Necchi Andrea, Lo Vullo Salvatore, Bregni Marco, Rosti Giovanni, Mariani Luigi, Raggi Daniele, Giannatempo Patrizia, Secondino Simona, Schumacher Kathrin, Massard Christophe, Kanfer Edward, Oechsle Karin, Laszlo Daniele, Michieli Mariagrazia, Ifrah Norbert, Mercier Melanie, Crysandt Martina, Wuchter Patrick, Nagler Arnon, Wahlin Anders, Martino Massimo, Badoglio Manuela, Pedrazzoli Paolo, Lanza Francesco
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Feb;15(1):163-167. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.06.013. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
The optimal management of advanced seminoma that relapses after chemotherapy remains unknown. We retrospectively analyzed outcomes with the use of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT).
Eligibility included adult male patients with pure seminomatous histology and treatment with salvage HDCT. Data of patients who received HDCT from 13 European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) centers were used. Multivariable Cox analyses evaluated the association of prespecified factors (line of treatment, prior radiotherapy, and chemosensitivity according to standard definition), with progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The prognostic ability of the model was assessed through the concordance statistic.
From December 2002 to December 2012, 46 cases were identified. Median age was 38 years (interquartile range, 35-46 years). HDCT was provided as second-line therapy (n = 14, 30.4%) and in third-line or beyond third-line therapy (n = 20, 43.5%; 12 had missing information). Sixteen patients (34.8%) received paraortic and/or iliac radiotherapy, and 10 (21.7%) had disease that was cisplatin refractory or absolutely refractory. Median follow-up was 22 months (interquartile range, 8-56). On multivariable Cox analysis, refractory disease was a significantly negative prognostic factor for both PFS (hazard ratio, 6.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.86-19.64) and OS (hazard ratio, 3.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-14.45), while prior radiotherapy trended to significance for both. The c index was 0.74 and 0.66 for PFS and OS, respectively. The small numbers and the lack of any comparison with conventional-dose chemotherapy are major study limitations.
Despite our small sample size, this retrospective analysis suggested that HDCT may represent a valuable therapeutic option for patients with a pure seminoma after standard-dose chemotherapy failure. Our observation requires validation through a prospective study.
化疗后复发的晚期精原细胞瘤的最佳治疗方案尚不清楚。我们回顾性分析了大剂量化疗(HDCT)的治疗结果。
纳入标准包括组织学类型为纯精原细胞瘤且接受挽救性HDCT治疗的成年男性患者。使用了来自13个欧洲血液和骨髓移植学会(EBMT)中心接受HDCT治疗的患者数据。多变量Cox分析评估了预先设定的因素(治疗线数、既往放疗以及根据标准定义的化疗敏感性)与无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)之间的关联。通过一致性统计量评估模型的预后能力。
2002年12月至2012年12月,共纳入46例患者。中位年龄为38岁(四分位间距为35 - 46岁)。HDCT作为二线治疗(n = 14,30.4%)以及三线或三线以上治疗(n = 20,43.5%;12例信息缺失)。16例患者(34.8%)接受了腹主动脉旁和/或髂骨放疗,10例(21.7%)患有顺铂难治或绝对难治性疾病。中位随访时间为22个月(四分位间距为8 - 56个月)。多变量Cox分析显示,难治性疾病是PFS(风险比,6.04;95%置信区间,1.86 - 19.64)和OS(风险比,3.93;95%置信区间,1.07 - 14.45)的显著负性预后因素,而既往放疗在两者中均有趋于显著的趋势。PFS和OS的c指数分别为0.74和0.66。样本量小以及缺乏与传统剂量化疗的任何比较是本研究的主要局限性。
尽管我们的样本量较小,但这项回顾性分析表明,对于标准剂量化疗失败后的纯精原细胞瘤患者,HDCT可能是一种有价值的治疗选择。我们的观察结果需要通过前瞻性研究进行验证。