健康研究报告规范开发者指南。
Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines.
机构信息
Ottawa Methods Centre, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
出版信息
PLoS Med. 2010 Feb 16;7(2):e1000217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000217.
Abstract
David Moher and colleagues from the EQUATOR network offer guidance and recommended steps for developing health research reporting guidelines.
摘要
戴维·莫赫尔（David Moher）及其 EQUATOR 网络的同事为制定卫生研究报告指南提供了指导和建议步骤。
相似文献
1
Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines.健康研究报告规范开发者指南。
PLoS Med. 2010 Feb 16;7(2):e1000217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000217.
2
Describing reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review.描述健康研究报告规范：系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Jul;64(7):718-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.013. Epub 2011 Jan 8.
3
The EQUATOR Network and reporting guidelines: Helping to achieve high standards in reporting health research studies.赤道网络与报告指南：助力实现健康研究报告的高标准。
Maturitas. 2009 May 20;63(1):4-6. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.03.011. Epub 2009 Apr 15.
4
Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network.透明准确的报告可提高研究的可靠性、实用性和影响力：报告指南和 EQUATOR 网络。
BMC Med. 2010 Apr 26;8:24. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-24.
5
[Scientific reporting guidelines].[科学报告指南]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2009 Nov 19;129(22):2340. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.09.1099.
6
A history of the evolution of guidelines for reporting medical research: the long road to the EQUATOR Network.医学研究报告指南的演变历程：通往赤道网络的漫长道路。
J R Soc Med. 2016 Feb;109(2):67-77. doi: 10.1177/0141076815625599.
7
Elevating the quality of disability and rehabilitation research: mandatory use of the reporting guidelines.提升残疾与康复研究的质量：强制使用报告指南。
J Rehabil Med. 2014 May;46(5):385-6. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1829.
8
Elevating the quality of disability and rehabilitation research: mandatory use of the reporting guidelines.提升残疾与康复研究的质量：强制使用报告指南。
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2014 Spring;34(2):58-60. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.12.010.
9
Methodology and reporting quality of reporting guidelines: systematic review.报告指南的方法学与报告质量：系统评价
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Sep 22;15:74. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0069-z.
10
Reporting clinical research: guidance to encourage accurate and transparent research reporting.报告临床研究：鼓励准确和透明的研究报告的指南。
Maturitas. 2012 May;72(1):84-7. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.02.012. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
引用本文的文献
1
A protocol to develop a Quality Assessment Tool for Realist Synthesis (QUATRES).开发现实主义综合质量评估工具（QUATRES）的方案。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 10;20(9):e0332250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332250. eCollection 2025.
2
Improving the reporting on health equity in observational research (STROBE-Equity): extension checklist and elaboration.改进观察性研究中健康公平性的报告（STROBE-公平性）：扩展清单及阐述
BMJ. 2025 Sep 3;390:e083882. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-083882.
3
A Randomized Controlled Trial of an SMS-Based Brief Contact Intervention for People Bereaved by Suicide.一项针对自杀丧亲者的基于短信的简短接触干预随机对照试验。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2025 Oct;55(5):e70043. doi: 10.1111/sltb.70043.
4
[Chinese introduction to Preferred Reporting Items for Animal Studies in Endodontology 2021 checklist].[《2021年牙髓病学动物研究报告规范清单》中文介绍]
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2025 Aug 1;43(4):541-546. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2025.2025145.
5
Protocol for development of a checklist and guideline for transparent reporting of cluster analyses (TRoCA).制定聚类分析透明报告清单及指南（TRoCA）的方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 21;15(8):e099609. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099609.
6
Guideline-Based Clinical Decision Support Framework for Multimorbidity: Protocol for a Formulation and Testing Study.基于指南的多重疾病临床决策支持框架：制定与测试研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 14;14:e63339. doi: 10.2196/63339.
7
Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Medical Research (GAMER): Protocol for a Scoping Review and Development of Reporting Guidelines.医学研究中的生成式人工智能工具（GAMER）：范围综述与报告指南制定方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 14;14:e64640. doi: 10.2196/64640.
8
Reporting guidelines for music-based interventions: An update and validation study.基于音乐的干预措施报告指南：一项更新与验证研究。
Integr Med Res. 2025 Sep;14(3):101199. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2025.101199. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
9
Reporting Digital Health Implementations Based on the iCHECK-DH Guidelines and Checklist: Development of an Interactive Toolkit.基于iCHECK-DH指南和清单报告数字健康实施情况：交互式工具包的开发
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 8;27:e74235. doi: 10.2196/74235.
10
Reporting guideline for chatbot health advice studies: the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) statement.聊天机器人健康建议研究报告指南：聊天机器人评估报告工具（CHART）声明。
BMJ Med. 2025 Aug 1;4(1):e001632. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001632. eCollection 2025.
本文引用的文献
1
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目：PRISMA声明。
Open Med. 2009;3(3):e123-30. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
2
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目：PRISMA声明。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1006-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
3
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目：PRISMA声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
4
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目：PRISMA声明
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
5
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.评估卫生保健干预措施的研究的系统评价和Meta分析报告的PRISMA声明：解释与详述。
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.
6
STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE statement.加强遗传关联研究报告规范（STREGA）：STROBE声明的扩展
PLoS Med. 2009 Feb 3;6(2):e22. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000022.
7
An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist.一项国际调查表明存在未发表的系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Jun;62(6):617-623.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.09.014. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
8
Publication guidelines for improvement studies in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE Project.医疗保健改进研究的出版指南：SQUIRE项目的演变
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Nov 4;149(9):670-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00009.
9
Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias.关于研究发表偏倚和结果报告偏倚实证证据的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2008 Aug 28;3(8):e3081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003081.
10
Evaluating the evidence: statistical methods in randomized controlled trials in the urological literature.评估证据：泌尿外科文献中随机对照试验的统计方法
J Urol. 2008 Oct;180(4):1463-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.06.026. Epub 2008 Aug 16.
Zotero 插件