Mc Causland Finnian R, Asafu-Adjei Josephine, Betensky Rebecca A, Palevsky Paul M, Waikar Sushrut S
Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Aug 8;11(8):1335-1342. doi: 10.2215/CJN.10991015. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
Intensive RRT may have adverse effects that account for the absence of benefit observed in randomized trials of more intensive versus less intensive RRT. We wished to determine the association of more intensive RRT with changes in urine output as a marker of worsening residual renal function in critically ill patients with severe AKI.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: The Acute Renal Failure Trial Network Study (n=1124) was a multicenter trial that randomized critically ill patients requiring initiation of RRT to more intensive (hemodialysis or sustained low-efficiency dialysis six times per week or continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration at 35 ml/kg per hour) versus less intensive (hemodialysis or sustained low-efficiency dialysis three times per week or continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration at 20 ml/kg per hour) RRT. Mixed linear regression models were fit to estimate the association of RRT intensity with change in daily urine output in survivors through day 7 (n=871); Cox regression models were fit to determine the association of RRT intensity with time to ≥50% decline in urine output in all patients through day 28.
Mean age of participants was 60±15 years old, 72% were men, and 30% were diabetic. In unadjusted models, among patients who survived ≥7 days, mean urine output was, on average, 31.7 ml/d higher (95% confidence interval, 8.2 to 55.2 ml/d) for the less intensive group compared with the more intensive group (P=0.01). More intensive RRT was associated with 29% greater unadjusted risk of decline in urine output of ≥50% (hazard ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 1.51).
More intensive versus less intensive RRT is associated with a greater reduction in urine output during the first 7 days of therapy and a greater risk of developing a decline in urine output of ≥50% in critically ill patients with severe AKI.
强化肾脏替代治疗(RRT)可能存在不良反应,这或许可以解释在比较强化与非强化RRT的随机试验中未观察到获益的原因。我们希望确定强化RRT与尿量变化之间的关联,以此作为重症急性肾损伤(AKI)危重症患者残余肾功能恶化的一个指标。
设计、地点、参与者及测量指标:急性肾衰竭试验网络研究(n = 1124)是一项多中心试验,该试验将需要开始RRT的危重症患者随机分为强化治疗组(每周进行6次血液透析或持续性低效透析,或每小时以35 ml/kg的速度进行连续性静脉-静脉血液透析滤过)和非强化治疗组(每周进行3次血液透析或持续性低效透析,或每小时以20 ml/kg的速度进行连续性静脉-静脉血液透析滤过)。采用混合线性回归模型来估计RRT强度与存活至第7天的患者(n = 871)每日尿量变化之间的关联;采用Cox回归模型来确定RRT强度与所有患者至第28天尿量下降≥50%的时间之间的关联。
参与者的平均年龄为60±15岁,72%为男性,30%患有糖尿病。在未校正的模型中,在存活≥7天的患者中,非强化治疗组的平均尿量比强化治疗组平均每天高31.7 ml(95%置信区间,8.2至55.2 ml/d)(P = 0.01)。强化RRT与尿量下降≥50%的未校正风险高29%相关(风险比,1.29;95%置信区间,1.10至1.51)。
在重症AKI危重症患者中,强化RRT与非强化RRT相比,在治疗的前7天尿量减少更多,且出现尿量下降≥50%的风险更高。