Abraham Jonathan, Wall Jon Cooper, Diab Michel, Beaver Cody
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, Lubbock, TX, United States.
Front Surg. 2021 May 28;8:668334. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.668334. eCollection 2021.
Ponseti casting has universally been accepted as the gold standard for treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. Conversely, primary treatment for non-idiopathic clubfoot has not been established. The purpose of this study is to compare treatment outcomes following primary soft tissue release (STR) and Ponseti casting of non-idiopathic clubfoot. An IRB-approved retrospective study of patients treated for non-idiopathic clubfoot between 2005 and 2020 was conducted. Patients were included if they began treatment before the age of 2 and had at least 1 year of follow up. Patients were placed into either the STR group or Ponseti group and variables of interest were documented including reoccurrence of deformity, number of surgeries performed, type of surgeries performed, anesthesia time, and surgery time. Data was analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. A total of 33 children with 57 neuromuscular/syndromic clubfoot were identified of which 9 (15 feet) were treated with STR and 24 (42 feet) were treated with Ponseti casting. Average anesthesia and surgery time were found to be 291 and 179 min, respectively, for the STR group, and 113 and 67 min for the Ponseti group. The difference in operating time was determined to be significant ( = 0.02, = 0.01). Patients treated with STR were found to have significantly more surgeries performed over the course of treatment than those treated with Ponseti casting ( = 0.001) with an average of 4.2 surgeries in the STR group and 1.5 surgeries in the Ponseti group. Extracapsular procedures were performed in 100% of the STR group and 97.6% of the Ponseti group ( = 0.55). Intracapsular procedures were performed in 100% of the STR group and 50% of the Ponseti group ( = 0.001). The Ponseti method should serve as the primary approach in the initial treatment of non-idiopathic clubfoot as it can reduce the risk of future invasive intracapsular surgery and shorten anesthesia and surgery times when surgical treatment is necessary. Level III retrospective case control study.
庞塞蒂石膏固定法已被普遍公认为治疗特发性马蹄内翻足的金标准。相反,非特发性马蹄内翻足的主要治疗方法尚未确立。本研究的目的是比较非特发性马蹄内翻足初次软组织松解(STR)和庞塞蒂石膏固定后的治疗效果。对2005年至2020年间接受非特发性马蹄内翻足治疗的患者进行了一项经机构审查委员会批准的回顾性研究。纳入标准为患者在2岁前开始治疗且至少有1年的随访。患者被分为STR组或庞塞蒂组,并记录相关变量,包括畸形复发情况、手术次数、手术类型、麻醉时间和手术时间。对连续变量的数据采用曼-惠特尼U检验进行分析。共确定了33例患有57只神经肌肉/综合征性马蹄内翻足的儿童,其中9例(15只足)接受了STR治疗,24例(42只足)接受了庞塞蒂石膏固定治疗。STR组的平均麻醉时间和手术时间分别为291分钟和179分钟,庞塞蒂组分别为113分钟和67分钟。手术时间差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.02,r = 0.01)。发现接受STR治疗的患者在治疗过程中进行的手术明显多于接受庞塞蒂石膏固定治疗的患者(P = 0.001),STR组平均手术4.2次,庞塞蒂组平均手术1.5次。STR组100%进行了关节囊外手术,庞塞蒂组97.6%进行了关节囊外手术(P = 0.55)。STR组100%进行了关节囊内手术,庞塞蒂组50%进行了关节囊内手术(P = 0.001)。庞塞蒂方法应作为非特发性马蹄内翻足初始治疗的主要方法,因为它可以降低未来进行侵入性关节囊内手术的风险,并在必要进行手术治疗时缩短麻醉和手术时间。三级回顾性病例对照研究。