Suppr超能文献

外六角与莫氏锥度种植体基台螺钉的扭矩应力比较

A Comparison of Torque Stress on Abutment Screw of External Hexagon and Morse Taper Implant.

作者信息

Rodrigues Eduardo Dos S, Benetti Paula, Carli João P De, Paranhos Luiz R, Santos Pâmela L, Linden Maria Ss

机构信息

School of Dentistry, University of Passo Fundo (UPF-RS), Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Passo Fundo (UPF-RS), Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

出版信息

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Nov 1;19(11):1306-1311.

Abstract

AIM

This three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis observed the stress distribution on the prosthetic screws on external hexagon implant and morse taper implant with different tightening loads.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For this, two different 3D models assembly were obtained from the manufacturer and transferred to finite element analysis software: External hex implant model (EHM), and Morse taper implant model (MTM), both compounds by 3.75 × 7 mm implant, abutment and abutment screw. Bolt pretension force was applied on the shaft next to the threads of the prosthetic abutment. Preload was calculated using the torque on the prosthetic screw as recommended by the manufacturer (EHM30 and MTM20) and 10 Ncm torque above the manufacturer recommendations (EHM40 and MTM30). Maximum von mises equivalent stresses were obtained on the screws.

RESULTS

Preload values results were 243.18N (EHM30), 229.71N (MTM20), 324.24N (EHM40) and 344.57N (MTM30). In EHM30, EHM40 and MTM20 models the maximum stresses were below the yield strength of the abutment screw material. However, the maximum stress in MTM30 model was higher than the reference value.

CONCLUSION

The torque loads above the manufacturer recommendations can cause plastic deformation in the MT abutment screw threads. The screws of morse taper implant can be more sensitive to higher loads than external hexagon implant.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The adequate torque can result in screw loosening, while fracture may occur if torque is excessive. Abutment screw suffers many screwing cycles in its lifetime in a way that some tightening forces are above manufacturer recommendations.

摘要

目的

本三维(3D)有限元分析观察了不同拧紧载荷下外六角种植体和莫氏锥度种植体上修复螺钉的应力分布。

材料与方法

为此,从制造商处获得了两种不同的3D模型组件,并将其转移到有限元分析软件中:外六角种植体模型(EHM)和莫氏锥度种植体模型(MTM),两者均由3.75×7mm种植体、基台和基台螺钉组成。在修复基台螺纹旁边的轴上施加螺栓预紧力。使用制造商推荐的修复螺钉扭矩(EHM30和MTM20)以及高于制造商推荐值10Ncm的扭矩(EHM40和MTM30)计算预紧力。在螺钉上获得最大冯·米塞斯等效应力。

结果

预紧力值结果分别为243.18N(EHM30)、229.71N(MTM20)、324.24N(EHM40)和344.57N(MTM30)。在EHM30、EHM40和MTM20模型中,最大应力低于基台螺钉材料的屈服强度。然而,MTM30模型中的最大应力高于参考值。

结论

高于制造商推荐值的扭矩载荷会导致莫氏锥度基台螺钉螺纹发生塑性变形。与外六角种植体相比,莫氏锥度种植体的螺钉对更高载荷可能更敏感。

临床意义

适当的扭矩可能导致螺钉松动,而扭矩过大则可能发生骨折。基台螺钉在其使用寿命中会经历多次拧紧循环,在某种程度上,一些拧紧力高于制造商的推荐值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验