Cushman Phoebe A, Liebschutz Jane M, Anderson Bradley J, Moreau Merredith R, Stein Michael D
General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Crosstown 2nd Floor, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Boston, MA, USA, 02118.
General Internal Medicine, Butler Hospital, 345 Blackstone Blvd., Providence, RI, USA, 02906.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Sep;68:68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
Buprenorphine has established effectiveness for outpatient treatment of opioid use disorder. Our previously published STOP (Suboxone Transition to Opiate Program) trial showed that buprenorphine induction, stabilization, and linkage to outpatient treatment in opioid-dependent inpatients (injection and non-injection drug users) decreased illicit opioid use over 6months. The present study was a planned subgroup analysis of injection opiate users from STOP.
To determine if inpatient buprenorphine initiation and linkage to outpatient buprenorphine reduce injection opiate users' frequency of injection opiate use (IOU).
Inpatient injection opiate users at a safety-net hospital were randomized to buprenorphine linkage (induction, stabilization, bridge prescription, and facilitated referral to outpatient treatment) or detoxification (5-day inpatient buprenorphine taper). Conditional fixed-effects Poisson regression was used to estimate the effects of intervention on 30-day (self-report) at 1, 3, and 6months, measured using 30-day timeline follow-back. The secondary outcome was linkage effectiveness, measured as % presenting to initial outpatient buprenorphine visits after hospital discharge.
Analysis was limited to persons (n=62 randomized to detoxification and n=51 to linkage) with baseline IOU. There were no significant differences in age, ethnicity, or baseline IOU frequency. At follow-up, linkage patients (70.6%) were significantly more likely (p<0.001) to present to initial buprenorphine visits than detoxification patients (9.7%). However, there was no significant between group difference in the rate of IOU at 1- (IRR=0.73, p=0.32), 3- (IRR=1.20, p=0.54), or 6-month (IRR=0.73, p=0.23) follow-ups. Using person-day analysis, participants self-reported IOU on 5.8% of follow-up days in which they used prescription buprenorphine and 37.5% of non-buprenorphine days. Using a generalized estimating equation, the estimated odds of IOU was 4.57 times higher (p<0.001) on non-buprenorphine days.
Despite STOP's success in linking patients who inject opiates to outpatient buprenorphine, the intervention did not significantly decrease their IOU frequency. Injection opiate users will require a more intensive protocol to sustain outpatient buprenorphine treatment and decrease injection with its attendant risks.
丁丙诺啡已被证实对门诊阿片类药物使用障碍的治疗有效。我们之前发表的STOP(丁丙诺啡过渡到阿片类药物项目)试验表明,在阿片类药物依赖的住院患者(注射和非注射吸毒者)中,丁丙诺啡的诱导、稳定治疗以及与门诊治疗的衔接,在6个月内减少了非法阿片类药物的使用。本研究是对STOP试验中注射阿片类药物使用者的一项计划亚组分析。
确定住院患者开始使用丁丙诺啡并与门诊丁丙诺啡治疗相衔接是否能降低注射阿片类药物使用者的注射阿片类药物使用频率(IOU)。
在一家安全网医院的住院注射阿片类药物使用者被随机分为丁丙诺啡衔接组(诱导、稳定治疗、桥梁处方以及协助转诊至门诊治疗)或戒毒组(5天住院丁丙诺啡递减治疗)。使用条件固定效应泊松回归来估计干预在1个月、3个月和6个月时对30天(自我报告)的影响,采用30天时间线随访回溯法进行测量。次要结局是衔接有效性,以出院后首次门诊丁丙诺啡就诊的比例来衡量。
分析限于有基线IOU的患者(62例随机分配至戒毒组,51例随机分配至衔接组)。在年龄、种族或基线IOU频率方面无显著差异。随访时,衔接组患者(70.6%)比戒毒组患者(9.7%)更有可能(p<0.001)前往首次丁丙诺啡就诊。然而,在1个月(IRR=0.73,p=0.32)、3个月(IRR=1.20,p=0.54)或6个月(IRR=0.73,p=0.23)随访时,两组间IOU发生率无显著差异。使用人日分析,参与者在使用处方丁丙诺啡的随访日中有5.8%自我报告有IOU,在未使用丁丙诺啡的日子中有37.5%自我报告有IOU。使用广义估计方程,在未使用丁丙诺啡的日子里,IOU的估计比值高4.57倍(p<0.001)。
尽管STOP试验成功地将注射阿片类药物的患者与门诊丁丙诺啡治疗相衔接,但该干预并未显著降低他们的IOU频率。注射阿片类药物使用者将需要更强化的方案来维持门诊丁丙诺啡治疗并降低注射及其伴随风险。