Tsimokha Anna S, Zaykova Julia J, Bottrill Andrew, Barlev Nikolai A
Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Department of Biochemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
J Cell Physiol. 2017 Apr;232(4):842-851. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25492. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
Proteasome-mediated proteolysis is critical for regulation of vast majority of cellular processes. In addition to their well-documented functions in the nucleus and cytoplasm proteasomes have also been found in extracellular space. The origin and functions of these proteasomes, dubbed as circulating/plasmatic or extracellular proteasomes, are unclear. To gain insights into the molecular and functional differences between extracellular (EPs) and cellular proteasomes (CPs) we compared their subunit composition using iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomics (iTRAQ LC/MS-MS). Our analysis of purified from K562 cells or conditioned medium intact proteasome complexes led to an identification and quantification of 114 proteins, out of which 19 were 26S proteasome proteins (all subunits of the 20S proteasome and a small number of the 19S regulatory particle proteins), and 3 belonged to the ubiquitin system. Sixty-two of proteasome interacting proteins (PIPs) were differentially represented in CP versus EP, with folds difference ranging from 1.5 to 4.8. The bioinformatics analysis revealed that functionally most of EP-PIPs were associated with protein biosynthesis and, unlike CP-PIPs, were under represented by chaperon/ATP-binding proteins. Identities of some of the proteasome proteins and PIPs were verified by Western blotting. Importantly, we uncovered that the stoichiometry of the 20S versus 19S complexes in the extracellular proteasomes was different compared to the one calculated for the intracellular proteasomes. Specifically, the EP prep contained only three 19S subunits versus at least 18 in the CP one, suggesting that the extracellular proteasomes are deficient in 19S complexes, which may imply that they have special biological functions. J. Cell. Physiol. 232: 842-851, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
蛋白酶体介导的蛋白水解对于绝大多数细胞过程的调控至关重要。除了在细胞核和细胞质中具有充分记录的功能外,蛋白酶体在细胞外空间也有发现。这些被称为循环/血浆或细胞外蛋白酶体的蛋白酶体的起源和功能尚不清楚。为了深入了解细胞外(EPs)和细胞内蛋白酶体(CPs)之间的分子和功能差异,我们使用基于iTRAQ的定量蛋白质组学(iTRAQ LC/MS-MS)比较了它们的亚基组成。我们对从K562细胞或条件培养基中纯化的完整蛋白酶体复合物进行分析,鉴定并定量了114种蛋白质,其中19种是26S蛋白酶体蛋白(20S蛋白酶体的所有亚基和少量19S调节颗粒蛋白),3种属于泛素系统。62种蛋白酶体相互作用蛋白(PIPs)在CP和EP中的表达存在差异,倍数差异范围为1.5至4.8。生物信息学分析表明,在功能上,大多数EP-PIPs与蛋白质生物合成相关,与CP-PIPs不同的是,它们中伴侣蛋白/ATP结合蛋白的含量较低。一些蛋白酶体蛋白和PIPs的身份通过蛋白质印迹法得到验证。重要的是,我们发现细胞外蛋白酶体中20S与19S复合物的化学计量与细胞内蛋白酶体计算的化学计量不同。具体而言,EP制剂仅包含三个19S亚基,而CP制剂中至少有18个,这表明细胞外蛋白酶体缺乏19S复合物,这可能意味着它们具有特殊的生物学功能。《细胞生理学杂志》232: 842 - 851, 2017。© 2016威利期刊公司