University of California , Berkeley, California 94720, United States.
Potential Energy, Berkeley, California 94704, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Aug 2;50(15):8393-9. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02899. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
Traditional smoky cooking fires are one of today's greatest environmental threats to human life. These fires, used by 40% of the global population, cause 3.9 million annual premature deaths. "Clean cookstoves" have potential to improve this situation; however, most cookstove programs do not employ objective measurement of adoption to inform design, marketing, subsidies, finance, or dissemination practices. Lack of data prevents insights and may contribute to consistently low adoption rates. In this study, we used sensors and surveys to measure objective versus self-reported adoption of freely-distributed cookstoves in an internally displaced persons camp in Darfur, Sudan. Our data insights demonstrate how to effectively measure and promote adoption, especially in a humanitarian crisis. With sensors, we measured that 71% of participants were cookstove "users" compared to 95% of respondents reporting the improved cookstove was their "primary cookstove." No line of survey questioning, whether direct or indirect, predicted sensor-measured usage. For participants who rarely or never used their cookstoves after initial dissemination ("non-users"), we found significant increases in adoption after a simple followup survey (p = 0.001). The followup converted 83% of prior "non-users" to "users" with average daily adoption of 1.7 cooking hours over 2.2 meals. This increased adoption, which we posit resulted from cookstove familiarization and social conformity, was sustained for a 2-week observation period post intervention.
传统的烟熏烹饪火是当今对人类生命最大的环境威胁之一。全球 40%的人口使用这些火源,导致每年有 390 万人过早死亡。“清洁炉灶”有潜力改善这种情况;然而,大多数炉灶项目没有采用客观的采用测量方法来为设计、营销、补贴、融资或传播实践提供信息。缺乏数据阻碍了深入了解情况,可能导致采用率始终较低。在这项研究中,我们使用传感器和调查来衡量在苏丹达尔富尔的一个境内流离失所者营地中自由分发的炉灶的客观采用情况与自我报告的采用情况。我们的数据洞察力展示了如何有效地衡量和促进采用,特别是在人道主义危机中。我们使用传感器测量到,与报告改进型炉灶是其“主要炉灶”的 95%的受访者相比,有 71%的参与者是炉灶“使用者”。无论直接还是间接的调查问题都无法预测传感器测量的使用情况。对于在最初分发后很少或从未使用过炉灶的参与者(“非使用者”),我们发现,简单的后续调查(p=0.001)后,采用率显著增加。后续调查将之前的“非使用者”中的 83%转化为“使用者”,平均每天使用炉灶烹饪 1.7 小时,做 2.2 餐。这种增加的采用率,我们认为是由于炉灶的熟悉度和社会从众心理导致的,在干预后 2 周的观察期内得以维持。