Wein Yossi, Bar Shira Enav, Friedman Aharon
Department of Animal Sciences, Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environmental Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, PO Box 12, Rehovot 7610001, Israel.
Department of Animal Sciences, Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environmental Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, PO Box 12, Rehovot 7610001, Israel
Poult Sci. 2017 Jan 1;96(1):65-73. doi: 10.3382/ps/pew245. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
Due to increase in awareness of poultry welfare and concomitant legislation, it has become necessary to determine poultry's response to stress, with minimal harm and maximum reliability. Several methods to determine the response to physiological stress were developed throughout the years to identify stressors and to measure stress in poultry. The most commonly used are plasma corticosterone levels and peripheral blood heterophil/lymphocyte ratio (H/L ratio). However, the value of these responses to determine a state of stress has been questioned in several instances, as these parameters are increased during the process of bird handling and blood sampling irrespective of the general state of stress. Due to these limitations, it appears that the classic stress markers might be sub-optimal in evaluating stress in poultry, particularly those encountered in high-stress environments. Thus, there is a continuing need for stress indicators, preferably indicators that are quantitative, highly repeatable, not influenced by handling and sampling, determined in peripheral blood, represent an initial response to the stressor, and do not daily fluctuate. As the immune system has been shown to rapidly respond to stress, we assessed pro-inflammatory gene expression in peripheral blood cells as an indicator for stress. We initially show that while corticosterone plasma levels and the H/L ratio were responsive to handling and blood sampling, pro-inflammatory gene expression (lysozyme, IL-1β, IL-6, and HSP-70) was not. We then determined the expression of the same pro-inflammatory genes during acute stress (transit) in layer pullets (hen and turkey) and during chronic stress (different caging densities of layers utilizing 2, 3, and 4 hens/cage). While gene expression was significantly and highly elevated during transit, the effect of differing caging densities on gene expression was minimal; collectively, this might indicate that expression of pro-inflammatory genes is more responsive to acute stress than to chronic stressors. We propose to use pro-inflammatory gene expression in peripheral blood cells to measure responses to stress in poultry.
由于家禽福利意识的提高以及相应立法的出台,有必要在对家禽造成最小伤害且保证最大可靠性的前提下,确定家禽对压力的反应。多年来,人们开发了几种确定对生理压力反应的方法,以识别应激源并测量家禽的压力。最常用的是血浆皮质酮水平和外周血嗜异性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率(H/L比率)。然而,这些反应对于确定应激状态的价值在一些情况下受到了质疑,因为无论总体应激状态如何,在抓鸡和采血过程中这些参数都会升高。由于这些局限性,经典的应激标志物在评估家禽应激时可能并非最佳选择,尤其是在高应激环境中遇到的情况。因此,持续需要应激指标,最好是定量的、高度可重复的、不受处理和采样影响的、在外周血中测定的、代表对应激源的初始反应且无每日波动的指标。由于免疫系统已被证明能快速对应激做出反应,我们评估了外周血细胞中促炎基因的表达作为应激指标。我们首先表明,虽然皮质酮血浆水平和H/L比率对处理和采血有反应,但促炎基因表达(溶菌酶、IL-1β、IL-6和HSP-70)并非如此。然后,我们测定了蛋鸡(母鸡和火鸡)在急性应激(运输)期间以及慢性应激(使用2、3和4只母鸡/笼的不同笼养密度的蛋鸡)期间相同促炎基因的表达。虽然在运输过程中基因表达显著且大幅升高,但不同笼养密度对基因表达的影响很小;总体而言,这可能表明促炎基因的表达对急性应激的反应比对慢性应激源的反应更敏感。我们建议使用外周血细胞中的促炎基因表达来测量家禽对应激的反应。