Tsui Johnson F, Dixon Christopher M
Lenox Hill Hospital, 100 East 77th Street, New York, NY, 10075, USA.
Phelps Memorial Hospital, 777 North Broadway, Sleepy Hollow, NY, 10591, USA.
Curr Urol Rep. 2016 Sep;17(9):63. doi: 10.1007/s11934-016-0619-x.
The management of clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) remains a common problem in daily urologic practice. Recently, a new minimally invasive procedure for BPH, the Urolift System, has been introduced. This article reviews the current literature discussing the technique, efficacy, adverse events, limitations, and possible concerns. The existing data which includes a 3-month, sham-controlled multicenter trial with a subsequent 3-year follow-up indicates significant improvements in the outcome measures in particular urinary symptoms. The adverse event profile and reoperation rates are acceptable. A particular benefit includes the lack of negative effects on erectile or ejaculatory function. The procedure can be performed with minimal anesthesia, but is limited to lateral lobe enlargement as it is unsuitable for median lobe or central zone obstruction. Another potential drawback is the placement of permanent implants into the prostatic urethra. The adoption of this procedure will ultimately be determined by multiple factors including ease of use, patient satisfaction, durability, and reimbursement.
临床良性前列腺增生(BPH)的管理仍是日常泌尿外科实践中的常见问题。最近,一种用于BPH的新型微创手术——Urolift系统已被引入。本文回顾了当前讨论该技术、疗效、不良事件、局限性及可能问题的文献。现有数据包括一项为期3个月的假手术对照多中心试验及随后3年的随访,结果表明在结局指标尤其是尿路症状方面有显著改善。不良事件情况和再次手术率是可接受的。一个特别的好处是对勃起或射精功能没有负面影响。该手术可以在极少麻醉的情况下进行,但仅限于侧叶增大的情况,因为它不适用于中叶或中央区梗阻。另一个潜在缺点是将永久性植入物放置在前列腺尿道中。该手术的采用最终将由多个因素决定,包括易用性、患者满意度、耐用性和报销情况。