Suppr超能文献

第三代短头冷冻球囊使实时肺静脉隔离的成功率提高。

Increased rate of observed real-time pulmonary vein isolation with third-generation short-tip cryoballoon.

作者信息

Pott Alexander, Petscher Kerstin, Messemer Marvin, Rottbauer Wolfgang, Dahme Tillman

机构信息

Department of Medicine II, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016 Dec;47(3):333-339. doi: 10.1007/s10840-016-0160-3. Epub 2016 Jul 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with the cryoballoon is an established treatment for symptomatic atrial fibrillation. The second-generation cryoballoon increased efficacy in comparison to the first-generation cryoballoon. The third-generation cryoballoon was designed with a shorter distal tip to facilitate real-time recording of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. Here, we compared the rate of real-time recordings of PVI of the second- and third-generation cryoballoon.

METHODS

The incidence of real-time recording of PV isolation and time to PV isolation of the first 37 patients treated with the new third-generation cryoballoon at our center were compared to the last 37 patients treated with the second-generation cryoballoon.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-nine pulmonary veins (PVs) were identified in each group. All PVs were isolated successfully with the second- or third-generation cryoballoon. Real-time registration of PVI occurred in 83 PVs (55.7 %) with the second-generation cryoballoon and in 124 PVs (83.2 %) with the third-generation cryoballoon (p < 0.001). The rate of observed real-time PVI was significantly higher with the third-generation cryoballoon for each individual PV. The time-to-isolation was 44 ± 25 s with the second-generation cryoballoon vs. 42 ± 22 s with the third-generation cryoballoon (p = 0.25). In a short-term clinical follow-up, there was no significant difference in atrial arrhythmia recurrence rates between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The third-generation cryoballoon facilitates real-time recording of PV isolation with significantly higher rates of observed time-to-isolation. The time to PV isolation is not different between second- and third-generation cryoballoon.

摘要

目的

冷冻球囊肺静脉隔离术(PVI)是一种已确立的有症状心房颤动的治疗方法。与第一代冷冻球囊相比,第二代冷冻球囊提高了疗效。第三代冷冻球囊设计有更短的远端尖端,以利于肺静脉(PV)隔离的实时记录。在此,我们比较了第二代和第三代冷冻球囊PVI的实时记录率。

方法

将在我们中心接受新型第三代冷冻球囊治疗的前37例患者的PV隔离实时记录发生率和PV隔离时间与接受第二代冷冻球囊治疗的后37例患者进行比较。

结果

每组均识别出149条肺静脉(PV)。所有PV均通过第二代或第三代冷冻球囊成功隔离。第二代冷冻球囊在83条PV(55.7%)中实现了PVI的实时记录,第三代冷冻球囊在124条PV(83.2%)中实现了实时记录(p<0.001)。对于每个单独的PV,第三代冷冻球囊观察到的实时PVI率显著更高。第二代冷冻球囊的隔离时间为44±25秒,第三代冷冻球囊为42±22秒(p=0.25)。在短期临床随访中,两组间房性心律失常复发率无显著差异。

结论

第三代冷冻球囊有助于PV隔离的实时记录,观察到的隔离时间率显著更高。第二代和第三代冷冻球囊的PV隔离时间无差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验