Suppr超能文献

根据三种根管冲洗技术对冲洗剂渗透情况的影像学评估

Radiological Evaluation of Penetration of the Irrigant according to Three Endodontic Irrigation Techniques.

作者信息

Dhaimy Said, Imdary Sara, Dhoum Sara, Benkiran Imane, El Ouazzani Amal

机构信息

School of Dentistry of Casablanca, Abou Al Alaa Zahar Street 21100, Mers Sultan, Casablanca, Morocco.

出版信息

Int J Dent. 2016;2016:3142742. doi: 10.1155/2016/3142742. Epub 2016 Jun 28.

Abstract

Introduction. This experimental study is to compare radiographs based on the penetration depth of the irrigant following three final irrigation techniques. Material and Method. A sample of sixty teeth with single roots were prepared with stainless steel K files followed by mechanized Ni-Ti files iRace® under irrigation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite. Radiopaque solution was utilized to measure the penetration depth of the irrigant. Three irrigation techniques were performed during this study: (i) passive irrigation, (ii) manually activated irrigation, and (iii) passive irrigation with an endodontic needle CANAL CLEAN®. Radiographs were performed to measure the length of irrigant penetration in each technique. Results. In comparison, passive irrigation with a conventional syringe showed infiltration of the irrigant by an average of 0.682 ± 0.105, whereas the manually activated irrigation technique indicated an average of 0.876 ± 0.066 infiltration. Irrigation with an endodontic syringe showed an average infiltration of 0.910 ± 0.043. The results revealed highly significant difference between the three irrigation techniques (α = 5%). Conclusion. Adding manual activation to the irrigant improved the result by 20%. This study indicates that passive irrigation with an endodontic needle has proved to be the most effective irrigation technique of the canal system.

摘要

引言。本实验研究旨在比较三种最终冲洗技术后冲洗液的渗透深度的X线片。材料与方法。选取60颗单根牙样本,先用不锈钢K锉预备,然后在2.5%次氯酸钠冲洗下,使用iRace®机械镍钛锉进行预备。使用不透射线溶液测量冲洗液的渗透深度。本研究期间进行了三种冲洗技术:(i)被动冲洗,(ii)手动激活冲洗,以及(iii)使用CANAL CLEAN®根管针进行被动冲洗。拍摄X线片以测量每种技术中冲洗液的渗透长度。结果。相比之下,使用传统注射器进行被动冲洗时,冲洗液的平均渗透深度为0.682±0.105,而手动激活冲洗技术的平均渗透深度为0.876±0.066。使用根管注射器冲洗的平均渗透深度为0.910±0.043。结果显示三种冲洗技术之间存在高度显著差异(α = 5%)。结论。对冲洗液进行手动激活可使效果提高20%。本研究表明,使用根管针进行被动冲洗已被证明是根管系统最有效的冲洗技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/385a/4940559/c1ab8bacf0c3/IJD2016-3142742.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验