Walter Margot J M, Van't Spijker Adriaan, Pasma Annelieke, Hazes Johanna M W, Luime Jolanda J
Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Postal Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychiatry, Section Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Qual Life Res. 2017 Feb;26(2):291-298. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1369-4. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
Doctors frequently see patients who have difficulties coping with their disease and rate their disease activity high, despite the fact that according to the doctors, the disease activity is low. This study explored the patients' perspectives on this discordance that may help to understand why for some patients, usual care seems to be insufficient.
In our qualitative study we conducted focus group interviews where questions were used as a guideline. Transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.
Twenty-nine patients participated in four focus groups. Participants could not put their finger exactly on why doctors estimated that their disease activity was low, while they experienced high levels of disease activity. During the in-depth focus interviews, seven themes emerged that appeared related to high experienced disease activity: (1) perceived stress, (2) balancing activities and rest, (3) medication intake, (4) social stress, (5) relationship with professionals, (6) comorbidity, and (7) physical fitness.
When patients were asked why their view of their disease activity was different from that of their physician, seven themes emerged. The way participants coped with these themes seemed to be the predominant concept. Specific interventions that focus on one or more of the reported themes and on coping may improve not only the quality of life of these patients but also the satisfaction with the patient-doctor relationship for both parties.
医生经常会遇到一些患者,尽管医生认为其疾病活动度较低,但这些患者却难以应对自身疾病,且认为自己的疾病活动度很高。本研究探讨了患者对这种差异的看法,这可能有助于理解为何对某些患者而言,常规治疗似乎并不充分。
在我们的定性研究中,我们进行了焦点小组访谈,并以问题作为指导方针。使用归纳主题分析法对访谈记录进行分析。
29名患者参与了4个焦点小组。参与者无法确切指出为何医生认为他们的疾病活动度较低,而他们却感受到高水平的疾病活动度。在深入的焦点访谈中,出现了七个与高水平疾病活动度相关的主题:(1)感知到的压力,(2)活动与休息的平衡,(3)药物摄入,(4)社会压力,(5)与专业人员的关系,(6)合并症,以及(7)身体健康状况。
当被问及为何他们对自身疾病活动度的看法与医生不同时,出现了七个主题。参与者应对这些主题的确方式似乎是主要概念。专注于所报告的一个或多个主题以及应对方式的特定干预措施,不仅可能改善这些患者的生活质量,还可能提高双方对医患关系的满意度。