Suppr超能文献

采用两种施测方法的老年人听力障碍量表的重测信度。

Test-retest reliability of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly using two administration approaches.

作者信息

Newman C W, Weinstein B E

机构信息

Division of Audiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 1989 Jun;10(3):190-1. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198906000-00009.

Abstract

Previous investigation with the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly demonstrated high test-retest reliability for face to face/face to face and paper-pencil/paper-pencil administration techniques. From a practical standpoint, a face to face administration followed by a paper-pencil readministration may be a preferable method. The present study evaluated the latter administration approach in a sample of hearing-impaired elderly men. The high test-retest reliability correlations which emerged suggest that the face to face/paper-pencil measurement technique can be adopted for quantifying changes in self-perceived hearing handicap following audiologic intervention especially when clients are unable to return for hearing aid follow-up.

摘要

先前使用老年人听力障碍量表进行的调查表明,面对面/面对面和纸笔/纸笔施测技术具有很高的重测信度。从实际角度来看,先进行面对面施测,然后再进行纸笔重测可能是一种更好的方法。本研究在一组听力受损的老年男性样本中评估了后一种施测方法。所出现的高重测信度相关性表明,面对面/纸笔测量技术可用于量化听力干预后自我感知听力障碍的变化,特别是当患者无法返回进行助听器随访时。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验