027244. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
2
A theoretically based model of rat personality with implications for welfare.一个基于理论的大鼠个性模型及其对福利的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 22;9(4):e95135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095135. eCollection 2014.
3
Predicting how individuals approach enrichment: regulatory focus in cotton-top tamarins (Sanguinus oedipus).预测个体如何进行丰富化活动:棉顶狨猴(红背松鼠猴)的调节焦点
Zoo Biol. 2013 Jul-Aug;32(4):427-35. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21075. Epub 2013 May 6.
4
Individual differences in rat sensitivity to CO2.大鼠对 CO2 敏感性的个体差异。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):e0245347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245347. eCollection 2021.
5
Promotion and prevention focus on alternative hypotheses: implications for attributional functions.促进与预防聚焦于替代性假设:对归因功能的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Jan;80(1):5-18.
6
"Spatial memory in Long Evans and Rattus Norvegicus rats".
Biol Res. 2003;36(2):193-9. doi: 10.4067/s0716-97602003000200009.
7
Motion perception in rats (Rattus norvegicus sp.): deficits in albino Wistar rats compared to pigmented Long-Evans rats.大鼠(褐家鼠)的运动感知:白化Wistar大鼠与有色Long-Evans大鼠相比存在缺陷。
Behav Brain Res. 2006 Jun 3;170(1):29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.01.022. Epub 2006 Mar 24.
8
Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment: regulatory focus and the "goal looms larger" effect.目标达成过程中的趋近与回避强度:调节焦点与“目标凸显”效应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Nov;75(5):1115-31. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.5.1115.
9
Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes: a review and meta-analysis.调节焦点与工作相关结果:综述与元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2012 Sep;138(5):998-1034. doi: 10.1037/a0027723. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
10
Rats (Rattus norvegicus) modulate eating speed and vigilance to optimize food consumption: effects of cover, circadian rhythm, food deprivation, and individual differences.大鼠(褐家鼠)会调节进食速度和警觉性以优化食物摄入量:隐蔽处、昼夜节律、食物剥夺及个体差异的影响。
J Comp Psychol. 1992 Dec;106(4):411-9. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.106.4.411.

引用本文的文献

1
Toggling between food-seeking and self-preservation behaviors via hypothalamic response networks.通过下丘脑反应网络在觅食行为和自我保护行为之间切换。
Neuron. 2023 Sep 20;111(18):2899-2917.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.06.006. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
2
Individual differences in rat sensitivity to CO2.大鼠对 CO2 敏感性的个体差异。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):e0245347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245347. eCollection 2021.
3
The importance of burrowing, climbing and standing upright for laboratory rats.挖掘、攀爬和直立对实验大鼠的重要性。
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Jun 29;3(6):160136. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160136. eCollection 2016 Jun.
4
Effects of Degree and Timing of Social Housing on Reversal Learning and Response to Novel Objects in Dairy Calves.社会住房程度和时间对奶牛犊逆向学习及对新物体反应的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 14;10(8):e0132828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132828. eCollection 2015.
5
Truth, control, and value motivations: the "what," "how," and "why" of approach and avoidance.真相、控制和价值动机:趋近与回避的“是什么”“如何做”和“为什么”
Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 Oct 14;8:194. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00194. eCollection 2014.
6
A theoretically based model of rat personality with implications for welfare.一个基于理论的大鼠个性模型及其对福利的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 22;9(4):e95135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095135. eCollection 2014.
7
How enrichment affects exploration trade-offs in rats: implications for welfare and well-being.丰富环境如何影响大鼠的探索权衡:对福利和幸福感的启示。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 23;8(12):e83578. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083578. eCollection 2013.

本文引用的文献

1
Regulatory fit and health behavior.调节适配与健康行为。
Psychol Health. 2008;23(3):327-46. doi: 10.1080/14768320701360385.
2
Enrichment and individual differences affect welfare indicators in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus).富集和个体差异影响松鼠猴(松鼠猴属)的福利指标。
J Comp Psychol. 2011 Aug;125(3):347-52. doi: 10.1037/a0024294.
3
The role of prevention-oriented attitudes towards nature in people's judgment of new applications of genomics techniques in soil ecology.预防导向的自然观在人们对土壤生态学中基因组技术新应用的判断中的作用。
Public Underst Sci. 2010 Nov;19(6):654-68. doi: 10.1177/0963662509342473.
4
Shyness and boldness in humans and other animals.人类和其他动物的害羞和大胆。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1994 Nov;9(11):442-6. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90134-1.
5
When risk seeking becomes a motivational necessity.当冒险寻求成为一种必要的激励因素时。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Aug;99(2):215-31. doi: 10.1037/a0019715.
6
Personality traits and dispersal tendency in the invasive mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis).入侵性食蚊鱼( Gambusia affinis )的个性特征和扩散倾向。
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 May 22;277(1687):1571-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2128. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
7
Are fast explorers slow reactors? Linking personality type and anti-predator behaviour.快速探索者是慢反应者吗?人格类型与抗捕食行为的联系。
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Feb 22;277(1681):625-32. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1607. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
8
Motivations for prevention or promotion following social exclusion: being rejected versus being ignored.社会排斥后预防或促进的动机:被拒绝与被忽视。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Feb;96(2):415-431. doi: 10.1037/a0012958.
9
Novel environmental enrichment may provide a tool for rapid assessment of animal personality: a case study with giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca).新型环境富集可为快速评估动物个性提供一种工具:以大熊猫(Ailuropoda melanoleuca)为例的研究
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2008;11(4):301-18. doi: 10.1080/10888700802329673.
10
Making message recipients "feel right": how nonverbal cues can increase persuasion.让信息接收者“感觉良好”:非语言线索如何增强说服力。
Psychol Sci. 2008 May;19(5):415-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02102.x.