• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿瘤学家和全科医生对结直肠癌幸存者共享护理的看法:一项定性研究。

Oncologist and General Practitioner Perspectives of Shared Care for Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Lisy Karolina, Tieu Matthew, Gore Claire, Schofield Penelope, Chan Raymond J, Emery Jon, Martin Andrew, De Abreu Lourenco Richard, Jefford Michael

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2025 Jul;34(7):e70223. doi: 10.1002/pon.70223.

DOI:10.1002/pon.70223
PMID:40650913
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12255378/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a growing body of evidence to support shared survivorship care. The shared care of colorectal cancer survivors (SCORE) randomised controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated that shared care is an appropriate and cost-effective model. Understanding the perspectives of oncologists and general practitioners (GPs) who participated in SCORE will provide crucial insights to support wider implementation of shared care and adoption into clinical practice.

AIMS

To explore the experiences of oncologists and GPs who provided shared survivorship care for colorectal cancer survivors within the SCORE RCT, focussing on perceptions of acceptability and appropriateness of shared care, and facilitators and barriers to implementation.

METHODS

This qualitative descriptive study utilised semi-structured interviews for data collection. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, and data analysed by hybrid deductive/inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Interviews from 20 HCPs (13 GPs and 7 oncologists) were analysed. Seven themes were developed describing overall acceptance of the shared care model, the importance and challenges regarding bilateral communication between providers, mixed views on the need for GP training, and patients suitable for shared care. The need to support GPs with a direct hospital-based contact person, as well as clear guidance on their role, was emphasised, as was the need for care coordination and logistical support.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study offers novel findings regarding shared care from the perspective of participants who have direct experience with delivering the model. While shared care was broadly supported by both GPs and specialists, successful implementation requires agreed-upon bilateral communication, clear guidance for GPs, and coordination support.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Shared Care for Colorectal Cancer (SCORE) Trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12617000004369p. Registered on 3 January 2017; protocol version 4 approved 24 February 2017.

摘要

背景

越来越多的证据支持共同生存护理。结直肠癌幸存者共享护理(SCORE)随机对照试验(RCT)表明,共享护理是一种合适且具有成本效益的模式。了解参与SCORE试验的肿瘤学家和全科医生(GP)的观点,将为支持共享护理的更广泛实施并应用于临床实践提供关键见解。

目的

探讨在SCORE随机对照试验中为结直肠癌幸存者提供共同生存护理的肿瘤学家和全科医生的经验,重点关注对共享护理的可接受性和适当性的看法,以及实施的促进因素和障碍。

方法

这项定性描述性研究采用半结构化访谈收集数据。访谈进行录音和转录,并通过混合演绎/归纳主题分析对数据进行分析。

结果

对20名医疗保健人员(13名全科医生和7名肿瘤学家)的访谈进行了分析。确定了七个主题,描述了对共享护理模式的总体接受度、提供者之间双边沟通的重要性和挑战、对全科医生培训需求的不同看法,以及适合共享护理的患者。强调需要为全科医生提供一名直接的医院联系人,并对其角色给予明确指导,同时也需要护理协调和后勤支持。

结论

我们的研究从直接参与该模式实施的参与者角度提供了关于共享护理的新发现。虽然全科医生和专科医生都广泛支持共享护理,但成功实施需要商定的双边沟通、对全科医生的明确指导以及协调支持。

临床试验注册

结直肠癌共享护理(SCORE)试验已在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为ACTRN12617000004369p。于2017年1月3日注册;2月24日批准方案版本4。

相似文献

1
Oncologist and General Practitioner Perspectives of Shared Care for Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Study.肿瘤学家和全科医生对结直肠癌幸存者共享护理的看法:一项定性研究。
Psychooncology. 2025 Jul;34(7):e70223. doi: 10.1002/pon.70223.
2
Mixed-methods organizational evaluation of a physical activity programme for cancer survivors in primary care.对基层医疗中针对癌症幸存者的体育活动项目进行的混合方法组织评估。
Transl Behav Med. 2025 Jan 16;15(1). doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaf029.
3
Oncology Provider and Patient Perspectives on a Cardiovascular Health Assessment Tool Used During Posttreatment Survivorship Care in Community Oncology (Results from WF-1804CD): Mixed Methods Observational Study.肿瘤学提供者与患者对社区肿瘤治疗后生存护理期间使用的心血管健康评估工具的看法(WF-1804CD研究结果):混合方法观察性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 6;27:e65152. doi: 10.2196/65152.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Understanding "Alert Fatigue" in Primary Care: Qualitative Systematic Review of General Practitioners Attitudes and Experiences of Clinical Alerts, Prompts, and Reminders.理解基层医疗中的“警报疲劳”:对全科医生关于临床警报、提示和提醒的态度及经历的定性系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 7;27:e62763. doi: 10.2196/62763.
6
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
7
Acceptability of 'as needed' biologic therapy in psoriasis: insights from a multistakeholder mixed-methods study.“按需”生物疗法治疗银屑病的可接受性:来自多方利益相关者混合方法研究的见解。
Br J Dermatol. 2024 Jul 16;191(2):243-251. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae068.
8
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis.实施非专业卫生工作者项目以改善孕产妇和儿童健康服务可及性的障碍与促进因素:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 8;2013(10):CD010414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010414.pub2.
9
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
10
General Practitioners' Experiences With Implementing Colon or Prostate Cancer Survivorship Care in Primary Care: A Cross-Sectional Survey Nested Within Two Randomized-Controlled Trials.全科医生在初级保健中实施结肠癌或前列腺癌幸存者护理的经验:一项嵌套在两项随机对照试验中的横断面调查。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2025 Jun;21(6):773-780. doi: 10.1200/OP-24-00491. Epub 2024 Dec 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Organizing substitution of oncological follow-up to primary care: perspectives from secondary care providers.组织肿瘤学随访向初级保健的替代:二级保健提供者的观点。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Mar 6. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01764-x.
2
Prevalence of cancer survivors in the United States.美国癌症幸存者的患病率。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Nov 1;116(11):1784-1790. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae135.
3
Cancer in general practice research priorities in Australia.澳大利亚全科医学中的癌症研究重点。
Aust J Gen Pract. 2024 Apr;53(4):227-234. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-02-23-6699.
4
Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.2022 年全球癌症统计数据:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率全球估计数。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
5
Cancer follow-up in primary care after treatment with curative intent: Views of patients with breast and colorectal cancer.有治愈意图的治疗后初级保健中的癌症随访:乳腺癌和结直肠癌患者的观点。
Patient Educ Couns. 2024 May;122:108139. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108139. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
6
SCORE: a randomised controlled trial evaluating shared care (general practitioner and oncologist) follow-up compared to usual oncologist follow-up for survivors of colorectal cancer.评分:一项随机对照试验,评估与肿瘤学家常规随访相比,结直肠癌幸存者接受共享护理(全科医生和肿瘤学家)随访的情况。
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Nov 30;66:102346. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102346. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Colorectal cancer survivors' experiences and views of shared and telehealth models of survivorship care: A qualitative study.结直肠癌幸存者对共同和远程医疗生存护理模式的体验和看法:一项定性研究。
Psychooncology. 2024 Jan;33(1):e6265. doi: 10.1002/pon.6265. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
8
Acceptability of a shared cancer follow-up model of care between general practitioners and radiation oncologists: A qualitative evaluation.接受全科医生和放射肿瘤学家之间共享癌症随访护理模式:定性评估。
Health Expect. 2023 Dec;26(6):2441-2452. doi: 10.1111/hex.13846. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
9
Medical and nursing clinician perspectives on the usability of the hospital electronic medical record: A qualitative analysis.医疗和护理临床医生对医院电子病历可用性的看法:定性分析。
Health Inf Manag. 2024 Sep;53(3):189-197. doi: 10.1177/18333583231154624. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
10
Factors influencing the translation of shared cancer follow-up care into clinical practice: a systematic review.影响共享癌症随访护理转化为临床实践的因素:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 29;12(8):e055460. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055460.