现实主义评价的报告指南旨在提高清晰度和透明度。

Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency.

作者信息

Welch Vivian A, Tricco Andrea C

机构信息

Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2016 Jul 21;14(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0658-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12916-016-0658-7

PMID:27443561

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4957299/

Abstract

An increasing number of realist evaluations are being conducted from a wide range of disciplinary perspectives and with diverse, fit-for-purpose methods. This commentary discusses the recent BMC Medicine publication of RAMESES II reporting guidelines for realist evaluations. Knowledge users such as program implementers and decision-makers will benefit from the increased transparency of reporting and interpretation in light of the totality of evidence encouraged by this guidance. It is hoped that these reporting guidelines will eventually lead to improved knowledge synthesis and contribute to the cumulative science regarding realist evaluation.Please see related article: https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-016-0643-1.

摘要

越来越多的现实主义评价正从广泛的学科视角，运用多样且适用的方法展开。本评论探讨了近期发表于《BMC医学》的关于现实主义评价的RAMESES II报告指南。诸如项目实施者和决策者等知识使用者，将受益于该指南所鼓励的基于全部证据的报告与解读透明度的提高。希望这些报告指南最终能促进知识综合的改进，并为现实主义评价的累积性科学做出贡献。请参阅相关文章：https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-016-0643-1 。