Department of Periodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Department of Emergency, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Jun;20(3):333-344. doi: 10.1111/cid.12585. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
Studies of the extracted infected-molar ridge preservation are limited.
To compare alterations of hard and soft tissue in infected-molar sockets receiving ridge preservation compared with natural healing.
Thirty-five infected-molar extraction sites either preserving with Bio-Gide membrane covered the Bio-Oss material or receiving natural healing procedure as controls. The soft tissue profile was evaluated before tooth extraction and after 6-month healing. Cone-beam computed tomography scans were taken immediately and 6 months after extraction. Vertical and horizontal bone changes were assessed radiographically. Data were analyzed with Mann-Whitney U test and α = 0.05.
No significant differences in soft tissue and vertical bone changes in the medium region of the sockets were found (P > .05). Buccal bone changes in the mesial and distal sites in the test group were significantly lower than the control group (P < .05). Ridge width increased from 0.21mm to 5.30mm at 1mm apical from the crest in the test and reduced from 0.12 mm to 1.00 mm in the control groups.
Ridge preservation at periodontally compromised molar extraction sites might compensate for ridge width and buccal bone resorption that occurs with natural healing alone.
对感染性磨牙牙槽嵴保存的研究有限。
比较感染性磨牙窝接受牙槽嵴保存与自然愈合后硬组织和软组织的变化。
将 35 个感染性磨牙拔牙窝用 Bio-Gide 膜覆盖 Bio-Oss 材料保存(实验组)或接受自然愈合过程作为对照(对照组)。在拔牙前和 6 个月愈合后评估软组织轮廓。拔牙后立即和 6 个月时进行锥形束 CT 扫描。通过放射影像学评估垂直和水平骨变化。采用曼-惠特尼 U 检验进行数据分析,α=0.05。
在窝的中间区域,实验组和对照组的软组织和垂直骨变化无显著差异(P>.05)。实验组近中和远中颊骨在近中和远中部位的变化明显低于对照组(P<.05)。在实验组中,牙槽嵴从牙嵴顶向根尖 1mm 处的宽度从 0.21mm 增加到 5.30mm,而对照组的宽度从 0.12mm 减少到 1.00mm。
在牙周受损的磨牙拔牙部位进行牙槽嵴保存可能会补偿自然愈合过程中发生的牙槽嵴宽度和颊骨吸收。