Gilles Annick, Schlee Winny, Rabau Sarah, Wouters Kristien, Fransen Erik, Van de Heyning Paul
University Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University HospitalEdegem, Belgium; Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of AntwerpWilrijk, Belgium; Department of Human and Social Welfare, University College GhentGhent, Belgium.
University Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz Konstanz, Germany.
Front Neurosci. 2016 Jun 28;10:288. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00288. eCollection 2016.
Young people are often exposed to high music levels which make them more at risk to develop noise-induced symptoms such as hearing loss, hyperacusis, and tinnitus of which the latter is the symptom perceived the most by young adults. Although, subclinical neural damage was demonstrated in animal experiments, the human correlate remains under debate. Controversy exists on the underlying condition of young adults with normal hearing thresholds and noise-induced tinnitus (NIT) due to leisure noise. The present study aimed to assess differences in audiological characteristics between noise-exposed adolescents with and without NIT.
A group of 87 young adults with a history of recreational noise exposure was investigated by use of the following tests: otoscopy, impedance measurements, pure-tone audiometry including high-frequencies, transient and distortion product otoacoustic emissions, speech-in-noise testing with continuous and modulated noise (amplitude-modulated by 15 Hz), auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and questionnaires.Nineteen students reported NIT due to recreational noise exposure, and their measures were compared to the non-tinnitus subjects.
No significant differences between tinnitus and non-tinnitus subjects could be found for hearing thresholds, otoacoustic emissions, and ABR results.Tinnitus subjects had significantly worse speech reception in noise compared to non-tinnitus subjects for sentences embedded in steady-state noise (mean speech reception threshold (SRT) scores, respectively -5.77 and -6.90 dB SNR; p = 0.025) as well as for sentences embedded in 15 Hz AM-noise (mean SRT scores, respectively -13.04 and -15.17 dB SNR; p = 0.013). In both groups speech reception was significantly improved during AM-15 Hz noise compared to the steady-state noise condition (p < 0.001). However, the modulation masking release was not affected by the presence of NIT.
Young adults with and without NIT did not differ regarding audiometry, OAE, and ABR.However, tinnitus patients showed decreased speech-in-noise reception. The results are discussed in the light of previous findings suggestion NIT may occur in the absence of measurable peripheral damage as reflected in speech-in-noise deficits in tinnitus subjects.
年轻人经常接触高强度音乐,这使他们更易出现诸如听力损失、听觉过敏和耳鸣等噪声诱发症状,其中耳鸣是年轻人最常感觉到的症状。虽然动物实验已证明存在亚临床神经损伤,但人类相关情况仍存在争议。对于听力阈值正常且因休闲噪声导致噪声性耳鸣(NIT)的年轻人的潜在状况存在争议。本研究旨在评估有和没有NIT的噪声暴露青少年在听力学特征上的差异。
对一组有娱乐性噪声暴露史的87名年轻人进行了以下测试:耳镜检查、阻抗测量、包括高频在内的纯音听力测定、瞬态和畸变产物耳声发射、连续和调制噪声(由15 Hz调幅)的噪声中言语测试、听觉脑干反应(ABR)以及问卷调查。19名学生报告因娱乐性噪声暴露出现NIT,并将他们的测量结果与无耳鸣受试者进行比较。
耳鸣和无耳鸣受试者在听力阈值、耳声发射和ABR结果方面未发现显著差异。与无耳鸣受试者相比,耳鸣受试者在稳态噪声中嵌入的句子以及15 Hz调幅噪声中嵌入的句子的噪声中言语接受能力明显更差(平均言语接受阈值(SRT)分数分别为-5.77和-6.90 dB SNR;p = 0.025)以及(平均SRT分数分别为-13.04和-15.17 dB SNR;p = 0.013)。与稳态噪声条件相比,两组在15 Hz调幅噪声期间言语接受能力均有显著改善(p < 0.001)。然而,调制掩蔽释放不受NIT存在的影响。
有和没有NIT的年轻人在听力测定、耳声发射和ABR方面没有差异。然而,耳鸣患者的噪声中言语接受能力下降。根据先前的研究结果对这些结果进行了讨论,这些结果表明NIT可能在没有可测量的外周损伤的情况下发生,如耳鸣受试者的噪声中言语缺陷所反映的那样。