Sciarra Luigi, Iacopino Saverio, Palamà Zefferino, De Ruvo Ermenegildo, Filannino Pasquale, Borrelli Alessio, Artale Paolo, Caragliano Alberto, Scarà Antonio, Golia Paolo, De Luca Lucia, Grieco Domenico, Rebecchi Marco, Favale Stefano, Calò Leonardo
Cardiology Department, Policlinico Casilino, Rome, Italy.
Cardiac Electrophysiology Unit, Villa Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM, Cotignola, Italy.
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2018 Jul-Aug;18(4):127-132. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
Third-generation cryoballoon (CB3) is characterized by a 40% shorter distal tip designed to increase the rate of pulmonary veins real-time signal recording in order to measure time necessary to isolate veins, the "Time to effect" (TTE). Few data are currently available on clinical follow up of CB3 treated patients.
Sixtyeight consecutive patients (mean age 57.8 ± 9.6 years, 48 male) with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) were enrolled. Thirthyfour (25 paroxysmal AF) underwent to a 28 mmCB3 pulmonary veins isolation and were compared to 34 treated (21 paroxysmal AF) with 28 mmCB2.
CB3 use was correlated to significant increase of the possibility to measure TTE in every treated veins (left superior 82,35% vs 23,53%, left inferior 70,59% vs 38,24%, right superior 58,82% vs 14,71%, right inferior 52,94% vs 17,65%). When it is measured, TTE wasn't different between two groups. Higher nadir temperature was observed in CB3 patients (-39.4 ± 5.2 °C vs -43.0 ± 7.2 °C, p = 0.03). CB3 procedures were shorter (91.4 ± 21.7 vs 110.9 ± 31.8 min, p = 0.018), with a significant reduction in cryoenergy delivery time (24.2 ± 8.5 vs 20.3 ± 6.7 min, p < 0.05), and a significant reduction in left atrium dwell time (59.3 ± 9.8 vs 69.3 ± 10.8 min, p = 0.02, p < 0.05). At one year follow up period the Kaplan-Meier curve didn't show any significant difference in AF-free survival (Log p = 0,49).
Novel CB3 is a useful tool in order to simplify AF cryoballoon ablation when compared to second generation cryoballoon, as observed in our experience. Follow up data seem confirm a clinical CB3 efficacy at least comparable CB2.
第三代冷冻球囊(CB3)的特点是远端尖端缩短40%,旨在提高肺静脉实时信号记录率,以测量隔离静脉所需的时间,即“起效时间”(TTE)。目前关于接受CB3治疗患者的临床随访数据较少。
连续纳入68例阵发性或持续性心房颤动(AF)患者(平均年龄57.8±9.6岁,男性48例)。34例(25例阵发性AF)患者接受28mm CB3肺静脉隔离治疗,并与34例接受28mm CB2治疗(21例阵发性AF)的患者进行比较。
使用CB3与显著提高每条治疗静脉测量TTE的可能性相关(左上肺静脉82.35%对23.53%,左下肺静脉70.59%对38.24%,右上肺静脉58.82%对14.71%,右下肺静脉52.94%对17.65%)。当进行测量时,两组之间的TTE没有差异。CB3患者观察到更低的最低温度(-39.4±5.2°C对-43.0±7.2°C,p = 0.03)。CB3手术时间更短(91.4±21.7对110.9±31.8分钟,p = 0.018),冷冻能量输送时间显著缩短(24.2±8.5对20.3±6.7分钟,p < 0.05),左心房停留时间显著缩短(59.3±9.8对69.3±10.8分钟,p = 0.02,p < 0.05)。在一年的随访期内,Kaplan-Meier曲线显示无房颤生存率无显著差异(对数p = 0.49)。
如我们的经验所示,与第二代冷冻球囊相比,新型CB3是简化房颤冷冻球囊消融的有用工具。随访数据似乎证实了CB3的临床疗效至少与CB2相当。