• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Degeneration with the VariLift-L Interbody Fusion System: Retrospective Review of 470 Cases.使用VariLift-L椎间融合系统治疗有症状的腰椎间盘退变:470例病例的回顾性研究
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 May 3;10:15. doi: 10.14444/3015. eCollection 2016.
2
One and two level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using an expandable, stand-alone, interbody fusion device: a VariLift case series.使用可扩张独立式椎间融合器的单节段和双节段腰椎后路椎间融合术(PLIF):VariLift病例系列
J Spine Surg. 2017 Mar;3(1):9-15. doi: 10.21037/jss.2017.02.05.
3
Stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration following previous lumbar fusion.单纯侧方腰椎间融合术治疗腰椎融合术后症状性邻近节段退变。
Spine J. 2018 Nov;18(11):2025-2032. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
4
The VariLift(®) Interbody Fusion System: expandable, standalone interbody fusion.VariLift(®)椎间融合系统:可扩展的独立椎间融合系统。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2015 May 26;8:219-30. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S84715. eCollection 2015.
5
Bilateral implantation of low-profile interbody fusion cages: subsidence, lordosis, and fusion analysis.双侧植入低轮廓椎间融合器:下沉、前凸及融合分析。
Spine J. 2003 Sep-Oct;3(5):377-87. doi: 10.1016/s1529-9430(03)00145-1.
6
Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-alone lateral interbody fusion.单纯侧方椎间融合术后 cage 沉降的影像学和临床评估。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Jul;19(1):110-8. doi: 10.3171/2013.4.SPINE12319. Epub 2013 May 10.
7
Stand-Alone Anterolateral Interbody Fusion Versus Extended Posterior Fusion for Symptomatic Adjacent-Segment Degeneration: A Retrospective Study of 2 Years' Follow-up.孤立性前外侧椎间融合术与扩展性后路融合术治疗症状性相邻节段退变:一项为期2年随访的回顾性研究
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jul;115:e748-e755. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.165. Epub 2018 May 3.
8
Two-year Clinical and Radiographic Results with a Multidimensional, Expandable Interbody Implant in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery.微创腰椎手术中使用多维可扩张椎间融合器的两年临床及影像学结果
Cureus. 2020 Feb 21;12(2):e7070. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7070.
9
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.使用可扩张与静态椎间融合器的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:矢状节段和骨盆参数的影像学评估
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E10. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17197.
10
Evaluation of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Performed Using a Stand-Alone, Integrated Fusion Cage.使用独立一体式融合器进行腰椎前路椎间融合术的评估。
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Feb;17(1):1-5. doi: 10.14444/8354. Epub 2022 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
A single straight expandable cage via a hybrid posterior-transforaminal approach with rhBMP-2 or allograft provides high fusion rates with low risk of subsidence.通过后路经椎间孔混合入路使用重组人骨形态发生蛋白-2(rhBMP-2)或同种异体骨移植的单个直形可扩张椎间融合器可实现高融合率且下沉风险低。
J Spine Surg. 2025 Mar 24;11(1):1-14. doi: 10.21037/jss-24-82. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
2
Advancements in Custom 3D-Printed Titanium Interbody Spinal Fusion Cages and Their Relevance in Personalized Spine Care.定制3D打印钛椎间融合器的进展及其在个性化脊柱护理中的意义。
J Pers Med. 2024 Jul 30;14(8):809. doi: 10.3390/jpm14080809.
3
Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Surgery Center and Traditional Hospital Settings, Part 2: Assessment of Surgical Safety in Medicare Beneficiaries.门诊手术中心与传统医院环境下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的比较,第2部分:医疗保险受益人的手术安全性评估
J Pers Med. 2023 Mar 22;13(3):566. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030566.
4
Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Surgery Center and Traditional Hospital Settings, Part 1: Multi-Center Assessment of Surgical Safety.门诊手术中心与传统医院环境下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的比较,第1部分:手术安全性的多中心评估。
J Pers Med. 2023 Feb 10;13(2):311. doi: 10.3390/jpm13020311.
5
A Differential Clinical Benefit Examination of Full Lumbar Endoscopy vs Interspinous Process Spacers in the Treatment of Spinal Stenosis: An Effect Size Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.全腰椎内镜与棘突间撑开器治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效差异比较:临床结局的效应量Meta分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Feb;16(1):102-123. doi: 10.14444/8200. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
6
Stand-Alone Posterior Expandable Cage Technique for Adjacent Segment Degeneration with Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: A Retrospective Case Series.独立后路可扩张椎间融合器技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症相邻节段退变:一项回顾性病例系列研究
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Mar 4;57(3):237. doi: 10.3390/medicina57030237.
7
Thirty-Day Outcomes From Standalone Minimally Invasive Surgery-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Patients in an Ambulatory Surgery Center vs. Hospital Setting.门诊手术中心与医院环境下独立微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术患者的30天预后
Cureus. 2020 Sep 2;12(9):e10197. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10197.
8
Can posterior stand-alone expandable cages safely restore lumbar lordosis? A minimum 5-year follow-up study.后路非融合可扩张 cage 能否安全恢复腰椎前凸?一项至少 5 年随访研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Sep 29;15(1):442. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01866-5.
9
Two-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Expandable Interbody Spacers Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Study.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后可扩张椎间融合器的两年临床及影像学结果:一项前瞻性研究
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Aug;14(4):518-526. doi: 10.14444/7068. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
10
Safety and Efficacy of the VariLift-C® Cervical Standalone Interbody Fusion Device with Emphasis on Multiple-level and Prior Fusion Cases.VariLift-C® 颈椎独立椎间融合器的安全性和有效性,重点关注多节段和既往融合病例
Cureus. 2019 Oct 10;11(10):e5885. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5885.

本文引用的文献

1
The VariLift(®) Interbody Fusion System: expandable, standalone interbody fusion.VariLift(®)椎间融合系统:可扩展的独立椎间融合系统。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2015 May 26;8:219-30. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S84715. eCollection 2015.
2
Restoration of lumbopelvic sagittal alignment and its maintenance following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): comparison between straight type versus curvilinear type cage.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)后腰椎骨盆矢状位对线的恢复及其维持:直型与曲线型椎间融合器的比较
Eur Spine J. 2015 Nov;24(11):2588-96. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3899-9. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
3
Current strategies for the restoration of adequate lordosis during lumbar fusion.腰椎融合术中恢复足够前凸的当前策略。
World J Orthop. 2015 Jan 18;6(1):117-26. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i1.117.
4
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with stand-alone Trabecular Metal cages for repeatedly recurrent lumbar disc herniation and back pain.单纯使用 Trabecular Metal 椎间融合笼行后路腰椎间融合术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症和腰痛
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jun;20(6):617-22. doi: 10.3171/2014.2.SPINE13548. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
5
Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-alone lateral interbody fusion.单纯侧方椎间融合术后 cage 沉降的影像学和临床评估。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Jul;19(1):110-8. doi: 10.3171/2013.4.SPINE12319. Epub 2013 May 10.
6
Comparison of superior-level facet joint violations during open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement.开放与经皮椎弓根螺钉置入时上位关节突关节面侵犯的比较。
Neurosurgery. 2012 Nov;71(5):962-70. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826a88c8.
7
Are stand-alone cages sufficient for anterior lumbar interbody fusion?单纯使用 Cage 进行前路腰椎间融合术是否足够?
Orthop Surg. 2012 Feb;4(1):11-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7861.2011.00164.x.
8
Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.测定融合延伸治疗相邻节段病变后疼痛、残疾和生活质量的最小临床重要差异。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Jan;16(1):61-7. doi: 10.3171/2011.8.SPINE1194. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
9
Facet violation with the placement of percutaneous pedicle screws.经皮椎弓根螺钉置钉时的面弓违例。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 15;36(26):E1749-52. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318221a800.
10
Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion.腰椎融合术后邻近节段病的危险因素。
Eur Spine J. 2009 Nov;18(11):1637-43. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1060-3. Epub 2009 Jun 16.

使用VariLift-L椎间融合系统治疗有症状的腰椎间盘退变:470例病例的回顾性研究

Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Degeneration with the VariLift-L Interbody Fusion System: Retrospective Review of 470 Cases.

作者信息

Neely Warren F, Fichtel Frank, Del Monaco Diana Cardenas, Block Jon E

机构信息

Kingman, Neely, & Fichtel MDs, San Antonio, TX.

Texas Neurosciences Institute, San Antonio, TX.

出版信息

Int J Spine Surg. 2016 May 3;10:15. doi: 10.14444/3015. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.14444/3015
PMID:27441173
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4943165/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many first generation stand-alone fusion cages required endplate decortication and surgical impaction during the procedure resulting in segmental subsidence, implant migration and loss of lordosis postoperatively. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate radiographically, in a large series of patients, whether engineering and design modifications incorporated in a specific stand-alone, expandable interbody fusion device (VariLift(®)-L) adequately addressed previously recognized deficiencies of stand-alone interbody cages.

METHODS

In this retrospective chart review of 470 patients (642 treated levels), we evaluated radiographic evidence of fusion, subsidence and migration following a one- or two-level PLIF procedure utilizing this stand-alone expandable interbody fusion device. A secondary objective was to corroborate the low morbidity and symptomatic improvements achieved with previous interbody cage devices used to treat symptomatic disc degeneration.

RESULTS

The average postoperative followup was 3.9 ± 1.8 years and a solid fusion rate of 94% was achieved among patients with ≥ 9 months of radiographic followup. Subsidence > 3 mm was noted at 10 levels with no cases of device migration. Composite back pain severity scores improved from 8.5 ± 1.5 preoperatively to 0.8 ± 1.5 at final followup (p<0.001) and 94% of patients met or exceeded the minimal clinical important difference of 3.8 points. Eighteen patients required reoperation following the index procedure; 16 of these patients were treated for adjacent segment disease.

CONCLUSIONS LOE

The VariLift-L device has excellent clinical and technical performance characteristics, providing adequate stabilization of the anterior column without the need for supplemental posterior instrumentation. Level of Evidence IV. IRB Approval: Expedited Federal Register Categories 5& 7: Methodist IRB 3/30/2011; Informed Consent statement: retrospective data collection, patients signed consent forms allowing for data to be used for research.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This stand-alone expandable fusion device produced high fusion rates, a low incidence of reoperation and effective symptom relief in a "real world" setting among a large group of patients with refractory symptomatic disc degeneration.

摘要

背景

许多第一代独立融合器在手术过程中需要进行终板去皮质和手术挤压,导致术后节段性沉降、植入物移位和脊柱前凸丧失。本研究的主要目的是通过对大量患者进行影像学评估,确定一种特定的独立可扩张椎间融合器(VariLift(®)-L)在工程设计上的改进是否充分解决了先前公认的独立椎间融合器的不足之处。

方法

在这项对470例患者(642个治疗节段)的回顾性病历审查中,我们评估了使用这种独立可扩张椎间融合器进行单节段或双节段后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)后融合、沉降和移位的影像学证据。第二个目的是证实先前用于治疗症状性椎间盘退变的椎间融合器所取得的低发病率和症状改善情况。

结果

术后平均随访时间为3.9±1.8年,在影像学随访时间≥9个月的患者中,坚固融合率达到94%。在10个节段观察到沉降>3mm,无器械移位病例。复合性背痛严重程度评分从术前的8.5±1.5改善至末次随访时的0.8±1.5(p<0.001),94%的患者达到或超过了3.8分的最小临床重要差异。18例患者在初次手术后需要再次手术;其中16例患者接受了相邻节段疾病的治疗。

结论证据等级

VariLift-L装置具有出色的临床和技术性能特征,无需补充后路器械即可为前柱提供足够的稳定性。证据等级IV。机构审查委员会批准:快速联邦登记类别5和7:卫理公会机构审查委员会2011年3月30日;知情同意声明:回顾性数据收集,患者签署同意书,允许将数据用于研究。

临床相关性

在一大群难治性症状性椎间盘退变患者的“真实世界”环境中,这种独立可扩张融合装置产生了高融合率、低再手术率并有效缓解了症状。