Aichinger Philipp, Hagmüller Martin, Roesner Imme, Bigenzahn Wolfgang, Schneider-Stickler Berit, Schoentgen Jean
Division of Phoniatrics-Logopedics, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2016;68(1):22-8. doi: 10.1159/000447589. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
The aims of this study are to investigate the effects of diplophonia on jitter and shimmer and to identify measurement limitations with regard to material selection and clinical interpretation.
Four hundred and ninety-eight audio samples of sustained phonations were analyzed. The audio samples were assessed for the grade of hoarseness and the presence of diplophonia. Jitter and shimmer were reported with regard to perceptual ratings. We investigated cycle marker positions exemplarily and qualitatively to understand their implications for perturbation measurements.
Medians of jitter and shimmer were higher for diplophonic voices than for nondiplophonic voices with equal grades of hoarseness. The variance of jitter for moderately dysphonic voices was larger than the variance observed in a corpus from which diplophonic samples had been discarded. The positions of cycle markers in diplophonic voices did not match the positions of the pulses, indicating that the validity of jitter and shimmer values for these voices were questionable.
Diplophonia biases the reporting of dysphonia severity via perturbation measures, and their validity is questionable for these voices. In addition, diplophonia is an influential source of variance in jitter measurements. Thus, diplophonic fragments of voice samples should be excluded prior to perturbation analysis.
本研究旨在探讨双声对抖动和闪烁的影响,并确定在材料选择和临床解释方面的测量局限性。
对498个持续发声的音频样本进行分析。评估音频样本的嘶哑程度和双声的存在情况。报告了关于感知评分的抖动和闪烁情况。我们示例性地和定性地研究了周期标记位置,以了解它们对微扰测量的影响。
在嘶哑程度相同的情况下,双声嗓音的抖动和闪烁中位数高于非双声嗓音。中度发声障碍嗓音的抖动方差大于丢弃双声样本的语料库中观察到的方差。双声嗓音中周期标记的位置与脉冲位置不匹配,表明这些嗓音的抖动和闪烁值的有效性值得怀疑。
双声通过微扰测量使发声障碍严重程度的报告产生偏差,并且其对这些嗓音的有效性值得怀疑。此外,双声是抖动测量中一个有影响的方差来源。因此,在进行微扰分析之前,应排除语音样本中的双声片段。