• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连接类型和种植体数量对下颌全牙弓修复生物力学行为的影响。

Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.

作者信息

Sousa Ravel M, Simamoto-Junior Paulo Cézar, Fernandes-Neto Alfredo Júlio, Sloten Jos Vander, Jaecques Siegfried Vn, Pessoa Roberto S

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):750-60. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4785.

DOI:10.11607/jomi.4785
PMID:27447140
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of different implant numbers and connection types on the biomechanical behavior of mandibular full-arch implant-supported rehabilitation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Computed tomography-based finite element models comprising a totally edentulous mandible and 3.8 × 13-mmdiameter implants, abutments, abutment screws, bar retaining screw, and bar were constructed. Different implant numbers (three, four, and five implants) and loading conditions (symmetrical/balanced, unilateral, and posterior with diverse loading magnitudes) were simulated for both external hex and Morse-taper connections. The peak equivalent strain (EQV strain) in the bone and the peak of von Mises stress (EQV stress) in the abutment screw and bar retaining screw were evaluated.

RESULTS

Lower strain values were observed for a symmetrical loading distribution. Considering the same loading conditions, significantly higher bone strain levels were observed for external hex, compared with the Morse-taper connection. The number of implants had no significant influence on strain levels in bone, irrespective of the connection types. Compared with the external hex connection, the Morse-taper connection type presented significantly lower EQV stress values in abutment screws, but significantly higher stress in the bar retaining screw. Increasing the number of implants significantly reduced the EQV stress in the abutment screw and bar retaining screw.

CONCLUSION

The Morse-taper connection type significantly decreased the strain levels in peri-implant bone, while increasing the stress in bar retaining screws. A smaller number of implants in an inferior full-arch rehabilitation slightly increased the stress in the abutment and bar retaining screws. Balanced adjustments of the loading improve the biomechanics of a mandibular full-arch rehabilitation.

摘要

目的

评估不同种植体数量和连接类型对下颌全牙弓种植体支持修复体生物力学行为的影响。

材料与方法

构建基于计算机断层扫描的有限元模型,包括完全无牙的下颌骨以及直径为3.8×13 mm的种植体、基台、基台螺钉、杆卡固位螺钉和杆。针对外六角连接和莫氏锥度连接,模拟了不同的种植体数量(3颗、4颗和5颗种植体)和加载条件(对称/平衡、单侧以及不同加载大小的后部加载)。评估了骨中的峰值等效应变(EQV应变)以及基台螺钉和杆卡固位螺钉中的冯·米塞斯应力峰值(EQV应力)。

结果

对称加载分布时观察到较低的应变值。在相同加载条件下,与莫氏锥度连接相比,外六角连接的骨应变水平显著更高。无论连接类型如何,种植体数量对骨中的应变水平均无显著影响。与外六角连接相比,莫氏锥度连接类型在基台螺钉中的EQV应力值显著更低,但在杆卡固位螺钉中的应力显著更高。增加种植体数量显著降低了基台螺钉和杆卡固位螺钉中的EQV应力。

结论

莫氏锥度连接类型显著降低了种植体周围骨中的应变水平,同时增加了杆卡固位螺钉中的应力。在下颌全牙弓修复中种植体数量较少会略微增加基台和杆卡固位螺钉中的应力。均衡调整加载可改善下颌全牙弓修复的生物力学性能。

相似文献

1
Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.连接类型和种植体数量对下颌全牙弓修复生物力学行为的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):750-60. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4785.
2
Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching: different mismatch sizes, connection types, and implant protocols.平台转换的生物力学评估:不同的不匹配尺寸、连接类型和种植方案。
J Periodontol. 2014 Sep;85(9):1161-71. doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.130633. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
3
Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols: computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.不同种植体方案中平台转换的生物力学评估:基于计算机断层扫描的三维有限元分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Sep-Oct;25(5):911-9.
4
Biomechanical Effect of Prosthetic Connection and Implant Body Shape in Low-Quality Bone of Maxillary Posterior Single Implant-Supported Restorations.上颌后牙单颗种植支持修复体在低质量骨中假体连接和种植体形状的生物力学效应
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):e92-7. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4133.
5
Biomechanical Analysis of Implant-Supported Prostheses with Different Implant-Abutment Connections.不同种植体-基台连接方式的种植体支持式修复体的生物力学分析
Int J Prosthodont. 2015 Nov-Dec;28(6):621-3. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4258.
6
Bone Remodeling Around Implants with External Hexagon and Morse-Taper Connections: A Randomized, Controlled, Split-Mouth, Clinical Trial.具有外六边形和莫氏锥度连接的种植体周围骨重塑:一项随机、对照、分口临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Feb;19(1):97-110. doi: 10.1111/cid.12437. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
7
Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Implant-Abutment Connections, Retention Systems, and Restorative Materials in the Implant-Supported Single Crowns Using 3D Finite Element Analysis.基于三维有限元分析的种植体支持的单冠中不同种植体-基台连接、固位系统和修复材料的生物力学评价。
J Oral Implantol. 2022 Jun 1;48(3):194-201. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-20-00328.
8
A Comparison of Torque Stress on Abutment Screw of External Hexagon and Morse Taper Implant.外六角与莫氏锥度种植体基台螺钉的扭矩应力比较
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Nov 1;19(11):1306-1311.
9
Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses.轴向和倾斜种植体在下颌全口固定义齿修复中的生物力学比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):976-84.
10
Finite element analysis of stress extent at peri-implant bone surrounding external hexagon or Morse taper implants.外六角或莫氏锥度种植体周围种植体周围骨应力范围的有限元分析。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Jul;71:441-447. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the biomechanical effects of the post-core crown, endocrown and inlay crown after deep margin elevation and its clinical significance.深边缘提升后桩核冠、内冠和嵌体冠的生物力学效果比较及其临床意义。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 23;24(1):990. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04604-z.
2
Five years of radiographic evaluation for the peri-implant bone changes of all-on-four implant prostheses constructed from different framework materials using different digital construction techniques.采用不同数字化构建技术的不同框架材料构建的全口即刻负重种植体修复五年的影像学骨变化评估。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 7;24(1):910. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04642-7.
3
The use of three implants to support a fixed prosthesis in the management of the edentulous mandible: a systematic review.
使用三颗种植体支撑下颌无牙颌的固定义齿修复:系统评价。
Int J Implant Dent. 2022 Jun 17;8(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40729-022-00423-5.
4
Implant-supported bar overdentures in patients treated surgically for head and neck cancer: Two case reports.头颈部癌手术治疗患者的种植体支持杆覆盖义齿:两例病例报告。
Clin Case Rep. 2022 Mar 1;10(3):e05504. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.5504. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
Mechanical analysis of prosthetic bars and dental implants in 3 and 4 implant-supported overdenture protocols using finite element analysis.使用有限元分析对采用3种植体和4种植体支持的覆盖义齿修复方案中的修复杆和牙种植体进行力学分析。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2021 Jul-Sep;11(3):438-441. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 May 15.
6
Clinical Behavior and Complications of Mandibular Full-Arch Fixed Dental Prostheses Supported by Three Dental Implants. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.由三颗牙种植体支持的下颌全牙弓固定义齿的临床行为及并发症:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Biology (Basel). 2021 Apr 8;10(4):308. doi: 10.3390/biology10040308.