Pott Alexander, Petscher Kerstin, Messemer Marvin, Rottbauer Wolfgang, Dahme Tillman
Department of Medicine II, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016 Dec;47(3):333-339. doi: 10.1007/s10840-016-0160-3. Epub 2016 Jul 23.
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with the cryoballoon is an established treatment for symptomatic atrial fibrillation. The second-generation cryoballoon increased efficacy in comparison to the first-generation cryoballoon. The third-generation cryoballoon was designed with a shorter distal tip to facilitate real-time recording of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. Here, we compared the rate of real-time recordings of PVI of the second- and third-generation cryoballoon.
The incidence of real-time recording of PV isolation and time to PV isolation of the first 37 patients treated with the new third-generation cryoballoon at our center were compared to the last 37 patients treated with the second-generation cryoballoon.
One hundred forty-nine pulmonary veins (PVs) were identified in each group. All PVs were isolated successfully with the second- or third-generation cryoballoon. Real-time registration of PVI occurred in 83 PVs (55.7 %) with the second-generation cryoballoon and in 124 PVs (83.2 %) with the third-generation cryoballoon (p < 0.001). The rate of observed real-time PVI was significantly higher with the third-generation cryoballoon for each individual PV. The time-to-isolation was 44 ± 25 s with the second-generation cryoballoon vs. 42 ± 22 s with the third-generation cryoballoon (p = 0.25). In a short-term clinical follow-up, there was no significant difference in atrial arrhythmia recurrence rates between both groups.
The third-generation cryoballoon facilitates real-time recording of PV isolation with significantly higher rates of observed time-to-isolation. The time to PV isolation is not different between second- and third-generation cryoballoon.
冷冻球囊肺静脉隔离术(PVI)是一种已确立的有症状心房颤动的治疗方法。与第一代冷冻球囊相比,第二代冷冻球囊提高了疗效。第三代冷冻球囊设计有更短的远端尖端,以利于肺静脉(PV)隔离的实时记录。在此,我们比较了第二代和第三代冷冻球囊PVI的实时记录率。
将在我们中心接受新型第三代冷冻球囊治疗的前37例患者的PV隔离实时记录发生率和PV隔离时间与接受第二代冷冻球囊治疗的后37例患者进行比较。
每组均识别出149条肺静脉(PV)。所有PV均通过第二代或第三代冷冻球囊成功隔离。第二代冷冻球囊在83条PV(55.7%)中实现了PVI的实时记录,第三代冷冻球囊在124条PV(83.2%)中实现了实时记录(p<0.001)。对于每个单独的PV,第三代冷冻球囊观察到的实时PVI率显著更高。第二代冷冻球囊的隔离时间为44±25秒,第三代冷冻球囊为42±22秒(p=0.25)。在短期临床随访中,两组间房性心律失常复发率无显著差异。
第三代冷冻球囊有助于PV隔离的实时记录,观察到的隔离时间率显著更高。第二代和第三代冷冻球囊的PV隔离时间无差异。