• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用改良仰卧位实现完全结石清除:初步经验及与俯卧位经皮肾镜碎石术的比较。

Complete stone clearance using a modified supine position: initial experience and comparison with prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Casey Hospital, Berwick, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2013 Jun;27(6):705-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0650. Epub 2013 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1089/end.2012.0650
PMID:23363334
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The recently described Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has become increasingly popular. We have made further modifications to this and describe our recent experience compared with our previous prone cases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From April 2011, all patients undergoing PCNL have been placed in the modified supine position. A suction beanbag is used to secure the patient and improve renal access. Data on patient age, comorbidities, stone size, operative time, radiation exposure, complications, stone clearance, and length of stay was collected, analyzed, and compared with data from our previous year's prone surgery.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients in each group underwent 41 PCNLs. The groups were well matched for age, sex, and comorbidity. The supine patients tended to have a higher body mass index. Stones in the supine group were larger (32.6 vs 25.7 mm, P=0.0402), and the operative time was shorter (86.2 vs 116.6 min, P=0.003). Radiation time was similar in the two groups, but the dose was higher in the supine group. Stone clearance rates, length of stay (2.5 days), and complications were similar. Nineteen (46%) patients underwent simultaneous lower urinary tract procedures including 4 (10%) with complete staghorn calculi for which ureterorenoscopy was used to fragment ureteral and upper renal pole stones.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified supine position for PCNL has a number of advantages for the patient and staff compared with the prone position. Despite a more obese study group with larger stones, we have maintained stone clearance rates and significantly reduced operative time with no increase in complications. The technique has been easy to learn and teach. A major advantage has been simultaneous access to the lower urinary tract for ureteroscopy and stent placement, and this has helped with complete stone clearance.

摘要

背景与目的

最近描述的改良仰卧位加迪斯瓦利维亚位(Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position)经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)已越来越受欢迎。我们对该体位进行了进一步改良,并将其与我们之前的俯卧位病例进行了比较。

患者与方法

自 2011 年 4 月以来,所有接受 PCNL 的患者均被置于改良仰卧位。使用吸引豆袋固定患者,以改善肾脏通道。收集并分析了患者年龄、合并症、结石大小、手术时间、辐射暴露、并发症、结石清除率和住院时间的数据,并与前一年的俯卧位手术数据进行了比较。

结果

每组各 36 例患者接受了 41 例 PCNL。两组在年龄、性别和合并症方面匹配良好。仰卧位患者的体重指数更高。仰卧位组的结石更大(32.6 与 25.7mm,P=0.0402),手术时间更短(86.2 与 116.6min,P=0.003)。两组的辐射时间相似,但仰卧位组的辐射剂量更高。结石清除率、住院时间(2.5 天)和并发症相似。19 例(46%)患者同时进行了下尿路手术,其中 4 例(10%)为完全鹿角形结石,采用输尿管镜碎石术处理输尿管和上肾极结石。

结论

与俯卧位相比,改良仰卧位 PCNL 对患者和医务人员有许多优势。尽管研究组患者更肥胖,结石更大,但我们仍保持了结石清除率,并显著缩短了手术时间,同时并发症没有增加。该技术易于学习和教授。一个主要的优势是同时可以进入下尿路进行输尿管镜检查和支架置入,这有助于实现完全结石清除。

相似文献

1
Complete stone clearance using a modified supine position: initial experience and comparison with prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy.采用改良仰卧位实现完全结石清除:初步经验及与俯卧位经皮肾镜碎石术的比较。
J Endourol. 2013 Jun;27(6):705-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0650. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
2
Modified supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Surgical outcomes from a tertiary teaching hospital.改良俯卧位与仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术:来自一家三级教学医院的手术结果。
Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Jul;57(4):268-73. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.4.268. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
3
Modified supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large kidney and ureteral stones: technique and results.改良仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术治疗大肾结石和输尿管结石:技术与结果。
Eur Urol. 2012 Jan;61(1):164-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.04.031. Epub 2011 Apr 29.
4
Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new standard for percutaneous nephrolithotomy?加尔达考改良仰卧瓦尔迪维亚体位下的内镜联合肾内手术:经皮肾镜取石术的新标准?
Eur Urol. 2008 Dec;54(6):1393-403. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.073. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
5
Comparison Between Supine Position Versus Prone Position In Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Single Centered Analysis Of 623 Cases.经皮肾镜取石术中仰卧位与俯卧位的比较:623例单中心分析
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2022 Oct-Dec;34(Suppl 1)(4):S1003-S1007. doi: 10.55519/JAMC-04-S4-11259.
6
Effect of supine vs prone position on outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in staghorn calculi: results from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society Study.斜仰卧位与俯卧位对肾盂鹿角形结石患者经皮肾镜取石术结局的影响:来自腔内泌尿外科学会临床研究办公室的研究结果。
Urology. 2013 Dec;82(6):1240-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.06.068. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
7
Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the Galdakao - Modified Supine Valdivia position: A prospective analysis.加尔达考-改良仰卧瓦尔迪维亚体位经皮肾镜取石术的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性分析。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2016 Jul 4;88(2):93-6. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2016.2.93.
8
Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Galdako-Modified Valdivia Position: A High-Volume Single Center Experience.加尔达科改良瓦尔迪维亚体位下的仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术:高容量单中心经验
J Endourol. 2017 Oct;31(10):1001-1006. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0064. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
9
Supine Versus Prone Position in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Calculi: A Meta-Analysis.仰卧位与俯卧位在经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石中的比较:一项Meta分析。
J Endourol. 2016 Jul;30(7):754-63. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0402. Epub 2016 May 11.
10
Supine pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).仰卧位小儿经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)。
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):78.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.10.012. Epub 2015 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Standard v mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine modified lithotomy position: a randomized pilot study on 10-25 mm stones.仰卧位改良截石位下标准与迷你经皮肾镜取石术治疗10 - 25毫米结石的随机初步研究
ANZ J Surg. 2025 Jan-Feb;95(1-2):124-127. doi: 10.1111/ans.19227. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
2
Supine Versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Single Surgeon's Experience.仰卧位与俯卧位经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL):一位外科医生的经验
Cureus. 2023 Jul 16;15(7):e41944. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41944. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
Modified Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Elderly: Outcomes and Safety.
老年患者改良仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术:疗效与安全性
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 21;12(14):4807. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144807.
4
Comparative Study of Prone Position Variations for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜取石术俯卧位变化的比较研究
Res Rep Urol. 2023 Jun 23;15:233-241. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S415426. eCollection 2023.
5
Supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculi: Our experience.仰卧位与俯卧位经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石:我们的经验。
Curr Urol. 2022 Mar;16(1):25-29. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000076. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
6
Prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: its advantages and our technique for puncture.俯卧位经皮肾镜取石术:其优势及我们的穿刺技术
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Dec;7(6):950-959. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.10.04.
7
Patient positioning during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what is the current best practice?经皮肾镜取石术期间的患者体位:当前的最佳实践是什么?
Res Rep Urol. 2018 Oct 30;10:189-193. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S174396. eCollection 2018.
8
Advances in percutaneous stone surgery.经皮结石手术的进展
Asian J Urol. 2015 Jan;2(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
9
Prone Versus Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: What Is Your Position?俯卧位与仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术:你持什么观点?
Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Apr;18(4):26. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0676-9.
10
Modified supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Surgical outcomes from a tertiary teaching hospital.改良俯卧位与仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术:来自一家三级教学医院的手术结果。
Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Jul;57(4):268-73. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.4.268. Epub 2016 Jul 5.