Suppr超能文献

与挪威以往治疗马蹄内翻足的方法相比,庞塞蒂方法。一项对205名儿童进行8至11年随访的多中心研究。

Ponseti method compared to previous treatment of clubfoot in Norway. A multicenter study of 205 children followed for 8-11 years.

作者信息

Sætersdal Christian, Fevang Jonas M, Bjørlykke John Asle, Engesæter Lars B

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021, Bergen, Norway.

Department of Pediatric Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

J Child Orthop. 2016 Oct;10(5):445-52. doi: 10.1007/s11832-016-0760-6. Epub 2016 Jul 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Despite few studies comparing Ponseti treatment and traditional treatment of clubfoot (talipes equinovarus), the Ponseti method is now accepted as standard treatment for this deformity. The Ponseti method was introduced in Norway in 2003 and the purpose of this multicenter-study was to compare the results of Ponseti treatment with the results of the previous treatment for clubfoot in Norway.

METHODS

90 children (134 clubfeet) treated with previous treatment (pre-Ponseti group), were compared to 115 Ponseti treated children (160 clubfeet) (Ponseti group). The previous treatment consisted of casting and surgery if needed. At 8-11 years of age, all children were examined by the same orthopaedic surgeon, the parents answered a questionnaire, all feet were X-rayed and information about surgical procedures was obtained from the patient records.

RESULTS

The number of surgeries was higher in the pre-Ponseti group, and the number of extensive surgeries was 119 in the pre-Ponseti group compared to 19 in the Ponseti group. The range of motion in the ankle joint was better in the Ponseti group. Children in this group had better function, higher satisfaction and less pain according to patient and parent reported outcome measures. The incidence of moderate or severe talar flattening was higher in the pre-Ponseti group.

CONCLUSION

Ponseti treatment seems to be superior to the previous treatment in Norway, with regards to number and severity of operations, flexibility of the foot and ankle, parent/patient reported outcome and the presence of talar flattening on X-ray.

摘要

目的

尽管比较庞塞蒂疗法与传统马蹄内翻足治疗方法的研究较少,但庞塞蒂方法现已被公认为这种畸形的标准治疗方法。庞塞蒂方法于2003年引入挪威,这项多中心研究的目的是比较庞塞蒂疗法的治疗结果与挪威此前马蹄内翻足治疗结果。

方法

将90名接受过此前治疗的儿童(134只患足)(庞塞蒂治疗前组)与115名接受庞塞蒂治疗的儿童(160只患足)(庞塞蒂组)进行比较。此前的治疗包括石膏固定以及必要时的手术。在8至11岁时,所有儿童均由同一位骨科医生进行检查,家长回答一份问卷,对所有患足进行X光检查,并从患者病历中获取有关手术程序的信息。

结果

庞塞蒂治疗前组的手术数量更多,该组的大型手术数量为119例,而庞塞蒂组为19例。庞塞蒂组踝关节的活动范围更好。根据患者和家长报告的结果指标,该组儿童功能更好、满意度更高且疼痛更少。庞塞蒂治疗前组中度或重度距骨扁平的发生率更高。

结论

在手术数量和严重程度、足踝关节灵活性、家长/患者报告的结果以及X光片上距骨扁平情况方面,庞塞蒂疗法似乎优于挪威此前的治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bda0/5033779/a17699153efd/11832_2016_760_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验