• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良俯卧位与仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术:来自一家三级教学医院的手术结果。

Modified supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Surgical outcomes from a tertiary teaching hospital.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Department of Medicine, Monash Health, Casey Hospital, Berwick, Australia.

出版信息

Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Jul;57(4):268-73. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.4.268. Epub 2016 Jul 5.

DOI:10.4111/icu.2016.57.4.268
PMID:27437536
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4949697/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The traditional prone positioning of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is associated with various anesthetic and logistic difficulties. We aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of PCNLs performed using our modified supine position with those performed in the standard prone position.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective group of 236 renal units (224 patients) undergoing PCNL were included in this 2 site study: 160 were performed in the modified supine position were compared with 76 undergoing PCNL in the prone position. The outcomes of radiation dose, radiation time, stone free rate, body mass index (BMI), stone size, operative time, length of stay (LOS), in hospital and complications were compared. Chi-square and t-tests were used.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in mean radiation time, radiation dose or stone size between the modified supine and prone groups. The supine group had a higher mean BMI (31 kg/m(2) vs. 28 kg/m(2), p=0.03), shorter mean surgical time (93 minutes vs. 123 minutes, p<0.001), shorter mean LOS (2 days vs. 3 days, p=0.005) and higher stone free rate (70% vs. 50%, p=0.005). There were no differences in septic or bleeding complications but the prone group had a higher rate of overall complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified supine PCNL has significantly lower operative time, shorter LOS and higher stone-free rate compared with prone in our series, while remaining a safe procedure.

摘要

目的

传统的经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)俯卧位与各种麻醉和后勤困难有关。我们旨在比较使用改良仰卧位进行 PCNL 与标准俯卧位进行 PCNL 的手术结果。

材料和方法

这项 2 地点研究纳入了 236 个肾单位(224 例患者)接受 PCNL 的前瞻性组:160 例采用改良仰卧位进行比较,76 例采用俯卧位进行比较。比较辐射剂量、辐射时间、结石清除率、体重指数(BMI)、结石大小、手术时间、住院时间(LOS)、住院时间和并发症。使用卡方检验和 t 检验。

结果

改良仰卧位和俯卧位组的平均辐射时间、辐射剂量或结石大小无显著差异。仰卧位组的平均 BMI 较高(31kg/m2 与 28kg/m2,p=0.03),平均手术时间较短(93 分钟与 123 分钟,p<0.001),平均 LOS 较短(2 天与 3 天,p=0.005)和结石清除率较高(70%与 50%,p=0.005)。在感染或出血并发症方面没有差异,但俯卧组的总并发症发生率较高。

结论

在我们的系列中,改良仰卧位 PCNL 与俯卧位相比,手术时间显著缩短,LOS 更短,结石清除率更高,同时仍然是一种安全的手术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ff7/4949697/205619790f96/icu-57-268-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ff7/4949697/205619790f96/icu-57-268-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ff7/4949697/205619790f96/icu-57-268-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Modified supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Surgical outcomes from a tertiary teaching hospital.改良俯卧位与仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术:来自一家三级教学医院的手术结果。
Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Jul;57(4):268-73. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.4.268. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
2
Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs standard PCNL for management of renal stones in the flank-free modified supine position: single-center experience.无侧卧位改良仰卧位下微创经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石:单中心经验。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Dec;45(6):585-589. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-0966-1. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
3
Complete stone clearance using a modified supine position: initial experience and comparison with prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy.采用改良仰卧位实现完全结石清除:初步经验及与俯卧位经皮肾镜碎石术的比较。
J Endourol. 2013 Jun;27(6):705-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0650. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
4
Supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of patient with complex renal stone diseases.仰卧位与俯卧位经皮肾镜取石术治疗复杂肾结石病。
Urologia. 2024 Aug;91(3):558-562. doi: 10.1177/03915603241229801. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
5
Supine versus prone PCNL in lower calyceal stone: Comparative study in a tertiary care center.仰卧位与俯卧位经皮肾镜取石术治疗下盏结石的比较:三级医疗中心的对照研究。
Urologia. 2021 May;88(2):148-152. doi: 10.1177/0391560320962404. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
6
Supine Versus Prone Position in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Calculi: A Meta-Analysis.仰卧位与俯卧位在经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石中的比较:一项Meta分析。
J Endourol. 2016 Jul;30(7):754-63. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0402. Epub 2016 May 11.
7
Endoscopic guided PCNL in the prone split-leg position versus supine PCNL: a comparative analysis stratified by Guy's stone score.俯卧分腿位内镜引导下经皮肾镜取石术与仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术:一项按盖氏结石评分分层的对比分析
Can J Urol. 2019 Feb;26(1):9664-9674.
8
Complete Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Prone and Supine Positions: A Randomized Controlled Study.俯卧位与仰卧位完全超声引导经皮肾镜取石术:一项随机对照研究
Urology. 2019 Jun;128:31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
9
Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Galdako-Modified Valdivia Position: A High-Volume Single Center Experience.加尔达科改良瓦尔迪维亚体位下的仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术:高容量单中心经验
J Endourol. 2017 Oct;31(10):1001-1006. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0064. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
10
Comparison Between Supine Position Versus Prone Position In Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Single Centered Analysis Of 623 Cases.经皮肾镜取石术中仰卧位与俯卧位的比较:623例单中心分析
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2022 Oct-Dec;34(Suppl 1)(4):S1003-S1007. doi: 10.55519/JAMC-04-S4-11259.

引用本文的文献

1
PERCUTANEOUS APPROACH TO THE KIDNEY: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES OF VARIOUS TECHNIQUES - EXPERIENCE IN OSIJEK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CENTER.经皮肾脏途径:各种技术的异同 - 奥西耶克大学医院中心的经验。
Acta Clin Croat. 2023 Jul;62(Suppl2):148-152. doi: 10.20471/acc.2023.62.s2.22.
2
Oblique supine position versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮肾镜取石术采用斜仰卧位与俯卧位的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023 Jun;18(2):244-253. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2023.126453. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
3
Assessing the Variability of the Twelfth Rib as a Landmark for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Using Computed Tomography.

本文引用的文献

1
Prone versus modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized study.俯卧位与改良侧卧位经皮肾镜取石术:前瞻性随机研究。
Int J Med Sci. 2013 Aug 31;10(11):1518-23. doi: 10.7150/ijms.6305. eCollection 2013.
2
Complete stone clearance using a modified supine position: initial experience and comparison with prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy.采用改良仰卧位实现完全结石清除:初步经验及与俯卧位经皮肾镜碎石术的比较。
J Endourol. 2013 Jun;27(6):705-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0650. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
3
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones in patients with solitary kidney in prone position or in completely supine position: a single-center experience.
使用计算机断层扫描评估第十二肋作为经皮肾镜取石术标志的变异性。
Res Rep Urol. 2023 Aug 3;15:355-363. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S409414. eCollection 2023.
4
Modified Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Elderly: Outcomes and Safety.老年患者改良仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术:疗效与安全性
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 21;12(14):4807. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144807.
5
Factors associated with complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an analysis of 1,066 cases.经皮肾镜碎石取石术后并发症相关因素分析:1066 例病例分析。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 May 15;69(5):e20221089. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20221089. eCollection 2023.
6
Risk Factors for Intra-operative Bleeding in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in an Academic Center: A Retrospective Study.学术中心经皮肾镜取石术中术中出血的危险因素:一项回顾性研究
Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Aug 28;12(4):e126974. doi: 10.5812/aapm-126974. eCollection 2022 Aug.
7
A prospective, randomized comparison of standard prone position versus flank-free modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center initial experience.经皮肾镜取石术中标准俯卧位与无侧卧位改良仰卧位的前瞻性随机对照研究:单中心初步经验
Urol Ann. 2022 Apr-Jun;14(2):172-176. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_31_20. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
8
X-ray-free Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Supine Position Using Alken Metal Telescoping Dilators in a Large Kidney Stone: A Case Report.仰卧位下使用阿尔肯金属伸缩扩张器行无X线超声引导经皮肾镜取石术治疗巨大肾结石:1例报告
Res Rep Urol. 2020 Jul 23;12:287-293. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S259941. eCollection 2020.
9
X-ray-free ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative study with historical control.X 射线自由超声引导与透视引导经皮肾镜取石术:与历史对照的比较研究。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2020 Dec;52(12):2253-2259. doi: 10.1007/s11255-020-02577-w. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
10
Impact of patient position on the outcomes of percutaneous neprolithotomy for complex kidney stones.患者体位对经皮肾镜取石术治疗复杂肾结石疗效的影响。
Int Braz J Urol. 2018 Sep-Oct;44(5):965-971. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0163.
经皮肾镜取石术治疗俯卧位或完全仰卧位孤立肾上盏结石:单中心经验。
Int Braz J Urol. 2012 Nov-Dec;38(6):788-94. doi: 10.1590/1677-553820133806788.
4
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in obese patients: comparison between the prone and total supine position.经皮肾镜碎石术在肥胖患者中的应用:俯卧位与完全仰卧位的比较。
J Endourol. 2012 Nov;26(11):1437-42. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0257. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
5
The CROES percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: the influence of body mass index on outcome.《CROES 经皮肾镜取石术全球研究:体质量指数对结局的影响》。
J Urol. 2012 Jul;188(1):138-44. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.03.013. Epub 2012 May 15.
6
Prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy and postoperative visual loss.经皮肾镜取石术中的俯卧位与术后视力丧失
Urol J. 2011 Summer;8(3):191-6.
7
Supine versus prone position during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a report from the clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study.俯卧位与截石位行经皮肾镜取石术:来自泌尿内镜协会经皮肾镜取石术全球研究临床研究办公室的报告。
J Endourol. 2011 Oct;25(10):1619-25. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0110. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
8
Supine vs prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an anaesthetist's view.
BJU Int. 2011 Aug;108(3):306-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10488.x.
9
Systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for patients in the supine versus prone position.系统评价和荟萃分析:经皮肾镜取石术治疗仰卧位与俯卧位患者的效果。
J Endourol. 2010 Dec;24(12):1941-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0292. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
10
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with spinal deformities.经皮肾镜碎石术治疗脊柱畸形患者。
J Endourol. 2010 Jul;24(7):1081-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0095.