Suppr超能文献

确定外科手术中患者报告结局的研究议程:运用利益相关者德尔菲调查法

Defining a Research Agenda for Patient-Reported Outcomes in Surgery: Using a Delphi Survey of Stakeholders.

作者信息

Pezold Michael L, Pusic Andrea L, Cohen Wess A, Hollenberg James P, Butt Zeeshan, Flum David R, Temple Larissa K

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York.

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2016 Oct 1;151(10):930-936. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1640.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Identifying timely and important research questions using relevant patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in surgery remains paramount in the current medical climate. The inaugural Patient-Reported Outcomes in Surgery (PROS) Conference brought together stakeholders in PROs research in surgery with the aim of creating a research agenda to help determine future directions and advance cross-disciplinary collaboration.

OBJECTIVE

To create a research agenda to help determine future directions and advance cross-disciplinary collaboration on the use of PROs in surgery.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An iterative web-based interface was used to create a conference-based, modified Delphi survey for registrants at the PROS Conference (January 29-30, 2015), including surgeons, PRO researchers, payers, and other stakeholders. In round 1, research items were generated from qualitative review of responses to open-ended prompts. In round 2, items were ranked using a 5-point Likert scale; attendees were also asked to submit any new items. In round 3, the top 30 items and newly submitted items were redistributed for final ranking using a 3-point Likert scale. The top 20 items by mean rating were selected for the research agenda.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

An expert-generated research agenda on PROs in surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 143 people registered for the conference, 137 provided valid email addresses. There was a wide range of attendees, with the 3 most common groups being plastic surgeons (28 [19.6%]), general surgeons (19 [13.3%]), and researchers (25 [17.5%]). In round 1, participants submitted 459 items, which were reduced through qualitative review to 53 distinct items across 7 themes of PROs research. A research agenda was formulated after 2 successive rounds of ranking. The research agenda identified 3 themes important for future PROs research in surgery: (1) PROs in the decision-making process, (2) integrating PROs into the electronic health record, and (3) measuring quality in surgery with PROs.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The PROS Conference research agenda was created using a modified Delphi survey of stakeholders that will help researchers, surgeons, and funders identify crucial areas of future PROs research in surgery.

摘要

重要性

在当前医疗环境下,利用相关患者报告结局(PRO)及时确定重要的外科研究问题至关重要。首届外科患者报告结局(PROS)会议汇聚了外科PRO研究的利益相关者,旨在制定一项研究议程,以帮助确定未来方向并推动跨学科合作。

目的

制定一项研究议程,以帮助确定未来方向并推动在外科中使用PRO的跨学科合作。

设计、背景和参与者:使用基于网络的迭代界面为PROS会议(2015年1月29 - 30日)的注册者创建了一项基于会议的改良德尔菲调查,参与者包括外科医生、PRO研究人员、付款方和其他利益相关者。在第一轮中,通过对开放式问题回答的定性审查生成研究项目。在第二轮中,使用5点李克特量表对项目进行排名;还要求与会者提交任何新的项目。在第三轮中,将排名前30的项目和新提交的项目重新分发,使用3点李克特量表进行最终排名。根据平均评分选出前20个项目纳入研究议程。

主要结局和衡量指标

一个由专家生成的外科PRO研究议程。

结果

在143名会议注册者中,137人提供了有效的电子邮件地址。与会者群体广泛,最常见的3个群体是整形外科医生(28人[19.6%])、普通外科医生(19人[13.3%])和研究人员(25人[17.5%])。在第一轮中,参与者提交了459个项目,通过定性审查减少到PRO研究7个主题下的53个不同项目。经过两轮连续排名后制定了研究议程。该研究议程确定了外科未来PRO研究的3个重要主题:(1)决策过程中的PRO,(2)将PRO整合到电子健康记录中,(3)用PRO衡量外科手术质量。

结论和意义

PROS会议研究议程是通过对利益相关者进行改良德尔菲调查创建的,这将有助于研究人员、外科医生和资助者确定外科未来PRO研究的关键领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09c4/5216456/e3626c0d83e0/nihms-834612-f0001.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
State-of-the-art: outcome assessment in adult spinal deformity.最新进展:成人脊柱畸形的疗效评估。
Spine Deform. 2021 Jan;9(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00220-3. Epub 2020 Oct 9.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验