Suppr超能文献

同步性转移透明细胞肾细胞癌:一种独特的形态学、免疫组织化学及分子表型

Synchronous Metastatic Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Distinct Morphologic, Immunohistochemical, and Molecular Phenotype.

作者信息

Kammerer-Jacquet Solene-Florence, Brunot Angelique, Pladys Adelaide, Bouzille Guillaume, Dagher Julien, Medane Sarah, Peyronnet Benoit, Mathieu Romain, Verhoest Gregory, Bensalah Karim, Edeline Julien, Laguerre Brigitte, Lespagnol Alexandra, Mosser Jean, Dugay Frederic, Belaud-Rotureau Marc-Antoine, Rioux-Leclercq Nathalie

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University Hospital, Rennes, France; CNRS, UMR6290, Institut de Génétique & Développement de Rennes, Rennes 1 University, Rennes, France.

Department of Medical Oncology, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer, Rennes, France.

出版信息

Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Feb;15(1):e1-e7. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 27.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCCs) are highly metastatic tumors with metastases detected at diagnosis (synchronous) or during follow-up (metachronous). To date, there have been no reports comparing primary ccRCC of patients with synchronous and metachronous metastases, who are different in terms of prognosis. Determining whether there is a phenotypic difference between these 2 groups could have important clinical implications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a retrospective consecutive cohort of 98 patients with ccRCC, 48 patients had metastases, including 28 synchronous and 20 metachronous presentations, with a follow-up of 10 years. For each primary tumor in these metastatic patients, pathologic criteria, expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, partitioning-defective 3, CAIX, and programmed death ligand 1 as detected by immunohistochemistry, and complete VHL status were analyzed. Univariate analysis was performed, and survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves compared by log-rank test.

RESULTS

Compared with primary ccRCC in patients with metachronous metastases, primary ccRCC in patients with synchronous metastases were significantly associated with a poorer Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance (P = .045), higher pT status (P = .038), non-inactivated VHL gene (P = .01), sarcomatoid component (P = .007), expression of partitioning-defective 3 (P = .007), and overexpressions of vascular endothelial growth factor (> 50%) (P = .017) and programmed death ligand 1 (P = .019). Patients with synchronous metastases had a worse cancer-specific survival than patients with metachronous metastases even from metastatic diagnosis (median survival, 16 months vs. 46 months, respectively; P = .01).

CONCLUSION

This long-term study is the first to support the notion that synchronous m-ccRCC has a distinct phenotype. This is probably linked to the occurrence of oncogenic events that could explain the worse prognosis. These particular patients with metastases could benefit from specific therapy.

摘要

引言

透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)是具有高转移性的肿瘤,转移灶可在诊断时(同时性)或随访期间(异时性)被发现。迄今为止,尚无关于比较同时性和异时性转移患者的原发性ccRCC的报道,这两组患者在预后方面有所不同。确定这两组之间是否存在表型差异可能具有重要的临床意义。

患者与方法

在一项对98例ccRCC患者的回顾性连续队列研究中,48例患者发生转移,包括28例同时性转移和20例异时性转移,随访时间为10年。对这些转移性患者的每例原发性肿瘤,分析其病理标准、免疫组化检测的血管内皮生长因子、分隔缺陷3、CAIX和程序性死亡配体1的表达,以及完整的VHL状态。进行单因素分析,并使用Kaplan-Meier曲线通过对数秩检验比较评估生存率。

结果

与异时性转移患者的原发性ccRCC相比,同时性转移患者的原发性ccRCC与较差的东部肿瘤协作组体能状态显著相关(P = 0.045)、更高的pT分期(P = 0.038)、VHL基因未失活(P = 0.01)、肉瘤样成分(P = 0.007)、分隔缺陷3的表达(P = 0.007)以及血管内皮生长因子(> 50%)(P = 0.017)和程序性死亡配体1(P = 0.019)的过表达。即使从转移诊断开始,同时性转移患者的癌症特异性生存率也比异时性转移患者差(中位生存期分别为16个月和46个月;P = 0.01)。

结论

这项长期研究首次支持了同时性转移性ccRCC具有独特表型的观点。这可能与致癌事件的发生有关,这可以解释其较差的预后。这些特定的转移患者可能从特定治疗中获益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验