Agarwal Anil, Rastogi Anuj, Rastogi Prateek
Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Chacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalaya, Geeta Colony, Delhi, 110031, India.
Department of Orthopaedics, Integral Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Integral University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 May 2;18:199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.04.029. eCollection 2021 Jul.
The analysis determined the relapses in clubfoot children treated with Ponseti technique and standard bracing protocol and their correlation with overall follow up duration using pooled data from various series. It also tested the prescribed timelines of 5 and 7 years for slow-down/cessation of relapses in clubfoot children.
A systematic literature search was performed for articles published in "Pubmed (includes Medline indexed journals)" electronic databases using key words: "Clubfoot or CTEV or congenital talipes equinovarus", "Ponseti" for years 1 January 2001 to 15 November 2020. Included were studies that addressed treatment of idiopathic clubfoot using the standard Ponseti technique, followed a well defined brace protocol (maintenance of corrected deformity using a central bar based brace and prescribed duration mentioned), reported a minimum mean follow up of 4 years and having relapse as one of their outcome measure. Studies reporting Ponseti technique for non-idiopathic clubfoot, child's age older than 1 year at the time of primary treatment, clubfoot with previous interventions before Ponseti treatment, where relapse and residual deformities were not identified distinctly in follow up, abstract only publications, letter to the editors, case reports, technique papers and review articles were excluded. The following characteristics of clubfoot patients in the selected articles were included for analysis: Patient numbers/feet treated with Ponseti technique; follow up years (<5; 5-7 and >7 years; overall) and corresponding relapse percentages for patients.
There were total 2206 patients in the included 24 studies. Average follow up was 6 years. The average relapse rates for clubfoot patients in the pooled data stood at 30%. The overall relapse rates increased with a longer follow up and the curve befitted a linear regression equation with weak positive correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.08). The relapse rates in follow up categories of <5 years (26.6 ± 15.6%), 5-7 years (30.8 ± 16.3%) and >7 years (28.4 ± 6.2%) were similar statistically (Analysis of variance, ANOVA).
Approximately 1 in 3 clubfoot patients suffer relapse post Ponseti technique and standard bracing protocol. A weak positive correlation was observed for relapses when correlated with increasing follow up years. The relapses however tend to slow down after initial growth years. There is a need to educate the care receivers regarding the possibility of late relapses despite proper Ponseti treatment and accordingly to keep them under supervised follow up for longer periods.
本分析使用来自不同系列的汇总数据,确定采用Ponseti技术和标准支具方案治疗的马蹄内翻足患儿的复发情况及其与总体随访时间的相关性。它还测试了马蹄内翻足患儿复发减缓/停止的规定时间线(5年和7年)。
在“PubMed(包括Medline索引期刊)”电子数据库中,使用关键词“马蹄内翻足或先天性马蹄内翻足或先天性马蹄足畸形”、“Ponseti”,对2001年1月1日至2020年11月15日发表的文章进行系统的文献检索。纳入的研究包括使用标准Ponseti技术治疗特发性马蹄内翻足、遵循明确的支具方案(使用基于中央杆的支具维持矫正畸形并提及规定持续时间)、报告至少4年的平均随访且将复发作为其结局指标之一的研究。排除报告用于非特发性马蹄内翻足的Ponseti技术、初次治疗时患儿年龄大于1岁、Ponseti治疗前有过干预的马蹄内翻足、随访中未明确区分复发和残留畸形的研究、仅摘要出版物、给编辑的信、病例报告、技术论文和综述文章。纳入所选文章中马蹄内翻足患者的以下特征进行分析:采用Ponseti技术治疗的患者数量/足数;随访年份(<5年;5 - 7年和>7年;总体)以及相应患者的复发百分比。
纳入的24项研究共有2206例患者。平均随访时间为6年。汇总数据中马蹄内翻足患者的平均复发率为30%。总体复发率随随访时间延长而增加,曲线符合线性回归方程,呈弱正相关(Pearson相关系数 = 0.08)。<5年(26.6 ± 15.6%)、5 - 7年(30.8 ± 16.3%)和>7年(28.4 ± 6.2%)随访类别中的复发率在统计学上相似(方差分析)。
采用Ponseti技术和标准支具方案治疗后,约三分之一的马蹄内翻足患者会复发。复发与随访年份增加呈弱正相关。然而,复发在初始生长年后往往会减缓。有必要告知接受治疗者,尽管进行了适当的Ponseti治疗,仍有可能出现晚期复发,并相应地让他们接受更长时间的监督随访。