Chen Yu-Wei Roy, Leung Janice M, Sin Don D
Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, Institute for Heart Lung Health at St. Paul's Hospital & Department of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 19;11(7):e0158843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158843. eCollection 2016.
The aims of this systematic review were to determine which blood-based molecules have been evaluated as possible biomarkers to diagnose chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations (AECOPD) and to ascertain the quality of these biomarker publications. Patients of interest were those that have been diagnosed with COPD. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases were searched systematically through February 2015 for publications relating to AECOPD diagnostic biomarkers. We used a modified guideline for the REporting of tumor MARKer Studies (mREMARK) to assess study quality. Additional components of quality included the reporting of findings in a replication cohort and the use of receiver-operating characteristics area-under-the curve statistics in evaluating performance. 59 studies were included, in which the most studied biomarkers were C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). CRP showed consistent elevations in AECOPD compared to control subjects, while IL-6 and TNF-α had variable statistical significance and results. mREMARK scores ranged from 6 to 18 (median score of 13). 12 articles reported ROC analyses and only one study employed a replication cohort to confirm biomarker performance. Studies of AECOPD diagnostic biomarkers remain inconsistent in their reporting, with few studies employing ROC analyses and even fewer demonstrating replication in independent cohorts.
本系统评价的目的是确定哪些血液中的分子已被评估为诊断慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)的潜在生物标志物,并确定这些生物标志物相关出版物的质量。纳入的研究对象为已确诊患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病的患者。通过对MEDLINE、EMBASE和CINAHL数据库进行系统检索,直至2015年2月,查找与AECOPD诊断生物标志物相关的出版物。我们使用了改良的肿瘤标志物研究报告指南(mREMARK)来评估研究质量。质量的其他组成部分包括在复制队列中报告研究结果以及在评估性能时使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积统计方法。共纳入59项研究,其中研究最多的生物标志物是C反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)。与对照组相比,CRP在AECOPD患者中呈现持续升高,而IL-6和TNF-α的统计学意义和结果存在差异。mREMARK评分范围为6至18分(中位数为13分)。12篇文章报告了ROC分析,只有一项研究采用复制队列来确认生物标志物的性能。AECOPD诊断生物标志物的研究报告仍然不一致,很少有研究采用ROC分析,在独立队列中进行重复验证的研究更少。