Kammerer-Jacquet Solene-Florence, Brunot Angelique, Pladys Adelaide, Bouzille Guillaume, Dagher Julien, Medane Sarah, Peyronnet Benoit, Mathieu Romain, Verhoest Gregory, Bensalah Karim, Edeline Julien, Laguerre Brigitte, Lespagnol Alexandra, Mosser Jean, Dugay Frederic, Belaud-Rotureau Marc-Antoine, Rioux-Leclercq Nathalie
Department of Pathology, University Hospital, Rennes, France; CNRS, UMR6290, Institut de Génétique & Développement de Rennes, Rennes 1 University, Rennes, France.
Department of Medical Oncology, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer, Rennes, France.
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Feb;15(1):e1-e7. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
Clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCCs) are highly metastatic tumors with metastases detected at diagnosis (synchronous) or during follow-up (metachronous). To date, there have been no reports comparing primary ccRCC of patients with synchronous and metachronous metastases, who are different in terms of prognosis. Determining whether there is a phenotypic difference between these 2 groups could have important clinical implications.
In a retrospective consecutive cohort of 98 patients with ccRCC, 48 patients had metastases, including 28 synchronous and 20 metachronous presentations, with a follow-up of 10 years. For each primary tumor in these metastatic patients, pathologic criteria, expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, partitioning-defective 3, CAIX, and programmed death ligand 1 as detected by immunohistochemistry, and complete VHL status were analyzed. Univariate analysis was performed, and survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves compared by log-rank test.
Compared with primary ccRCC in patients with metachronous metastases, primary ccRCC in patients with synchronous metastases were significantly associated with a poorer Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance (P = .045), higher pT status (P = .038), non-inactivated VHL gene (P = .01), sarcomatoid component (P = .007), expression of partitioning-defective 3 (P = .007), and overexpressions of vascular endothelial growth factor (> 50%) (P = .017) and programmed death ligand 1 (P = .019). Patients with synchronous metastases had a worse cancer-specific survival than patients with metachronous metastases even from metastatic diagnosis (median survival, 16 months vs. 46 months, respectively; P = .01).
This long-term study is the first to support the notion that synchronous m-ccRCC has a distinct phenotype. This is probably linked to the occurrence of oncogenic events that could explain the worse prognosis. These particular patients with metastases could benefit from specific therapy.
透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)是具有高转移性的肿瘤,转移灶可在诊断时(同时性)或随访期间(异时性)被发现。迄今为止,尚无关于比较同时性和异时性转移患者的原发性ccRCC的报道,这两组患者在预后方面有所不同。确定这两组之间是否存在表型差异可能具有重要的临床意义。
在一项对98例ccRCC患者的回顾性连续队列研究中,48例患者发生转移,包括28例同时性转移和20例异时性转移,随访时间为10年。对这些转移性患者的每例原发性肿瘤,分析其病理标准、免疫组化检测的血管内皮生长因子、分隔缺陷3、CAIX和程序性死亡配体1的表达,以及完整的VHL状态。进行单因素分析,并使用Kaplan-Meier曲线通过对数秩检验比较评估生存率。
与异时性转移患者的原发性ccRCC相比,同时性转移患者的原发性ccRCC与较差的东部肿瘤协作组体能状态显著相关(P = 0.045)、更高的pT分期(P = 0.038)、VHL基因未失活(P = 0.01)、肉瘤样成分(P = 0.007)、分隔缺陷3的表达(P = 0.007)以及血管内皮生长因子(> 50%)(P = 0.017)和程序性死亡配体1(P = 0.019)的过表达。即使从转移诊断开始,同时性转移患者的癌症特异性生存率也比异时性转移患者差(中位生存期分别为16个月和46个月;P = 0.01)。
这项长期研究首次支持了同时性转移性ccRCC具有独特表型的观点。这可能与致癌事件的发生有关,这可以解释其较差的预后。这些特定的转移患者可能从特定治疗中获益。