Emery Jon D, Jefford Michael, King Madeleine, Hayne Dickon, Martin Andrew, Doorey Juanita, Hyatt Amelia, Habgood Emily, Lim Tee, Hawks Cynthia, Pirotta Marie, Trevena Lyndal, Schofield Penelope
Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Vic., Australia.
Western Health and the Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
BJU Int. 2017 Mar;119(3):381-389. doi: 10.1111/bju.13593. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
To test the feasibility and efficacy of a multifaceted model of shared care for men after completion of treatment for prostate cancer.
Men who had completed treatment for low- to moderate-risk prostate cancer within the previous 8 weeks were eligible. Participants were randomized to usual care or shared care. Shared care entailed substituting two hospital visits with three visits in primary care, a survivorship care plan, recall and reminders, and screening for distress and unmet needs. Outcome measures included psychological distress, prostate cancer-specific quality of life, satisfaction and preferences for care and healthcare resource use.
A total of 88 men were randomized (shared care n = 45; usual care n = 43). There were no clinically important or statistically significant differences between groups with regard to distress, prostate cancer-specific quality of life or satisfaction with care. At the end of the trial, men in the intervention group were significantly more likely to prefer a shared care model to hospital follow-up than those in the control group (intervention 63% vs control 24%; P<0.001). There was high compliance with prostate-specific antigen monitoring in both groups. The shared care model was cheaper than usual care (shared care AUS$1411; usual care AUS$1728; difference AUS$323 [plausible range AUS$91-554]).
Well-structured shared care for men with low- to moderate-risk prostate cancer is feasible and appears to produce clinically similar outcomes to those of standard care, at a lower cost.
检验前列腺癌治疗结束后针对男性的多方面共享照护模式的可行性和有效性。
符合条件的男性为在过去8周内完成低至中度风险前列腺癌治疗者。参与者被随机分为常规照护组或共享照护组。共享照护包括用三次初级保健就诊替代两次医院就诊、一份生存照护计划、召回与提醒,以及对痛苦和未满足需求的筛查。结局指标包括心理痛苦、前列腺癌特异性生活质量、对照护的满意度和偏好以及医疗资源使用情况。
共有88名男性被随机分组(共享照护组n = 45;常规照护组n = 43)。两组在痛苦、前列腺癌特异性生活质量或对照护的满意度方面,均未发现具有临床重要意义或统计学显著差异。在试验结束时,干预组男性比对照组男性更倾向于选择共享照护模式而非医院随访(干预组63% vs对照组24%;P<0.001)。两组对前列腺特异性抗原监测的依从性都很高。共享照护模式比常规照护更便宜(共享照护1411澳元;常规照护1728澳元;差值323澳元[合理范围91 - 554澳元])。
针对低至中度风险前列腺癌男性的精心构建的共享照护是可行的,并且似乎能以更低的成本产生与标准照护在临床上相似的结果。