a Alcohol Research Group , Public Health Institute , Emeryville , California , USA.
b Brandeis University , Waltham , Massachusetts , USA.
Subst Abus. 2017 Jul-Sep;38(3):309-316. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2016.1213780. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
Having a stable and safe place to live is integral to recovery from addiction. Recovery residences represent an important component in the substance use continuum of care, but research on them has been limited to certain types of recovery residences and has yet to examine quality of life among those who live in them.
This study presents data on the characteristics of residents (N = 104) living in a stratified random sample of recovery homes in Philadelphia (N = 13) as well as data from a random subsample of residents (N = 27) who participated in 3-month follow-up interviews.
Residents in these homes reported deficits in a variety of aspects of their lives critical to helping them initiate and sustain their recovery; many (20%) reported living in a shelter or on the streets prior to moving in, 37% had less than a high school education, and only 26% reported currently working for pay. Although the majority of residents rated their quality of life as good or very good (74%), average physical health, social relationship, and environment domain scores measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-Bref were generally lower than scores found among community samples. At follow-up, all residents were housed and rates of substance use (7%), criminal justice involvement (0%), and employment (44%) in the past 30 days were encouraging. Quality of life domain scores were unchanged, with the exception of psychological health, which decreased.
These findings highlight the complex needs of residents living in Philadelphia recovery homes and the role that these homes play in maintaining residents in their early recovery. Studies with larger samples of residents followed up over longer periods of time are needed to assess the role that these homes may play in promoting long-term recovery and improving the well-being of the vulnerable population of individuals who live in them.
拥有一个稳定和安全的住所是康复的重要组成部分。康复住所代表了物质使用连续护理中的一个重要组成部分,但对它们的研究仅限于某些类型的康复住所,尚未研究居住在其中的人的生活质量。
本研究介绍了居住在费城分层随机抽样的康复家庭中的居民(N=104)的特征数据(N=13),以及参与 3 个月随访访谈的居民随机子样本(N=27)的数据。
这些家庭的居民报告说,他们的生活在许多方面存在缺陷,这些缺陷对帮助他们开始和维持康复至关重要;许多人(20%)在搬进来之前住在收容所或街头,37%的人受教育程度低于高中,只有 26%的人报告目前有薪工作。尽管大多数居民将他们的生活质量评为良好或非常好(74%),但通过世界卫生组织生活质量问卷(WHOQOL-Bref)测量的平均生理健康、社会关系和环境领域得分通常低于社区样本的得分。在随访时,所有居民都有住所,过去 30 天内的物质使用(7%)、刑事司法参与(0%)和就业(44%)率令人鼓舞。生活质量领域的得分没有变化,除了心理健康,它有所下降。
这些发现突出了居住在费城康复家庭中的居民的复杂需求,以及这些家庭在维持居民早期康复方面的作用。需要对更多的居民进行研究,并对他们进行更长时间的随访,以评估这些家庭在促进长期康复和改善居住在其中的弱势群体的福祉方面可能发挥的作用。