Suppr超能文献

在有缺陷和无缺陷拔牙窝中进行牙槽嵴保存术后的再生需求:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描研究。

Regenerative Needs Following Alveolar Ridge Preservation Procedures in Compromised and Noncompromised Extraction Sockets: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.

作者信息

Koutouzis Theofilos, Lipton David

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):849-54. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4437.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the necessity for additional regenerative procedures following healing of compromised and noncompromised extraction sockets with alveolar ridge preservation procedures through the use of virtual implant imaging software.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The cohort was comprised of 87 consecutive patients subjected to a single maxillary tooth extraction with an alveolar ridge preservation procedure for subsequent implant placement. Patients were divided into two main groups based on the integrity of the buccal bone plate following teeth extraction. Patients in the compromised socket (CS) group (n = 52) had partial or complete buccal bone plate loss, and patients in the noncompromised socket (NCS) group (n = 35) exhibited no bone loss of their socket walls following tooth extraction. Following 4 to 6 months of healing, all patients had a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) study. Root-formed implants were placed virtually in an ideal prosthetic position. The number of implants per group and location (anterior, premolar, molar) exhibiting exposed buccal implant surface was calculated.

RESULTS

In the CS group, 5 out of 19 anterior implants (26.3%), 4 out of 14 premolar implants (28.5%), and 7 out of 19 molar implants (36.8%) had exposed buccal surfaces. In the NCS group, 4 out of 9 anterior implants (44.4%), 2 out of 9 premolar implants (22.2%), and 4 out of 17 molar implants (23.5%) had exposed buccal surfaces. There were no statistically significant differences for intragroup and intergroup comparisons (χ² test, P > .05).

CONCLUSION

This study failed to find statistically significant differences in the frequency of implants with exposed buccal surfaces placed virtually, following treatment of compromised and noncompromised sockets. A high proportion (22% to 44%) of sites had implants that potentially needed additional regenerative procedures.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过使用虚拟种植成像软件,评估在采用牙槽嵴保存术的情况下,受损和未受损拔牙窝愈合后进行额外再生程序的必要性。

材料与方法

该队列由87例连续接受上颌单颗牙拔除并采用牙槽嵴保存术以便后续种植的患者组成。根据拔牙后颊侧骨板的完整性将患者分为两个主要组。受损牙槽窝(CS)组(n = 52)有部分或完全的颊侧骨板缺失,未受损牙槽窝(NCS)组(n = 35)在拔牙后牙槽窝壁无骨丢失。愈合4至6个月后,所有患者均进行了锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)检查。将根形种植体虚拟放置在理想的修复位置。计算每组中显示颊侧种植体表面暴露的种植体数量及位置(前部、前磨牙、磨牙)。

结果

在CS组中,19颗前部种植体中有5颗(26.3%)、14颗前磨牙种植体中有4颗(28.5%)、19颗磨牙种植体中有7颗(36.8%)颊侧表面暴露。在NCS组中,9颗前部种植体中有4颗(44.4%)、9颗前磨牙种植体中有2颗(22.2%)、17颗磨牙种植体中有4颗(23.5%)颊侧表面暴露。组内和组间比较均无统计学显著差异(χ²检验,P > .05)。

结论

本研究未能发现受损和未受损牙槽窝治疗后虚拟放置的颊侧表面暴露种植体频率存在统计学显著差异。相当比例(22%至44%)的部位种植体可能需要额外的再生程序。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验