相似文献
1
Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines.
PLoS Med. 2010 Feb 16;7(2):e1000217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000217.
2
Describing reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Jul;64(7):718-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.013. Epub 2011 Jan 8.
3
The EQUATOR Network and reporting guidelines: Helping to achieve high standards in reporting health research studies.
Maturitas. 2009 May 20;63(1):4-6. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.03.011. Epub 2009 Apr 15.
4
Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network.
BMC Med. 2010 Apr 26;8:24. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-24.
5
[Scientific reporting guidelines].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2009 Nov 19;129(22):2340. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.09.1099.
6
A history of the evolution of guidelines for reporting medical research: the long road to the EQUATOR Network.
J R Soc Med. 2016 Feb;109(2):67-77. doi: 10.1177/0141076815625599.
7
Elevating the quality of disability and rehabilitation research: mandatory use of the reporting guidelines.
J Rehabil Med. 2014 May;46(5):385-6. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1829.
8
Elevating the quality of disability and rehabilitation research: mandatory use of the reporting guidelines.
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2014 Spring;34(2):58-60. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.12.010.
9
Methodology and reporting quality of reporting guidelines: systematic review.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Sep 22;15:74. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0069-z.
10
Reporting clinical research: guidance to encourage accurate and transparent research reporting.
Maturitas. 2012 May;72(1):84-7. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.02.012. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
引用本文的文献
1
A protocol to develop a Quality Assessment Tool for Realist Synthesis (QUATRES).
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 10;20(9):e0332250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332250. eCollection 2025.
2
Improving the reporting on health equity in observational research (STROBE-Equity): extension checklist and elaboration.
BMJ. 2025 Sep 3;390:e083882. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-083882.
3
A Randomized Controlled Trial of an SMS-Based Brief Contact Intervention for People Bereaved by Suicide.
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2025 Oct;55(5):e70043. doi: 10.1111/sltb.70043.
4
[Chinese introduction to Preferred Reporting Items for Animal Studies in Endodontology 2021 checklist].
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2025 Aug 1;43(4):541-546. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2025.2025145.
5
Protocol for development of a checklist and guideline for transparent reporting of cluster analyses (TRoCA).
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 21;15(8):e099609. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099609.
6
Guideline-Based Clinical Decision Support Framework for Multimorbidity: Protocol for a Formulation and Testing Study.
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 14;14:e63339. doi: 10.2196/63339.
7
Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Medical Research (GAMER): Protocol for a Scoping Review and Development of Reporting Guidelines.
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 14;14:e64640. doi: 10.2196/64640.
8
Reporting guidelines for music-based interventions: An update and validation study.
Integr Med Res. 2025 Sep;14(3):101199. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2025.101199. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
9
Reporting Digital Health Implementations Based on the iCHECK-DH Guidelines and Checklist: Development of an Interactive Toolkit.
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 8;27:e74235. doi: 10.2196/74235.
10
Reporting guideline for chatbot health advice studies: the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) statement.
BMJ Med. 2025 Aug 1;4(1):e001632. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001632. eCollection 2025.
本文引用的文献
1
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
Open Med. 2009;3(3):e123-30. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
2
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1006-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
3
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
4
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
5
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.
6
STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE statement.
PLoS Med. 2009 Feb 3;6(2):e22. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000022.
7
An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Jun;62(6):617-623.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.09.014. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
8
Publication guidelines for improvement studies in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE Project.
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Nov 4;149(9):670-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00009.
9
Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias.
PLoS One. 2008 Aug 28;3(8):e3081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003081.
10
Evaluating the evidence: statistical methods in randomized controlled trials in the urological literature.
J Urol. 2008 Oct;180(4):1463-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.06.026. Epub 2008 Aug 16.
Zotero 插件