Zijlstra-Shaw S, Roberts T, Robinson P G
Academic Unit of Primary Dental Care, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Leeds Institute of Medical Education, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Eur J Dent Educ. 2017 Nov;21(4):e89-e100. doi: 10.1111/eje.12226. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
Dental professionalism is an essential requirement to practice dentistry that covers both abilities and personal qualities. Therefore, a programme of assessment that promotes personal and professional development throughout the undergraduate dental education course is needed. This study aimed to develop and validate a system to assess dental students' professionalism based on a previously developed conceptual framework.
Using the framework, an assessment programme was designed to encourage students to reflect on and explain their observed behaviours with appropriate feedback. The programme was panel-tested and then administered to a cohort of senior dental students. Internal reliability criterion validity and construct validity were evaluated quantitatively, whilst the usefulness of the programme was evaluated qualitatively.
Mean of student, staff and agreed grades was similar, and there were no floor or ceiling effects. All item-total correlations were >0.6 and Cronbach's alpha = 0.95 indicating acceptable internal reliability. All items correlated significantly with global ratings indicating good criterion validity. All hypothesized correlations were significant, and grades were not related to age or gender. Qualitative data produced three themes: assessment process, educational value and suggestions for improvement.
The assessment programme has good internal reliability and validity and suggests that basing an assessment system around the explicit theoretical model is a valuable educational tool.
牙科专业素养是从事牙科工作的一项基本要求,涵盖能力和个人品质。因此,需要一个在本科牙科教育课程中促进个人和专业发展的评估方案。本研究旨在基于先前开发的概念框架,开发并验证一个评估牙科学生专业素养的系统。
利用该框架设计了一个评估方案,以鼓励学生通过适当的反馈来反思和解释他们观察到的行为。该方案经过小组测试,然后应用于一群高年级牙科学生。对内部信度、标准效度和结构效度进行了定量评估,同时对该方案的实用性进行了定性评估。
学生、教师和商定成绩的平均值相似,且不存在地板效应或天花板效应。所有项目与总分的相关性均>0.6,克朗巴哈系数α=0.95,表明内部信度可接受。所有项目与总体评分均显著相关,表明标准效度良好。所有假设的相关性均显著,且成绩与年龄或性别无关。定性数据产生了三个主题:评估过程、教育价值和改进建议。
该评估方案具有良好的内部信度和效度,表明围绕明确的理论模型构建评估系统是一种有价值的教育工具。