Suppr超能文献

限制检索的目标导向机制预测对新“陪衬”信息的后续记忆。

Goal-directed mechanisms that constrain retrieval predict subsequent memory for new "foil" information.

作者信息

Vogelsang David A, Bonnici Heidi M, Bergström Zara M, Ranganath Charan, Simons Jon S

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK; Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EB, UK.

School of Psychology, Keynes College, University of Kent, UK.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2016 Aug;89:356-363. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.016. Epub 2016 Jul 16.

Abstract

To remember a previous event, it is often helpful to use goal-directed control processes to constrain what comes to mind during retrieval. Behavioral studies have demonstrated that incidental learning of new "foil" words in a recognition test is superior if the participant is trying to remember studied items that were semantically encoded compared to items that were non-semantically encoded. Here, we applied subsequent memory analysis to fMRI data to understand the neural mechanisms underlying the "foil effect". Participants encoded information during deep semantic and shallow non-semantic tasks and were tested in a subsequent blocked memory task to examine how orienting retrieval towards different types of information influences the incidental encoding of new words presented as foils during the memory test phase. To assess memory for foils, participants performed a further surprise old/new recognition test involving foil words that were encountered during the previous memory test blocks as well as completely new words. Subsequent memory effects, distinguishing successful versus unsuccessful incidental encoding of foils, were observed in regions that included the left inferior frontal gyrus and posterior parietal cortex. The left inferior frontal gyrus exhibited disproportionately larger subsequent memory effects for semantic than non-semantic foils, and significant overlap in activity during semantic, but not non-semantic, initial encoding and foil encoding. The results suggest that orienting retrieval towards different types of foils involves re-implementing the neurocognitive processes that were involved during initial encoding.

摘要

为了回忆之前的事件,使用目标导向的控制过程来限制检索过程中浮现的内容通常会有所帮助。行为研究表明,在识别测试中,新的“干扰”词的偶然学习效果更好,如果参与者试图记住经过语义编码的学习项目,而不是非语义编码的项目。在这里,我们对功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据应用后续记忆分析,以了解“干扰效应”背后的神经机制。参与者在深度语义和浅层非语义任务中对信息进行编码,并在随后的分块记忆任务中接受测试,以研究将检索导向不同类型的信息如何影响在记忆测试阶段作为干扰项呈现的新单词的偶然编码。为了评估对干扰项的记忆,参与者进行了进一步的意外旧/新识别测试,其中包括在前一个记忆测试块中遇到的干扰词以及全新的单词。在包括左下额叶回和顶叶后皮质的区域中观察到了区分干扰项成功与不成功偶然编码的后续记忆效应。左下额叶回对语义干扰项的后续记忆效应比对非语义干扰项的后续记忆效应大得多,并在语义初始编码和干扰项编码期间(而非非语义初始编码和干扰项编码期间)的活动中存在显著重叠。结果表明,将检索导向不同类型的干扰项涉及重新执行初始编码期间所涉及的神经认知过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e5/5010040/a741431cce7c/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验