• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺MRI上包膜接触长度作为包膜外侵犯预测指标:哪种序列最为理想?

Length of capsular contact on prostate MRI as a predictor of extracapsular extension: which is the most optimal sequence?

作者信息

Woo Sungmin, Kim Sang Youn, Cho Jeong Yeon, Kim Seung Hyup

机构信息

1 Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

2 Institute of Radiation Medicine and Kidney Research Institute, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Acta Radiol. 2017 Apr;58(4):489-497. doi: 10.1177/0284185116658684. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1177/0284185116658684
PMID:27439401
Abstract

Background Length of capsular contact (LCC) is a promising biomarker for predicting extracapsular extension (ECE), but the most optimal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequence for measuring LCC is yet to be determined. Purpose To evaluate LCC using different MRI sequences for determining ECE in prostate cancer. Material and Methods A total of 185 patients underwent prostate MRI followed by radical prostatectomy. LCC was measured separately on T2-weighted (T2W) images, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. LCCs (LCC, LCC, LCC, and LCC [greatest value of 3 LCCs]) were compared between sequences using Wilcoxon signed rank test and was tested for determining ECE using the Mann-Whitney U test, ROC curve analysis, and logistic regression analysis. Results There were no significant differences among LCCs ( P = 0.333-0.837). All LCCs were significantly greater in patients with ECE ( P < 0.001). The optimal threshold value for predicting ECE was >14, >13, >12, and >14 mm for LCC, LCC, LCC, and LCC, respectively. LCC yielded the highest area under the curve (0.895) which was significantly greater than that by LCC (0.858, P = 0.030). Otherwise, there were no significant difference between LCCs ( P = 0.052-0.985). At univariate analysis, age, clinical stage, PSA, Gleason score, and all LCCs were significantly associated with ECE ( P < 0.001-0.040). At multivariate analysis, GS ( P ≤ 0.008) and all LCCs ( P < 0.001) were independently predictive factors. Conclusion LCC measured on any sequence was significantly different in patients with and without ECE and was independently associated with the presence of ECE. Although LCC showed the greatest ability to predict ECE, there was relatively equivalent performance among different MRI sequences.

摘要

背景 包膜接触长度(LCC)是预测包膜外侵犯(ECE)的一个有前景的生物标志物,但用于测量LCC的最佳磁共振成像(MRI)序列尚未确定。目的 使用不同的MRI序列评估LCC以确定前列腺癌中的ECE。材料与方法 共有185例患者接受了前列腺MRI检查,随后进行了根治性前列腺切除术。分别在T2加权(T2W)图像、表观扩散系数(ADC)图和动态对比增强(DCE)MRI上测量LCC。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较各序列之间的LCC(LCC、LCC、LCC和LCC[3个LCC中的最大值]),并使用Mann-Whitney U检验、ROC曲线分析和逻辑回归分析来检验其对ECE的诊断价值。结果 LCC之间无显著差异(P = 0.333 - 0.837)。所有LCC在有ECE的患者中均显著更大(P < 0.001)。预测ECE的最佳阈值分别为LCC > 14、LCC > 13、LCC > 12和LCC > 14 mm。LCC的曲线下面积最大(0.895),显著大于LCC的曲线下面积(0.858,P = 0.030)。否则,LCC之间无显著差异(P = 0.052 - 0.985)。单因素分析时,年龄、临床分期、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、Gleason评分和所有LCC均与ECE显著相关(P < 0.001 - 0.040)。多因素分析时,Gleason评分(P ≤ 0.008)和所有LCC(P < 0.001)是独立的预测因素。结论 在有或无ECE的患者中,任何序列测量的LCC均有显著差异,且与ECE的存在独立相关。虽然LCC显示出预测ECE的最大能力,但不同MRI序列之间的性能相对相当。

相似文献

1
Length of capsular contact on prostate MRI as a predictor of extracapsular extension: which is the most optimal sequence?前列腺MRI上包膜接触长度作为包膜外侵犯预测指标:哪种序列最为理想?
Acta Radiol. 2017 Apr;58(4):489-497. doi: 10.1177/0284185116658684. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
2
Evaluation of the most optimal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging sequence for determining pathological length of capsular contact.评估确定囊袋接触病理性长度的最佳多参数磁共振成像序列。
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Mar;112:192-199. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
3
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of extracapsular invasion and other staging parameters in patients with prostate cancer candidates for radical prostatectomy.多参数磁共振成像用于评估拟行根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌患者的包膜外侵犯及其他分期参数。
Actas Urol Esp. 2014 Jun;38(5):290-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2013.11.003. Epub 2014 Jan 1.
4
Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.多参数磁共振成像在前列腺癌检测与分期中的应用
Dan Med J. 2017 Feb;64(2).
5
Extracapsular extension in prostate cancer: added value of diffusion-weighted MRI in patients with equivocal findings on T2-weighted imaging.前列腺癌的包膜外侵犯:T2加权成像表现不明确的患者中扩散加权磁共振成像的附加价值
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Feb;204(2):W168-75. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12939.
6
Is There a Role for Functional MRI for the Assessment of Extracapsular Extension in Prostate Cancer?功能磁共振成像在评估前列腺癌包膜外侵犯方面有作用吗?
Anticancer Res. 2018 Jan;38(1):427-432. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12240.
7
Diffusion-weighted MRI as a predictor of extracapsular extension in prostate cancer.弥散加权 MRI 预测前列腺癌的囊外侵犯。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Mar;202(3):W270-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11333.
8
Defining the incremental value of 3D T2-weighted imaging in the assessment of prostate cancer extracapsular extension.定义 3D T2 加权成像在评估前列腺癌包膜外侵犯中的附加价值。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Oct;29(10):5488-5497. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06070-6. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
9
[Can preoperative prostate MRI before radical prostatectomy predict extracapsular extension and the side of the index lesion?].[根治性前列腺切除术前行前列腺MRI能否预测包膜外侵犯及主要病灶的位置?]
Prog Urol. 2016 Apr;26(5):281-6. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
10
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging localizes established extracapsular extension of prostate cancer.多参数磁共振成像可定位已确定的前列腺癌包膜外扩展。
Urol Oncol. 2015 Mar;33(3):109.e15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.11.007. Epub 2014 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer: pragmatic integration of MRI and PSMA-PET/CT.评估前列腺癌的前列腺外扩展:MRI与PSMA-PET/CT的实用整合
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Apr 19. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-04948-2.
2
Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: A review of current technology.前列腺癌的定量磁共振成像:当前技术综述
World J Radiol. 2024 Oct 28;16(10):497-511. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v16.i10.497.
3
A pictorial essay of PI-RADS pearls and pitfalls: toward less ambiguity and better practice.
PI-RADS要点与陷阱的图文并茂文章:力求减少模糊性并优化实践。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Sep;49(9):3190-3205. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04273-0. Epub 2024 May 5.
4
Imaging features of the PI-RADS for predicting extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)预测前列腺癌前列腺外侵犯的影像特征:系统评价与荟萃分析
Insights Imaging. 2023 May 8;14(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01422-9.
5
The role of MRI in prostate cancer: current and future directions.MRI 在前列腺癌中的作用:现状与未来方向。
MAGMA. 2022 Aug;35(4):503-521. doi: 10.1007/s10334-022-01006-6. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
6
Current Opinion on the Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staging Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review.关于磁共振成像在前列腺癌分期中应用的当前观点:一项叙述性综述。
Cancer Manag Res. 2022 Mar 1;14:937-951. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S283299. eCollection 2022.
7
The Quantitative Assessment of Using Multiparametric MRI for Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy: A .多参数磁共振成像用于预测接受根治性前列腺切除术患者前列腺外侵犯的定量评估:一项……
Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 22;11:771864. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.771864. eCollection 2021.
8
The Diagnostic Performance of the Length of Tumor Capsular Contact on MRI for Detecting Prostate Cancer Extraprostatic Extension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.MRI 上肿瘤包膜接触长度诊断前列腺癌前列腺外侵犯的效能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Korean J Radiol. 2020 Jun;21(6):684-694. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0842.
9
Contribution of Radiology to Staging of Prostate Cancer.放射学在前列腺癌分期中的作用。
Semin Nucl Med. 2019 Jul;49(4):294-301. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
10
Apparent diffusion coefficient in extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.前列腺癌前列腺外侵犯的表观扩散系数:一项系统评价与诊断性荟萃分析
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Apr 11;11:3125-3137. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S191738. eCollection 2019.