Melzer Katarina, Heydenreich Juliane, Schutz Yves, Renaud Anne, Kayser Bengt, Mäder Urs
Swiss Federal Institute of Sport, Magglingen 2532, Switzerland.
Institute of Sports Science (ISSUL), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland.
Nutrients. 2016 Jul 20;8(7):438. doi: 10.3390/nu8070438.
"Metabolic Equivalent" (MET) represents a standard amount of oxygen consumed by the body under resting conditions, and is defined as 3.5 mL O₂/kg × min or ~1 kcal/kg × h. It is used to express the energy cost of physical activity in multiples of MET. However, universal application of the 1-MET standard was questioned in previous studies, because it does not apply well to all individuals. Height, weight and resting metabolic rate (RMR, measured by indirect calorimetry) were measured in adolescent males (n = 50) and females (n = 50), women during pregnancy (gestation week 35-41, n = 46), women 24-53 weeks postpartum (n = 27), and active men (n = 30), and were compared to values predicted by the 1-MET standard. The RMR of adolescent males (1.28 kcal/kg × h) was significantly higher than that of adolescent females (1.11 kcal/kg × h), with or without the effects of puberty stage and physical activity levels. The RMR of the pregnant and post-pregnant subjects were not significantly different. The RMR of the active normal weight (0.92 kcal/kg × h) and overweight (0.89 kcal/kg × h) adult males were significantly lower than the 1-MET value. It follows that the 1-MET standard is inadequate for use not only in adult men and women, but also in adolescents and physically active men. It is therefore recommended that practitioners estimate RMR with equations taking into account individual characteristics, such as sex, age and Body Mass Index, and not rely on the 1-MET standard.
“代谢当量”(MET)代表身体在静息状态下消耗的标准氧量,定义为3.5毫升氧气/千克×分钟或约1千卡/千克×小时。它用于以MET倍数表示身体活动的能量消耗。然而,先前的研究对1-MET标准的普遍适用性提出了质疑,因为它并非适用于所有个体。对青春期男性(n = 50)和女性(n = 50)、孕期女性(妊娠35 - 41周,n = 46)、产后24 - 53周的女性(n = 27)以及活跃男性(n = 30)测量了身高、体重和静息代谢率(RMR,通过间接测热法测量),并与1-MET标准预测的值进行比较。无论是否受青春期阶段和身体活动水平的影响,青春期男性的RMR(1.28千卡/千克×小时)显著高于青春期女性(1.11千卡/千克×小时)。怀孕和产后受试者的RMR没有显著差异。活跃的正常体重成年男性(0.92千卡/千克×小时)和超重成年男性(0.89千卡/千克×小时)的RMR显著低于1-MET值。由此可见,1-MET标准不仅不适用于成年男性和女性,也不适用于青少年和身体活跃的男性。因此,建议从业者使用考虑个体特征(如性别、年龄和体重指数)的公式来估算RMR,而不要依赖1-MET标准。