Staub P O, Casu L, Leonti M
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, via Ospedale 72, 09124 Cagliari, Italy.
Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Cagliari, via Ospedale 72, Cagliari, Italy.
Phytomedicine. 2016 Sep 15;23(10):1043-52. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2016.06.016. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
De Materia Medica written by Pedanios Dioscorides (1 century CE) has shaped European and Mediterranean herbal medicine to a large extent. Despite its fundamental importance for modern medico-botanical traditions the content of this work has never been systematically assessed.
We present a quantitative survey of the botanical drugs described in De Materia Medica (ex Matthioli, 1568) and identify overall therapeutic, diachronic and botanical patterns. The extracted data may serve as a baseline and help to better contextualize research on herbal drugs and phytotherapy.
Therapeutic uses of herbal drugs were extracted through line-by-line reading of a digitized version of the treatise. For each plant usage mentioned in the text we recorded (I) the chapter number, (II) the putative botanical identity, (III) the plant part, (IV) the symptoms or disease, (V) the mode of administration, (VI) our biomedical interpretation of the ancient ailment or disease description as well as (VII) the organ- and symptom-defined category under which the use was filed.
An introduction to Dioscorides' De Materia Medica and Matthioli's Renaissance commentary is followed by a description of the employed methodology. The results and discussion section introduces the generated database comprising 5314 unique therapeutic uses of 536 plant taxa and 924 herbal drugs. Separate subsections address salient patterns such as the frequent recommendation of Fabaceae seeds for dermatology, Apiaceae seeds as antidotes and Apiaceae exudates for neurology and psychosomatic disorders as well as the heavy reliance on subterranean parts as drugs.
The therapeutic knowledge described in De Materia Medica (ex Matthioli, 1568) offers unique insights into classical Mediterranean epidemiology and herbal medicine. Drugs that lost importance over time as well as remedies used for diseases now controlled by preventive medicine and industrially produced drugs may be interesting starting points for research on herbal medicine and drug discovery. Apart from promoting future data mining, the study may also help to prove the tradition of use, which is required for the regulatory approval of certain herbal products.
佩达尼斯·狄奥斯科里季斯(公元1世纪)所著的《药物志》在很大程度上塑造了欧洲和地中海地区的草药医学。尽管这部著作对现代医学植物学传统具有至关重要的意义,但其内容从未得到系统评估。
我们对《药物志》(出自马蒂奥利,1568年)中描述的植物药进行了定量调查,并确定了总体治疗、历时性和植物学模式。提取的数据可作为基线,有助于更好地将草药和植物疗法的研究置于相应背景中。
通过逐行阅读该论著的数字化版本提取草药的治疗用途。对于文本中提及的每种植物用途,我们记录了:(I)章节编号;(II)假定的植物身份;(III)植物部位;(IV)症状或疾病;(V)给药方式;(VI)我们对古代疾病描述的生物医学解释;以及(VII)该用途所属的器官和症状定义类别。
首先介绍狄奥斯科里季斯的《药物志》和马蒂奥利的文艺复兴时期评注,接着描述所采用的方法。结果与讨论部分介绍了生成的数据库,该数据库包含536个植物分类群和924种草药的5314种独特治疗用途。单独的子部分讨论了一些显著模式,如豆科种子常用于皮肤病治疗、伞形科种子用作解毒剂、伞形科分泌物用于神经学和身心疾病,以及对地下部分作为药物的高度依赖。
《药物志》(出自马蒂奥利,1568年)中描述的治疗知识为古典地中海地区的流行病学和草药医学提供了独特见解。随着时间推移失去重要性的药物以及用于现在由预防医学和工业生产药物控制的疾病的疗法,可能是草药医学研究和药物发现的有趣起点。除了促进未来的数据挖掘外,该研究还可能有助于证明某些草药产品监管批准所需的使用传统。