• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

AN UNCERTAIN FEDERALISM: THE STATES AND THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT.

作者信息

Plein L Christopher

出版信息

J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2014 Winter;37(3):350-77.

PMID:27439263
Abstract

This article provides an initial assessment of the Affordable Care Act's recent implementation experience in the states. Drawing on state-level and regional analyses that have been coordinated by the ACA Implementation Network--a cooperative effort involving researchers in 35 states--this article highlights the uncertain policy environment associated with the politics and complexities of the ACA. Understanding the ACA implementation experience requires an appreciation for political context, but must also take into account underlying demographic, market, and state administrative capacity issues in the states. There are indications that the ACA implementation experience is moving from a highly charged partisan nature to a more accommodating posture long associated with intergovernmental relations between the federal and state government in health and human services administration. In short, the key questions going forward will turn on how, not whether, the ACA is implemented.

摘要

相似文献

1
AN UNCERTAIN FEDERALISM: THE STATES AND THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT.
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2014 Winter;37(3):350-77.
2
What Is Federalism in Healthcare For?医疗保健中的联邦制是为了什么?
Stanford Law Rev. 2018 Jun;70(6):1689-803.
3
Federalism And The ACA: Lessons For The 2020 Health Policy Debate.联邦制与《平价医疗法案》:2020年卫生政策辩论的经验教训
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Mar;39(3):487-493. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01366.
4
Implementing health care reform in the United States: intergovernmental politics and the dilemmas of institutional design.在美国实施医疗保健改革:政府间政治与制度设计的困境
Health Policy. 2014 May;116(1):51-60. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.01.010. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
5
MAKING FEDERALISM WORK? THE POLITICS OF INTERGOVERNMENTAL COLLABORATION AND THE PPACA.联邦制能否有效运行?政府间合作的政治与《患者保护与平价医疗法案》
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2015 Spring;37(4):412-61.
6
Republican States Bolstered Their Health Insurance Rate Review Programs Using Incentives From the Affordable Care Act.共和党州利用《平价医疗法案》的激励措施加强了他们的健康保险费率审查计划。
Inquiry. 2015 Sep 21;52. doi: 10.1177/0046958015604164. Print 2015.
7
Inching toward incrementalism: federalism, devolution, and health policy in the United States and the United Kingdom.逐步推进:美国和英国的联邦主义、权力下放与卫生政策。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2011 Feb;36(1):33-57. doi: 10.1215/03616878-1191099.
8
You Can't Make Me Do It, but I Could Be Persuaded: A Federalism Perspective on the Affordable Care Act.你无法强迫我这么做,但我可能会被说服:从联邦制视角看《平价医疗法案》
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015 Apr;40(2):281-323. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2882219. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
9
The Affordable Care Act in the States: Fragmented Politics, Unstable Policy.美国的《平价医疗法案》:碎片化的政治,不稳定的政策。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2020 Aug 1;45(4):647-660. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8255565.
10
Partisan Politics or Public-Health Need? An empirical analysis of state choice during initial implementation of the Affordable Care Act.党派政治还是公共卫生需求?《平价医疗法案》初期实施阶段各州选择的实证分析。
Politics Life Sci. 2015 Fall;34(2):44-51. doi: 10.1017/pls.2015.15.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes to ACA Individual Insurance Markets After States Leave Healthcare.gov 2016-2023.2016 - 2023年各州退出医保市场后《平价医疗法案》个人保险市场的变化。
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251371893. doi: 10.1177/00469580251371893. Epub 2025 Sep 10.