Klappenbach Hugo, Jacó-Vilela Ana Maria
Faculty of Psychology, National University of San Luis.
Department of Social and Institutional Psychology, University of the State of Rio de Janeiro.
Hist Psychol. 2016 Aug;19(3):229-247. doi: 10.1037/hop0000030.
This article analyzes the development of the history of psychology in Argentina and Brazil, beginning with the emergence of the history of psychology at the beginning of the 20th century. The paper analyzes that such old historical reconstructions were written by the same authors or institutions that were introducing Psychology in the two countries. That is, the older historical productions in the field of psychology were Whig biased. An analysis of the last 30 years of history of psychology is also provided. The article describes institutional developments, including archives, journals, scientific meetings, and teaching of history of psychology in academic settings. Main groups devoted to history of psychology, both in Argentina and Brazil are described. Finally, it offers some thoughts on the future of history of psychology in the 2 countries. A comparative study between Argentina and Brazil allows to understand strengths and weakness related to institutionalization of History of Psychology. (PsycINFO Database Record
本文分析了阿根廷和巴西心理学史的发展，始于20世纪初心理学史的出现。论文分析指出，此类早期历史重构是由在这两个国家引入心理学的同一批作者或机构撰写的。也就是说，心理学领域早期的历史著作存在辉格党偏见。本文还提供了对心理学史过去30年的分析。文章描述了机构发展情况，包括档案、期刊、科学会议以及学术环境中心理学史的教学。介绍了阿根廷和巴西致力于心理学史研究的主要团体。最后，文章对这两个国家心理学史的未来发展提出了一些思考。阿根廷和巴西之间的比较研究有助于了解与心理学史制度化相关的优势和劣势。（PsycINFO数据库记录）
