Suppr超能文献

比较丁丙诺啡维持治疗中的行为治疗条件。

Comparison of behavioral treatment conditions in buprenorphine maintenance.

机构信息

Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Addiction. 2013 Oct;108(10):1788-98. doi: 10.1111/add.12266. Epub 2013 Jul 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The Controlled Substances Act requires physicians in the United States to provide or refer to behavioral treatment when treating opioid-dependent individuals with buprenorphine; however, no research has examined the combination of buprenorphine with different types of behavioral treatments. This randomized controlled trial compared the effectiveness of four behavioral treatment conditions provided with buprenorphine and medical management (MM) for the treatment of opioid dependence.

DESIGN

After a 2-week buprenorphine induction/stabilization phase, participants were randomized to one of four behavioral treatment conditions provided for 16 weeks: cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT = 53); contingency management (CM = 49); both CBT and CM (CBT + CM = 49); and no additional behavioral treatment (NT = 51).

SETTING

Study activities occurred at an out-patient clinical research center in Los Angeles, California, USA.

PARTICIPANTS

Included were 202 male and female opioid-dependent participants.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary outcome was opioid use, measured as a proportion of opioid-negative urine results over the number of tests possible. Secondary outcomes include retention, withdrawal symptoms, craving, other drug use and adverse events.

FINDINGS

No group differences in opioid use were found for the behavioral treatment phase (χ2  = 1.25, P = 0.75), for a second medication-only treatment phase, or at weeks 40 and 52 follow-ups. Analyses revealed no differences across groups for any secondary outcome.

CONCLUSION

There remains no clear evidence that cognitive behavioural therapy and contingency management reduce opiate use when added to buprenorphine and medical management in opiate users seeking treatment.

摘要

背景与目的

《受控物质法案》要求美国的医生在为阿片类药物依赖者开丁丙诺啡时提供或转介行为治疗;然而,没有研究调查丁丙诺啡与不同类型的行为治疗相结合的效果。本随机对照试验比较了在丁丙诺啡和医疗管理(MM)治疗下,四种行为治疗条件与丁丙诺啡联合使用的治疗阿片类药物依赖的效果。

设计

在为期 2 周的丁丙诺啡诱导/稳定阶段后,参与者被随机分配到四种行为治疗条件之一,为期 16 周:认知行为疗法(CBT=53);效控管理(CM=49);CBT 和 CM 联合(CBT+CM=49);无额外的行为治疗(NT=51)。

地点

研究活动在加利福尼亚州洛杉矶的一个门诊临床研究中心进行。

参与者

纳入 202 名男性和女性阿片类药物依赖者。

测量

主要结果是阿片类药物的使用,以尿液检测中阿片类药物阴性的比例来衡量。次要结果包括保留率、戒断症状、渴望、其他药物使用和不良事件。

结果

在行为治疗阶段(χ2=1.25,P=0.75)、第二个仅药物治疗阶段,或在第 40 周和第 52 周随访时,各治疗组之间在阿片类药物使用方面没有差异。分析显示,在任何次要结果上,各组之间没有差异。

结论

在寻求治疗的阿片类药物使用者中,当丁丙诺啡和医疗管理中添加认知行为疗法和效控管理时,并没有明确的证据表明这两种方法能减少阿片类药物的使用。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Capturing the Full Range of Buprenorphine Treatment Response.全面捕捉丁丙诺啡治疗反应的范围。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 1;82(2):201-203. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.3836.

本文引用的文献

6
Are theories of learning necessary?学习理论是必要的吗?
Psychol Rev. 1950 Jul;57(4):193-216. doi: 10.1037/h0054367.
9
The Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS).临床阿片戒断量表(COWS)。
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2003 Apr-Jun;35(2):253-9. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2003.10400007.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验